Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Reveal Undervalued Stocks Hiding in Any Market Get Started

Explained: Why Banks Are Both Oil’s Best Friend and Worst Enemy

By Barani Krishnan/Investing.comCommoditiesMar 18, 2023 05:30AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/explained-why-banks-are-both-oils-best-friend-and-worst-enemy-200636353
Explained: Why Banks Are Both Oil’s Best Friend and Worst Enemy
By Barani Krishnan/Investing.com   |  Mar 18, 2023 05:30AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
XAU/USD
-0.54%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
C
+1.73%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
BAC
+0.92%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
GS
+1.84%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
JPM
+1.22%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
CSGN
+1.31%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
  • Recent drop in oil prices was not due to supply and demand, but rather to the actions of investment banks, particularly Credit Suisse
  • Banks are an essential component of the oil trade, providing liquidity to exchanges and over-the-counter markets
  • Banks remain the go-between, acting as counterparties in trades and bearers of stockpiles in anticipation of customer demand

Probably most hurtful to oil longs this week was that crude’s tumble to below $70 a barrel was triggered not by supply-demand but by the same banking sector responsible for much of the market’s pricing euphoria over the past two years. 

Let’s be honest: Not everyone might feel as strongly about calling oil at $100 a barrel by December had that forecast not originally come from Goldman Sachs.

Thus, the saying “with friends like these, who needs enemies?” feels particularly relevant when considering that the banking industry managed to do within days what China’s COVID crisis couldn’t over months — drive U.S. crude down to $60 territory, that is.

While it wasn’t Goldman that delivered that body blow to oil, troubles at another major investment bank, Credit Suisse (SIX:CSGN) — on top of the collapse of a couple of mid-sized U.S. commercial banks — combined in Wednesday’s biggest selloff in crude since the start of 2023. On a weekly basis, it was oil's worst since April 2020, when the initial outbreak of the coronavirus practically destroyed all demand for energy.

The bottom line for the current crisis is liquidity, and it begins with oil itself being the most liquid commodity, not just in the literal sense.

Open interest — which measures the flow of money in a futures or options market — is highest in oil. An estimated 2.5 million contracts of 1,000 barrels each account for the daily open interest in U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude, or WTI, crude on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Friday’s settlement of $66.74 per barrel makes WTI alone worth nearly $171 billion.

Add to that London-traded Brent crude, which has an open interest of 160,000 contracts of 1,000 barrels each. At Friday's close of $72.97 a barrel, Brent’s value stands at almost $12 billion.

Combined, the oil trade is worth close to $200 billion at current pricing. But here’s the catch — despite being such an enormous trade, not a barrel of crude might move without the funding, or liquidity, provided by banks. Banks are the market makers for all commodities, not just oil, as they bring together buyers and sellers that have different needs, risks, time horizons, and incentives.

The nexus between banks and the liquidity in oil and other commodities simply cannot be understated. Even before the pandemic and sheer demand destruction brought WTI to minus $40 a barrel, the collapse of Lehman Brothers crunched oil’s pricing from a record high of $147 to below $40 in the aftermath of the financial crisis 15 years ago.

More than a decade ago, Wall Street powerhouses Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM), Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), and Citigroup (NYSE:C) ran huge proprietary trading desks that took positions in commodities for themselves, aside from customer accounts. The 2008 financial crisis ended that as the Volcker Rule barred banks from engaging in speculative trading activities.

Partial changes brought by the Trump administration in 2019 have only made proprietary trading a gray area for banks, making their foray there an exception rather than the norm.

Even if they aren’t buying or selling it for themselves, banks remain the lifeline of the commodities trade. They provide liquidity to exchanges and over-the-counter markets, plus the availability of hedging, financing, and other intermediation services.

And while they no longer take positions in commodity futures and other derivatives like before, banks actually take physical ownership of crude, coal, natural gas and other energy liquids as well as gold, copper, corn and cocoa while executing trades for these.

