Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Goldman evaluating role in China's Megvii IPO after U.S. blacklist

Stock MarketsOct 09, 2019 10:42AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
2/2 © Reuters. The Goldman Sachs company logo is seen in the company's space on the floor of the NYSE in New York 2/2

By Joshua Franklin and Julie Zhu

NEW YORK/HONG KONG (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc (N:GS) said on Tuesday it was reviewing its involvement in Megvii Technology Ltd's planned initial public offering after the U.S. government placed the Chinese artificial intelligence firm on a human rights blacklist.

The Trump administration said on Monday that Megvii and seven other Chinese companies were targeted because they were implicated in Beijing's repression of Muslim minority populations in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region in the far west of the country.

In an emailed statement in response to a request for comment on the Alibaba-backed Megvii IPO, Goldman said it was "evaluating in light of the recent developments".

Sources had previously told Reuters the listing was scheduled for Hong Kong in the fourth quarter and might raise as much as $1 billion.

Other U.S. companies involved with the blacklisted Chinese firms, whether as investors or as underwriters, are also likely to re-evaluate their relationships, risk consultants and Silicon Valley lawyers said.

Goldman is a joint sponsor of the Megvii IPO, alongside Citigroup Inc (N:C) and JPMorgan Chase & Co (N:JPM), which both declined to comment.

Megvii declined to comment on Goldman's statement but said that it was in close contact with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange about its IPO plans and would continue to monitor developments.

Goldman had thoroughly evaluated the Megvii deal before initially signing onto it using its usual due diligence process, a person familiar with the matter said.

Known for its facial recognition platform Face++, Megvii will become the first Chinese AI firm to go public if the deal goes ahead.

The company provides facial recognition and other AI technology to governments and companies including Alibaba (N:BABA), Ant Financial, Lenovo Group Ltd (HK:0992) and Huawei.


The U.S. Department of Commerce on Monday barred eight companies, as well as 20 Chinese government entities, from buying U.S. technology without U.S. government approval.

That will include high-powered computer chips made by U.S. companies such as Nvidia (O:NVDA), Intel (O:INTC) and Qualcomm (O:QCOM), which are considered critical for building and operating many AI systems.

The government said the entities were "implicated in human rights violations and abuses in the implementation of China's campaign of repression, mass arbitrary detention, and high-technology surveillance against Uighurs, Kazakhs, and other members of Muslim minority groups".

Megvii said it "strongly objects" to being added to the blacklist and there were "no grounds" for the designation. In a statement, it said around 1% of revenues were derived from Xinjiang in 2018 and none in the six months ended June 30.

It added that a May 2019 report from Human Rights Watch (HRW) on a surveillance app in Xinjiang had implicated Megvii's Face++, but in a corrected and reissued report, HRW did not highlight Megvii's name.

On Tuesday, the U.S. government imposed visa restrictions on Chinese government and Communist Party officials it believes responsible for the detention or abuse of Muslims in Xinjiang.

U.N. experts and activists say at least 1 million Uighurs, and members of other largely Muslim minority groups, have been detained in camps in the remote region.

Beijing denies any mistreatment at the camps, which it says provide vocational training to help stamp out religious extremism and teach new work skills.

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, who has been seeking to spotlight both the easy access that Chinese companies have been given to U.S. markets and human rights abuses in Xinjiang, said the government's move had been long overdue.

"We should continue to do more to hold Chinese government and Communist Party officials accountable for potential crimes against humanity being committed in Xinjiang," he said in a statement.


In recent years, Chinese and some foreign investors have poured money into startups that specialize in facial and voice recognition software, as well as other surveillance equipment and software. They have been buoyed by China's plans to build a ubiquitous CCTV surveillance network.

Another company on the U.S. government's blacklist, SenseTime, is among the world's most highly valued artificial intelligence firms and counts marquee U.S. technology investors Tiger Global and Silver Lake Partners among its backers. Fidelity, the U.S. mutual fund firm, is also a SenseTime investor, along with Qualcomm.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology said it will review its relationship with SenseTime, the first company to join the U.S. school's research effort into human and machine intelligence.

MIT will review all of existing relationships with organizations on the blacklist and "modify any interactions as necessary,", a spokeswoman said in an email.

Risk consultants say that investors and underwriters have jumped into the sector without fully assessing the dangers both to their reputations and to the valuations of the companies concerned.

"There has been a dearth of adequate due diligence performed on these companies from both a national security and a human rights perspective," said Roger Robinson, president and CEO of Washington DC-based risk consultancy RWR Advisory Group, and a former senior director of international economic affairs at the National Security Council.

He said that investors and others involved with these Chinese companies "may well be putting themselves at risk."

Silver Lake, Tiger Global and Qualcomm all declined to comment. Fidelity didn't immediately return a call seeking a comment.

"There will be a judgment call as to whether any U.S. investor would want to be associated with such businesses," said Rocky Lee, managing partner of the Silicon Valley office of law firm King & Wood Mallesons.

"I believe you will see some 'quiet' exiting by U.S. funds and possibly LPs, at least those U.S. investors who feel strongly that owning companies engaging in these activities are either immoral or politically incorrect."

Goldman evaluating role in China's Megvii IPO after U.S. blacklist

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (4)
Chris Sundo
Chris Sundo Oct 09, 2019 1:17AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
""..investors and others involved with these Chinese companies "may well be putting themselves at risk."" ---- Not only THAT but also US firms potentially never getting their money out again if the CCP decides to turn off the tap or block foreign capital outflows. Then the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) or equivalent needs to REQUIRE that ALL US CAPITAL INVESTED IN CHINA gets segregated on US companies' Financial Statements as a CHINA INVESTED CAPITAL position WITH A RISK OFFSET amount to ADJUST FOR FOREIGN CAPITAL OUTFLOW RISK. ---- Such segregation would surely bring down the market due to all companies invested in China simply currently being overvalued since no risk has been factored into the recoverability of any money put into China. --- With the CCP being Kleptomaniac and one hears has even asked Jack Ma to sign over his shares to CCP members there is a serious consideration to REVALUE ALL CAPITAL INVESTED IN CHINA and DISCLOSE THAT ON FIN. STATEMENTS ASAP.
Chris Sundo
Chris Sundo Oct 09, 2019 12:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
""...China's plans to build a ubiquitous CCTV surveillance network."" -- Couple that with a NO FACE MASK POLICY IN the HONG KONG DEMONSTRATIONS and you know who is being targeted next for crimes against free speech and crimes against HongKong humanity.
Jack Zhang
Jack_A Oct 09, 2019 12:17AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
it's more like a try to suppress China high-tech
Hank Williams
Hank Williams Oct 08, 2019 10:49PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
US laws have never applied to US banks. Do you think it's going to start now.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email