Breaking News
Get 40% Off 0
Is NVDA a 🟢 buy or 🔴 sell? Unlock Now

Volkswagen says audit finds no sign of forced labour at Xinjiang site

Published Dec 05, 2023 12:04PM ET Updated Dec 05, 2023 03:07PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Volkswagen logo is seen during the New York International Auto Show, in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., April 5, 2023. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
 
VOWG_p
+1.08%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Victoria Waldersee

BERLIN (Reuters) - A Volkswagen-commissioned audit of its jointly owned site in Xinjiang, China, had found no signs of forced labour, the automaker said on Tuesday, although the auditor added that the challenges of data collection in China were widely known.

The audit, which was carried out by German human rights due diligence firm Loening Human Rights & Responsible Business GmbH, included on-site interviews and inspection of employee contracts and salary payments for the site's 197 employees.

"The situation in China and Xinjiang and the challenges in collecting data for audits are well known," Loening's managing director Markus Loening said in a statement, adding the mandate was limited to the employees of the Urumqi plant, which is a joint venture with SAIC Motors.

Earlier this year, Volkswagen (ETR:VOWG_p) investors demanded that the carmaker request cooperation from SAIC to conduct an independent audit of labour conditions at the site in Xinjiang, a region where rights groups have documented abuses including mass forced labour in detention camps.

Beijing denies any such abuses.

Global index provider MSC marked Volkswagen with a 'red flag' in its social issue category in November 2022 due to allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang, prompting some investors to drop the stock from their portfolios.

Analysts at Citi said that VW's findings could potentially reverse a significant part of its stock's underperformance in the wake of the rebuke.

"If this audit conclusion satisfies MSCI, and the 'red flag' is removed, many EU investors currently not allowed to own any VW shares given ESG metrics, may now buy back at least some exposure," Citi said in a note. 'LITTLE TO DO'

Loening carried out the audit with two Chinese lawyers from a firm in Shenzhen, Volkswagen said, without naming them.

Beijing has on numerous occasions sought to curb the influence of Western auditors across China.

A U.S. auditor's office was raided in Beijing earlier this year and reports emerged that China instructed state-owned enterprises to stop using the 'Big Four' auditing firms PwC, EY, KPMG and Deloitte.

Volkswagen said the audit was conducted in line with the SA8000 standard, a management systems standard based on international human rights principles which assesses eight areas including child labour, forced labour and health and safety.

Still, the site had not received an official SA8000 certification, Volkswagen added. Loening is not listed on the website of SAI, which crafted the standard, as an accredited body to provide such certifications.

Volkswagen wound down the site's operations after the pandemic, reducing the number of staff from a peak of 650 to 197, of which just under a quarter are Uyghur. It has denied reports that it has kept the plant open as a condition from Beijing to keep producing across China.

"The employees are paid above average and have little to do," Loening said, highlighting that the plant, which previously assembled the Santana model, now only handled "technical commissioning and deliveries to the region".

Volkswagen's China chief Ralf Brandstaetter said he saw no signs of forced labour when he toured the site in February.

However, his comments drew criticism from some campaigners and a major Volkswagen investor who said ascertaining labour standards in the region was impossible.

Volkswagen says audit finds no sign of forced labour at Xinjiang site
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email