This is because, as market makers, banks bear the price risk between the arrival of sellers and buyers, which can lead to temporary accumulations of inventory. They are the go-between, acting as counterparties in trades and bearers of stockpiles in anticipation of customer demand.

Due to the illiquidity of many commodities exposures, as well as the construct of some commodity risk management solutions, banks have to accumulate and net off various exposures that can require more time to unwind than a traditional market maker’s position in highly liquid markets, such as, say, U.S. Treasuries.

Because banks are on both sides of the buy and sell proposition, they promote efficient markets and help to maintain pricing relationships. They improve price convergence — the act of futures contracts moving toward spot price at expiry — and price discipline. This is true in both physical and financial commodities markets where banks stand ready to deliver the product or take delivery of the product in the markets in which they are active.

Via their involvement in physical commodity markets, banks create necessary links among regions, products, and delivery that fosters competitive pricing and efficient allocation of resources.

For example, a bank with electricity transmission capabilities between the Midwest and Georgia can use this to “wheel” or move power from an oversupplied and lower-priced area in the Midwest to an undersupplied, higher-priced location in Georgia. This is a low-risk activity for banking entities and helps eliminate price disparities and mitigates supply shortages and price spikes to the benefit of U.S. businesses and consumers. Trading exchanges on their own have a very limited number of products with sufficient liquidity.

Active physical market participation enables banks to be ready to respond to client needs with the expertise and execution capabilities to manage the risks associated with a transaction. This includes understanding local markets, not only to price each hedge and manage risks but also to provide the required power scheduling services.

In order to provide these services, banks need to build an inventory of hedging positions prior to each customer transaction and engage in transactions subsequent to each transaction, to manage the banks’ risk. Given the significant illiquidity of many power markets, these transactions often include a combination of trades in similar but not fully correlated products.

These combined physical and financial commodity trade activities are essential for banks to service wind farm developers. Revenue hedges enable more efficient capital formation for these projects and companies. Without the physical commodity revenue hedges, it is unlikely that wind farms could secure debt financing, and they likely could not be built.

The same applies to U.S. shale drillers, who, without access to liquid, long-dated contracts, would likely see their investments in new production diminish with the corresponding rise in consumer prices and greater volatility.

Other shale-rich countries with large resource potential (e.g., China, Argentina, and Poland) that do not have the same market structure and intermediary presence are struggling to replicate the success of the North American model.

The consequences of impairing the role played by banks in commodities could be far-reaching and negative. The development of new wind farms and natural gas power plants may be curtailed because of the inability of developers to hedge their price risks. Independent oil and gas producers and heating oil dealers would have limited ability to hedge the price risks associated with investment and inventory. Airlines, highly vulnerable to jet fuel prices, could be put at risk.

Refineries could be shut down, leading to higher gasoline prices. Overall, competition would be reduced in energy markets, and smaller players would be disadvantaged. Higher volatility would lead to foreshortening of domestic investment, leading to increased foreign energy dependence. And consumers—and the U.S. economy—would be hurt by higher and more uncertain prices.

In short, if banks aren’t participating in raw materials markets, their ability to serve clients with risk management and financing services would suffer. It is not at all clear who could replace them or to what extent. Some markets would be more opaque, less-transparent entities based outside the United States.

Others could be large competitors to the small- and medium-sized companies being served by the banks. Moreover, all would be much less regulated than banks, which are among the most highly regulated entities in the United States.

I decided to research and write this explainer in response to comments in Investing.com’s oil trading forum this week that it’s ridiculous for crude prices to hit 15-month lows simply on the back of a crisis of confidence in banking. Some argued that it would be more acceptable if such a market downturn was triggered by a demand crisis in China, the world’s largest oil importer.

Yes, an implosion in Chinese demand could get oil to even below $60 a barrel. But there’s something as big as demand, and that’s liquidity. You need to appreciate that and the price discovery role played by the banks, which, while appearing to be this week’s worst enemy for oil, has often been the market’s best friend.

