Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
👀 Bezos, Buffett & Berkowitz: What's in Their Portfolios? Unlock Data

North Korea's Kim orders new ICBM, bigger nuclear arsenal amid tension

Published Dec 31, 2022 03:03PM ET Updated Jan 01, 2023 07:25AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

By Hyonhee Shin and Joyce Lee

SEOUL (Reuters) -North Korean leader Kim Jong Un called for developing new intercontinental ballistic missiles and a larger nuclear arsenal to counter U.S.-led threats, state media said on Sunday, amid flaring tension between the rival Koreas.

At a meeting of the ruling Workers' Party, Kim highlighted the need to secure "overwhelming military power" to defend its sovereignty and security.

The meeting came amid cross-border tensions over last week's intrusion by North Korean drones into the South, and the North's series of missile launches, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

South Korea's President Yoon Suk-yeol, during phone calls with military chiefs, called for "solid mental readiness and practical training" to ensure any North Korean provocations will be met with retaliation, according to a statement from his office.

Kim accused Washington and Seoul of trying to "isolate and stifle" Pyongyang with U.S. nuclear strike assets constantly deployed in South Korea, calling it "unprecedented in human history."

He vowed to develop another ICBM system "whose main mission is quick nuclear counter-strike" under a plan to bolster the country's nuclear force, the official KCNA news agency said.

"The prevailing situation calls for making redoubled efforts to overwhelmingly beef up the military muscle ... in response to the worrying military moves by the U.S. and other hostile forces," it said.

South Korea has become "our undoubted enemy" being "hell-bent on imprudent and dangerous arms buildup" and hostile military moves, Kim said.

"It highlights the importance and necessity of a mass-producing of tactical nuclear weapons and calls for an exponential increase of the country's nuclear arsenal," Kim said, adding these would be a "main orientation" of the 2023 nuclear and defence strategy.

As part of the plan, the country will also launch its first military satellite "at the earliest date possible" by accelerating its drive to build a spy satellite, with preparations in the final stage, KCNA said.

'SUPER-LARGE ROCKET LAUNCHER'

The report came hours after North Korea fired a short-range ballistic missile off its east coast, in a rare late-night, New Year's Day weapons test.

The isolated country also launched three ballistic missiles on Saturday, capping a year marked by a record number of missile tests.

KCNA said in a separate dispatch that it was testing a new 600 mm super-large multiple rocket launcher capable of carrying nuclear weapons.

Kim lauded the munitions industry for delivering 30 units of the system, calling it a "core, offensive weapon" with all of South Korea within its range, and an ability to conduct a surprise and precision launch.

"We have declared our resolute will to respond with nuke for nuke and an all-out confrontation for an all-out confrontation," Kim told a delivery ceremony on Saturday, ordering more powerful weapons to "absolutely overwhelm the U.S. imperialist aggressive forces and their puppet army."

Inter-Korean ties have long been testy but have grown even more tense since Yoon took office in May pledging a tougher line against Pyongyang.

The recent drone intrusion rekindled criticism over South Korea's air defences, and Yoon on Sunday again urged the military to stand ready to retaliate.

"Our military must resolutely retaliate against any provocation by the enemy with the determination to fight," Yoon told the military chiefs.

The latest missile flew about 400 kilometres (249 miles)after being fired around 2:50 a.m. local time (1750 GMT) from the Ryongsong area of the capital Pyongyang, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) said.

The JCS strongly condemned the North's series of missile tests as "grave provocations" and urged an immediate halt.

Japan's coast guard said the missile reached an altitude of around 100 km and flew around 350 km. Defence Minister Yasukazu Hamada said Tokyo had protested to North Korea over the launch via diplomatic channels in Beijing.

The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command said the launch did not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory but highlighted the destabilising impact of North Korea's weapons programme.

North Korea fired an unprecedented number of missiles in 2022, pressing on with weapons development amid speculation it could test a nuclear weapon for a seventh time.

In November, the North also resumed testing ICBMs for the first time since 2017, successfully launching the massive new Hwasong-17, potentially able to strike anywhere in the United States.

North Korea's Kim orders new ICBM, bigger nuclear arsenal amid tension
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (5)
Steven ML
Steven ML Jan 01, 2023 3:52PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
How would US feel if North Korea and Cuba were taking part in military exercises in the Gulf of Mexico?
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Jan 01, 2023 3:52PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
There is no moral equivalence between your hypothetical presence of a military directed by a totalitarian dictator, unelected and oppressing a people with no regard for human rights on the shores of the worlds largest free nation and the USA participating with allies in the defense of free people in legitimate democracies.
Roger Miller
Roger Miller Jan 01, 2023 1:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
A result of the Biden administration and Democrats great global diplomacy. Never has the world been so close to another world war than since they took power. And their followers are to naive to see how they have alienated and marginalized the west from the majority of the world’s population.
jason xx
jason xx Jan 01, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
It doesn't take a genius to realize that if a NK nuclear strike is inevitable then we should be the ones to strike first. The American military is obviously considering this to get it over with. Good luck everyone
gab nea
gab nea Jan 01, 2023 7:23AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
the poor baby needs attention periodically! give him a bottle and change his diaper, please!
William Smith
William Smith Dec 31, 2022 10:36PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Weak American president encourages scoundrels to be aggressive. That's why Xi flies into Taiwan airspace, Kim makes noise and why Putin invaded Ukraine.
Show previous replies (1)
jon wick
jon wick Dec 31, 2022 10:36PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
gab nea  I am not American, and I understand that choosing between both is just a matter of "the lesser of the two evils". But from the outside what I can say is;  the Biden administration has displayed more weakness, both internally and externally. On the other hand, in Trump's case, USA's position was weak only due to internal situations (Black people hate, racism, gun laws, whatever happened in Capitol Hill...)
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Dec 31, 2022 10:36PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You understand nothing.
jason xx
jason xx Dec 31, 2022 10:36PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Enemy propaganda
Stephen Fa
Stephen Fa Dec 31, 2022 10:36PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The lib_tards here can only insult with any coherent logic in response.
Stephen Fa
Stephen Fa Dec 31, 2022 10:36PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
without
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email