Unlock Premium Data: Up to 50% Off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Are These Global Companies On The Right Side Of History?

Published 04/27/2022, 07:53 PM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Despite a global boycott of Russia and an international condemnation of the Kremlin’s actions against Ukraine, some multinationals have dismissed demands for exiting or scaling down their presence in Russia for various reasons and choosing to continue business-as-usual.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has dragged on for two months since Russia started invading Ukraine on Feb. 24. The crisis has led to elevated commodity prices globally, particularly oil, supply chain disruptions, food shortages, and environmental impacts on Ukraine’s air, water, and soil.

In the early days of the war, Russia witnessed a vast exodus of global companies that sought to avoid being branded as funding a war against the people of Ukraine.

Corporate Exodus

The long list of multinationals that have severed ties with Russia amid the war include PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL), Ford Motor (NYSE:F), Volkswagen (OTC:VLKAF), Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM), Boeing (NYSE:BA), Airbus (OTC:EADSY), Diageo (NYSE:DEO), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Samsung Electronics (OTC:SSNLF), Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS) and Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), as well as oil majors BP (NYSE:BP), ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) and Shell (NYSE:SHEL).

Shell recently started to withdraw its staff from its joint ventures with Russia’s Gazprom (OTC:OGZRY) over a month after the company said it would withdraw from the Russian oil trade.

More than 750 companies have already cut their ties with Russia, according to a tally by the Yale School of Management (Yale SOM).

Defying Public Pressure

While dozens of companies have already exited or reduced their operations in Russia, several firms are still choosing to stay, defying calls to stop funding a war machine.

Privately owned American industrial conglomerate Koch Industries is among them. In mid-March, Koch President and Chief Operating Officer Dave Robertson said,

"The company’s subsidiary, Guardian Industries, will not walk away from our employees there or hand over these manufacturing facilities to the Russian government so it can operate and benefit from them.”

Apart from Koch, there are about 330 more multinationals are still operating in Russia that are either defying demands to exit or reduce activities or are postponing future planned investment while continuing substantive business in the country, according to the non-profit group Don’t Fund War’s assessment of the Yale SOM list.

Tech Companies Stay The Course

The list includes Chinese tech and gaming giant Tencent (NYSE:TME) and Chinese e-commerce firm Alibaba Group (NYSE:BABA). Tencent has avoided taking sides in the war but appealed to users last month to be objective when discussing sensitive topics like the Ukraine conflict. Alibaba, which has built a presence in Russia in recent years, has remained quiet on its stance in the war.

Didi Global (NYSE:DIDI), which has been under intense regulatory scrutiny in China, had quickly reversed its earlier decision to pull out of Russia, saying it will continue to serve drivers and passengers in the market.

Computer manufacturers Lenovo (OTC:LNVGY) and Asus have chosen to stay in Russia to sell computer-related products even after their peer Acer earlier this month decided to join the global boycott.

Xiaomi (OTC:XIACF), the second best-selling smartphone brand in Russia next to Samsung Electronics, has also remained silent about its plans in Russia. The brand forayed into the market in 2017.

Apart from tech firms, global firms including Nestle (OTC:NSRGY), Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG), Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) and Merck (NYSE:MRK) are buying time in Russia during the war.

They are either pausing patient enrollment in ongoing clinical trials, scaling back operations and stopping new investments, or halting non-essential imports and exports. According to The Washington Post in March, some experts say it is getting increasingly difficult for dozens of companies in Russia to leave.

James O’Rourke, a professor of management at the University of Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business, was quoted by The Washington Post as saying,

"This may be one of the moments in history in which proactive disinvestment is the best option. If you can’t move money in and out of Russia in a convertible currency, what’s the point of being there?”

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.