Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

U.S. vows 100% tariffs on French Champagne, cheese, handbags over digital tax

Stock Markets Dec 03, 2019 05:40AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A cheesemonger cuts a large piece of Comte cheese at Beaufils affineur in Paris

By David Lawder and Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government on Monday said it may slap punitive duties of up to 100% on $2.4 billion in imports from France of Champagne, handbags, cheese and other products, after concluding that France's new digital services tax would harm U.S. tech companies.

The U.S. Trade Representative's office said its "Section 301" investigation found that the French tax was "inconsistent with prevailing principles of international tax policy, and is unusually burdensome for affected U.S. companies," including Alphabet Inc's Google (O:GOOGL), Facebook Inc (O:FB), Apple Inc (O:AAPL) and Amazon.com Inc (O:AMZN).

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said the government was exploring whether to open similar investigations into the digital services taxes of Austria, Italy and Turkey.

"The USTR is focused on countering the growing protectionism of EU member states, which unfairly targets U.S. companies," Lighthizer said. His statement made no mention of proposed digital taxes in Canada or Britain.

The U.S. trade agency said it would collect public comments through Jan. 14 on its proposed tariff list as well as the option of imposing fees or restrictions on French services, with a public hearing scheduled for Jan. 7.

It did not specify an effective date for the proposed 100% duties.

CHAMPAGNE, ROUGE AND GRUYERE

The list targets some products that were spared from 25% tariffs imposed by the United States over disputed European Union aircraft subsidies, including sparkling wines, handbags and make-up preparations - products that would hit French luxury goods giant LVMH (PA:LVMH) and cosmetics maker L'Oreal (PA:OREP) hard.

Gruyere cheese, also spared from the USTR aircraft tariffs levied in October, featured prominently in the list of French products targeted for 100% duties, along with numerous other cheeses.

The findings won favor from U.S. lawmakers and U.S. tech industry groups, who have long argued that the tax unfairly targets U.S firms.

"The French digital services tax is unreasonable, protectionist and discriminatory," Senators Charles Grassley and Ron Wyden, the top Republican and Democrat, respectively, on the Senate Finance Committee, said in a joint statement.

Spokespeople for the French embassy and the European Union delegation in Washington could not immediately be reached for comment.

But prior to the release of the USTR's report, a French official said that France would dispute the trade agency's findings, repeating Paris' contention that the digital tax is not aimed specifically at U.S. technology companies.

"We will not give up on taxation" of digital firms, the official said.

France’s 3% levy applies to revenue from digital services earned by firms with more than 25 million euros ($27.86 million) in French revenue and 750 million euros (644 million pounds) worldwide.

The USTR's report and proposed tariff list follow months of negotiations between French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire and U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin over a global overhaul of digital tax rules. The two struck a compromise in August at a G7 summit in France that would refund U.S. firms the difference between the French tax and a new mechanism being drawn up through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

But Trump never formally endorsed that deal and declined to say whether his French tariff threat was off the table.

