Unlock Premium Data: Up to 50% Off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Visa, Mastercard reach $30 billion settlement over credit card fees

Published 03/26/2024, 09:58 AM
Updated 03/27/2024, 06:17 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Stickers with the corporate logos of Visa and MasterCard are seen at the entrance of a hardware store in Caracas, Venezuela March 14, 2019. REUTERS/Carlos Garcia Rawlins/File Photo

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Visa and Mastercard (NYSE:MA) reached an estimated $30 billion settlement to limit credit and debit card fees for merchants, with some savings likely to be passed on to consumers through lower prices.

The antitrust settlement announced on Tuesday is one of the largest in U.S. history, and if it receives court approval would resolve most claims in nationwide litigation that began in 2005.

Some critics believe it may not go far enough, saying the savings would be temporary and fees would remain high.

Merchants have long accused Visa (NYSE:V) and Mastercard of charging inflated swipe fees, or interchange fees, when shoppers used credit or debit cards, and barring them through "anti-steering" rules from directing customers toward cheaper means of payment.

Swipe fees typically include small fixed fees plus a percentage of total sale amounts, and average about 1.5% to 3.5% per transaction according to Bankrate.com.

Under the settlement, Visa and Mastercard would reduce swipe rates by at least four basis points - 0.04 percentage points - for three years, and ensure an average rate that is seven basis points below the current average for five years.

Both card networks also agreed to cap rates for five years and remove anti-steering provisions.

Merchants will have more discretion to offer discounts, or impose surcharges on cards with higher interchange fees.

Many already warn customers at checkout they will pay more using cards instead of cash.

The fee rollbacks and caps alone are worth $29.79 billion, according to court papers, and Visa estimated that small businesses comprise more than 90% of the settling merchants.

Visa and Mastercard denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.

In separate statements, Visa's North American president Kim Lawrence said the accord addressed "true pain points" identified by small businesses, while Mastercard General Counsel Rob Baird said it gave businesses "substantial certainty."

Shares of Visa closed down 0.2%, while Mastercard rose 0.2%.


The settlement came one year after the federal appeals court in Manhattan upheld a $5.6 billion class action settlement with Visa and Mastercard, covering about 12 million merchants.

Some merchants opted out of that settlement and are pursuing separate lawsuits seeking damages.

Adam Levitin, a Georgetown University professor of law and finance, in an email said those merchants might object to Tuesday's settlement because it would bind them.

Levitin said U.S. merchants would still pay an average 219 basis point swipe fee, the highest in the developed world.

"If that's the result of nearly two decades of litigation, then the settlement is a huge loss for U.S. merchants," he said.

Tuesday's settlement requires approval by U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie in New York City's Brooklyn borough, likely not before late 2024 or early 2025, and appeals are possible.

"It's a bad deal for merchants," said Doug Kantor, general counsel of the National Association of Convenience Stores, in an interview. "It provides very small, very temporary relief, but afterward Mastercard and Visa will be free to raise rates, and the agreement doesn't provide a mechanism to slow an increase."

The Retail Industry Leaders Association, which represents businesses that employ more than 42 million Americans, said the settlement required closer review but amounted to "a mere drop in the bucket."


TD Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg wrote that small banks and credit unions may object because big retailers such as Walmart (NYSE:WMT) could cut deals with larger banks for cards that offer discounts at checkout.

But he said the accord reflects "extraordinary concessions" by Visa, Mastercard and banks because merchants can impose surcharges on airline and cash-back credit cards, though few may because they would rather complete sales than save on fees.

Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist and expert hired by the settling merchants, in an affidavit said the settlement could provide them with "very substantial" savings.

"Competition among merchants results in these cost savings being passed on to customers in the form of lower prices," Stiglitz added.

The plaintiffs' lawyers said Visa and Mastercard agreed to pay up to $170 million of their legal fees and expenses.

Some U.S. senators have promoted legislation, the Credit Card Competition Act, to let merchants process Visa and Mastercard credit cards through other payment networks.

© Reuters. A screen displays the company logo for Mastercard Inc. on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., February 29, 2024.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Darrin Peller, an analyst at Wolfe Research, wrote that Tuesday's settlement "likely takes some wind out of the sails" of that effort.

The case is In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No 05-md-01720.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.