Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

US Supreme Court ruling on agency powers may impact Biden ESG investing rule

Published 01/19/2024, 04:04 PM
Updated 01/20/2024, 02:20 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The sun casts shadows as it rises over the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, U.S., December 20, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

By Daniel Wiessner

(Reuters) - An impending U.S. Supreme Court ruling that could curb the regulatory powers of federal agencies may play a critical role in a challenge by Republican-led states to a rule issued by President Joe Biden's administration allowing socially conscious investing by employee retirement plans, according to a new court filing.

The 26 states, led by Utah and Texas, asked a U.S. appeals court late on Thursday to wait to decide whether to block the U.S. Department of Labor rule until the Supreme Court issues its decision on agency powers, expected by the end of June.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments in a dispute involving a government-run program to monitor for overfishing of herring off New England's coast. Two fishing companies asked the justices to restrict or overturn the Supreme Court's 1984 legal precedent requiring judges to defer to reasonable federal agency interpretations of U.S. laws deemed to be ambiguous, a doctrine called " Chevron (NYSE:CVX) deference."

Texas-based U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, presiding over the lawsuit challenging the investing rule, said in September that the U.S. law governing retirement plans was unclear on whether such plans could consider environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors in making investment decisions.

The Labor Department's view that plans can weigh those factors as long as they prioritize traditional financial considerations was reasonable, Kacsmaryk said in declining to block the rule pending the outcome of the lawsuit.

The states on Thursday filed a brief with a New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to reverse Kacsmaryk's decision. They said Chevron deference does not apply to the case because federal law clearly requires retirement plans to act "solely and exclusively" for the financial benefit of participants.

But if the 5th Circuit finds otherwise, it should wait for the Supreme Court to rule on the fate of Chevron deference before deciding the case, the states said in their filing.

The rule improperly inserts political agendas into investment decisions that affect the retirement savings of hundreds of millions of people, the states said. A subsidiary of Liberty Energy and an oil and gas trade group are also plaintiffs in the case.

Finalized in November 2023, the rule covers plans that collectively invest $12 trillion on behalf of more than 150 million people. It reversed restrictions adopted by Republican former President Donald Trump's administration on considering ESG factors in making investment decisions.

Critics of ESG investing, including many Republicans, have said it advances liberal political and social agendas at the expense of plan participants or shareholders who may suffer financial losses as a result.

The U.S. Department of Justice, which is defending the ESG rule, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The brief by the states represents an early illustration of the widespread impact that overruling Chevron deference could have by making it harder for federal agencies to defend their rules in court.

Pushing to eliminate the doctrine is part of a broader effort by conservatives and business-backed groups to curb the powers of what they call the "administrative state" as they seek to weaken the federal agency bureaucracy that interprets laws, crafts rules and implements executive action.

The Supreme Court handed a significant victory to that movement in 2022, ruling that the power to adopt policies involving "major questions" with broad societal impact is reserved for Congress and not federal agencies.

Biden's administration has urged the Supreme Court to preserve Chevron deference, arguing that the doctrine recognizes the need for agencies to "fill in the gaps" when legislation is ambiguous.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The sun casts shadows as it rises over the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, U.S., December 20, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

The questions posed by the justices during Wednesday's arguments did not reveal a clear majority in favor of overturning Chevron deference. Some of the conservative justices, who have a 6-3 majority on the court, seemed skeptical of the doctrine's continuing force but others signaled hesitation about reversing it.

(This story has been refiled to correct garble in paragraph 1)

Latest comments

ESG is dying, as it should. Trying to social engineer investing is a losing proposition.
another beat down for dictator Brandon
Premature ejaculation.
mark, Biden has lost nothing. this a non-issue . seems the right wing wants to intrude in everything In order to control.
Weird, poor people with no money try to teach what rich and successful people should do with their money. This is called socialism and it leads to misery for all (see Argentina) Advice from the heart: earn your money and do whatever you want with it, but don't spend other people's money
Hey, do you know oeg? You both seem confused.
John, what poor people are you referring to? you do know socialism, as you mention, begins with politicians receiving all the salary and perks, pensions they receive for life. they even vote for their "socialism" pay raises. remember that the next time a republican cries about entitlements or socialism.
Weird, poor people with no money try to teach what rich and successful people should do with their money. This is called socialism and it leads to misery for all (see Argentina) Advice from the heart: earn your money and do whatever you want with it, but don't spend other people's money
The Supreme Court is corrupt. You can buy one for the cost of an RV. Try harder.
Even if even if the chevron deference is overturned, individuals should continue to put their money into socially and morally tuned investments. What good is a pot full of money if you have promoted morally inept businesses and current crazes or fads, you will lose your essence of life.  Sometimes voting with your investment monies is the only way of counteracting corporate greed and exploitation
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.