U.S. vows 100% tariffs on French Champagne, cheese, handbags over digital tax
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (10)
me ish
me ish Dec 03, 2019 6:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
It amazes me that Trump thinks its fine that American companies, as they have no high street presence as opposed to their competitors around Europe, can not pay their fair share of taxes for selling to EU consumers - every other business in the EU not only has to pay local sales tax and business rates let alone the other overheads of selling to the public - the likes of Amazon should at least pay their fair share of tax rather than the free ride they've been having over the last decade - the likes of Starbucks do some dodgy accounting in terms of buying their beans from the lowest country on tax and charge their shops in the UK a fortune for those beans, meaning they make no profit in the UK - this is just flash accounting - for the cost of a Starbucks coffee, of course they're making a real profit from every coffee they sell in the UK - they just "choose" to make their profits elsewhere where tax is lowest - this is the sort of shenanigans that you'd expect from Trump - Chief mafiaosa
Ludovic Raymond
Ludovic Raymond Dec 03, 2019 6:05AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Reading American representatives accusing European or anyone else of being protectionnism is clearly a joke, or pure hypocrisy, as you like
Ludovic Raymond
Ludovic Raymond Dec 03, 2019 6:05AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
And now the President defends tech giants after threatening them.. not bad either
TA XVCI
TA XVCI Dec 03, 2019 4:16AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
First Brazil and Argentina, now EU going to eat some of these tariffs and China on 15 Dec? Time to dump all these pump? Bad bad sign for this hopium market.
Al Vlaj
alvlaj Dec 03, 2019 4:16AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The EU will not pay these tariffs. The US consumer will. Trump hates Americans just as Putin and NK instruct him to.
Ephraim Shavit
Ephraim Shavit Dec 03, 2019 3:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
It did not work with China,Canada,Mexico and some more.Why should work with Europe?Somehow it seems that he just wants to keep his promises to his base.The fact that those tariffs harm The American Economy seems to be of a secondary importance.Apres MOI le deluge.
Nathan Kriever
Nathan Kriever Dec 03, 2019 2:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I kind of like what they're doing here. It would be nice to see this Tech grow... However, it does seem like we're Picking-and-choosing arbitrary stuff. And picking-on certain Countries, long been considered our Allies.. . But, what caught me off-guard, my Jaw dropped to the ground, when I saw "The USTR is focused on countering the growing protectionism of EU member states" WHAT?!?!? Who are WE to be lecturing Anybody, about Protectionism...of All Things. That's totally like the pot calling the kettle Black, if you know what I mean. Republicans have Always been strongly and solidly Against protectionism... until trump.
Nathan Kriever
Nathan Kriever Dec 03, 2019 2:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
All these Tariffs, you see What it creates, just more Tariffs. And, then countries create EVEN MORE Tariffs, to be used as bargaining Chips. A Vicious Cycle. destroys global growth, in the end.
Nathan Kriever
Nathan Kriever Dec 03, 2019 2:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Tariffs, are Simply the Lazy-Man's way of Negotiating. A definite Mark, of a weak leader.
Al Vlaj
alvlaj Dec 03, 2019 2:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
That is because Trump was actually a registered democrat. He actually voted for Hillary when she ran against Obama. He is an economic liberal like most democrats who happen to hijack the GOP. This is not conservative thinking or behavior. He is an economic liberal just like Warren and Sanders.
Ludovic Raymond
Ludovic Raymond Dec 03, 2019 2:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Nathan Kriever Tarriffs lead to more tarrifs, and nobody wins (from) a trade war, exactly
Song Li
Song Li Dec 03, 2019 2:48AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Is that mean trump will sign with china ? Trump just go on with more tariff with other country
Sergio Orenes
Sergio Orenes Dec 03, 2019 2:48AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
seem fair to me
Steven Chen
Gamer_LG Dec 02, 2019 11:34PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
so it will be cheaper to fly to EU to buy a nice bag?
Kaveh Sun
Kaveh Sun Dec 02, 2019 9:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Europe keeps finding ways to extract money from huge american companies(microsoft,google,apple)
Andrei Danaila
Andrei Danaila Dec 02, 2019 9:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Should countries in Europe not do this? In the end, a lot of the business of these companies is also done in Europe with as few taxes paid as possible. People are complaining about the growing inequality between the 1% and the rest. That inequality mainly grows because the companies pay very little compared to their huge incomes. I would prefer direct payments to employees to actually grow (adjusted to inflation) and to have less socialist programs because of a smaller need for them, but as long as the discrepancy keeps getting wider and wider what can be done?
Ab Ab
Ab Ab Dec 02, 2019 8:39PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
keep doing what you doing , usa will go into recession very soon .
daryl chamberlin
daryl chamberlin Dec 02, 2019 8:39PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Gee, haven’t heard that one before :-)
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email