***

Disclaimer: Barani Krishnan uses a range of views outside his own to bring diversity to his analysis of any market. For neutrality, he sometimes presents contrarian views and market variables. He does not hold positions in the commodities and securities he writes about.

Explained: Why Banks Are Both Oil’s Best Friend and Worst Enemy
 

Related Articles

Gary Tanashian
Here’s Why You Should Buy Gold Now By Gary Tanashian - Mar 31, 2023 6

Various promotions along the way of the Continuum have distilled the case for gold down to handy buzz phrases like “got gold?” as if it were a carton of milk. Other promotions have...

Phil Flynn
The Energy Report: The Blind Side By Phil Flynn - Mar 31, 2023 1

The petroleum markets are suffering from supply-side blindness and the recent drop in oil prices is going to become a problem for the global economy. The market has ignored...

Explained: Why Banks Are Both Oil’s Best Friend and Worst Enemy

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (25)
Duncan McTaggart
Duncan McTaggart Mar 22, 2023 9:30AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This was a well timed and highly informative piece. Thank you for writing.
Gonzalo Ribeiro
Gonzalo Ribeiro Mar 20, 2023 2:19PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Top notch, as usual. Thank you, Barani
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan Mar 20, 2023 2:19PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks much, Gonzalo. Wishing you a productive week ahead, mate.
Crim Jamer
Crim Jamer Mar 20, 2023 2:45AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Good and informative article.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan Mar 20, 2023 2:45AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks much, CJ.
Invest Right
Invest Right Mar 20, 2023 12:41AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Very informative. Thanks Barani!
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan Mar 20, 2023 12:41AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks, IR. Truly appreciate the feedback.
SATHYAMURTHY PS
SATHYAMURTHY PS Mar 19, 2023 9:27PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This is really a primer on liquidity in commodities trading. Thank you for the clear explanation.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan Mar 19, 2023 9:27PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You're most welcome, Sathya. It's truly a pleasure to interact with readers like you. Bests, mate.
Flat Top
Flat Top Mar 19, 2023 2:37PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Excellent article as usual. I always look forward to reading your articles. Keep up the good work.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan Mar 19, 2023 2:37PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks much, FT. Bests to you.
Jim Morrison
Jim Morrison Mar 19, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Maybe part of the problem is having people run banks who have no idea what they are doing and put their focus on woke investments . Kamala is the best example of failing upwards and it's everywhere in government, corporations , banking and our government run education. if your sole reason for hiring someone is based on a narrative you are doomed to fail. Reality exists even if the left pretends it does not.
Show previous replies (1)
Dave Jones
Dave Jones Mar 19, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
His point is correct. Have you seen how woke the bank was? Also Twitter was bleeding out but waf. It's everywhere.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan Mar 19, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Dave Jones  , whose point is correct? Mine or Jim's?
Todd Carlisle
Todd Carlisle Mar 19, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
these fools can't frame an issue in terms other than the culture war, it's all they hear all day long.. woke this.. CRT that.. these are economic issues but that's a topic too in depth for a crowd whose anti intellectual bias explains why they're so ill informed
Kris GE
Kris GE Mar 19, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Barani Krishnan Thanks God she does NOT. Biden and Kamala duo is one of the main reasons we are in this mess. Total incompetence covered by MSM  and security apparatus. We see the results. Crisis at home and Int'l.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan Mar 19, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Todd Carlisle  I hear you and, unfortunately, the issues we try and articulate will continue getting drowned out in their noise. Thanks anyway for the feedback, mate.
PETER LENK
PETER LENK Mar 19, 2023 9:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Great article, very informing.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan Mar 19, 2023 9:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks much, Peter Lenk.
simone scelsa
simone scelsa Mar 19, 2023 8:18AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The inflation battle was just lost. What happens to commodities when the dollar collapse? That's what we should be asking ourselves.
Bzhar bijar
Bzhar bijar Mar 19, 2023 3:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
thanks  Barani Krishna for your explain..
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email