Breaking News
Get 40% Off 0
👀 Reveal Warren Buffett's stock picks that are beating the S&P 500 by +174.3% Get 40% Off

Walid Chammah files lawsuit against Signa for unpaid €14m advisory fees

Published Nov 18, 2023 09:59AM ET Updated Nov 18, 2023 09:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters.

LONDON - Financial disputes have come to the forefront as Walid Chammah, a former Morgan Stanley banker, has taken legal action against René Benko's property conglomerate Signa. The lawsuit, filed in the High Court, pertains to unpaid fees exceeding €14 million for advisory services provided during the acquisition of Galeria Kaufhof. Chammah claims that despite fulfilling his consultancy role and guiding the significant transaction to completion in 2019, his success fee remains unsettled.

The legal battle emerges amidst Signa's financial troubles, which recently led to significant corporate restructuring. The company, once a sprawling real estate empire with interests in iconic properties like the Chrysler Building and KaDeWe, as well as a substantial stake in Selfridges valued at £4 billion, has faced a series of setbacks. In a move indicative of its distress, Signa conceded control of Selfridges to the Central Group last week.

Adding complexity to the scenario is the ousting of Benko from his management position earlier this month. Shareholders, including Hans Peter Haselsteiner, intervened with an emergency capital injection in an attempt to stabilize the faltering firm. This contrasts sharply with Benko's previous standing when Forbes estimated his personal fortune at around €6 billion.

Chammah's legal team asserts that Benko personally acknowledged the debt during conversations on March 30 and May 1, 2023. The dispute centers around an agreement reportedly made in a Mayfair private members club in 2015. According to Chammah, this agreement included a monthly retainer starting in 2016 and a success fee linked to the full acquisition of Galeria Kaufhof.

The case sheds light on the complex web of agreements and financial obligations that underpin major corporate transactions and the potential fallout when such commitments go unmet. With both parties entrenched in their positions, the High Court will now be tasked with unraveling the details of this high-stakes financial disagreement.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.

Walid Chammah files lawsuit against Signa for unpaid €14m advisory fees
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email