Breaking News
Get 40% Off 0
Is NVDA a 🟢 buy or 🔴 sell? Unlock Now

Attack on Canadian mining firm in Burkina Faso threatens gold’s final frontier

Published Nov 07, 2019 06:02PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. Women stand outside Bogodogo hospital in Ouagadougou
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio

By David Lewis, Helen Reid and Zandi Shabalala

NAIROBI/JOHANNESBURG/LONDON (Reuters) - As jihadists wreaked ever more havoc in the last two years, mining firms in Burkina Faso rolled out extra security measures, from barracks for government troops protecting them to safe rooms for workers behind barbed wire and mounds.

Expatriates generally fly in and out, while local staff still drive but in guarded convoys.

That has added millions of dollars to security costs for foreign companies, mainly from Canada and Australia, operating in the West African nation where industrial miners are forecast to produce 60 tonnes of gold this year.

Yet this week's attack on a convoy ferrying hundreds of local employees and contractors from a mine owned by Canada’s Semafo (TO:SMF) has exposed just how vulnerable firms still are.

At least 37 civilians died, with another 60 injured and dozens more feared missing.

Abandoned buses and pickups lay riddled with bullets. Bloodied bodies were slumped in the vehicles and on a red dirt road. Military reinforcements arrived but only after the lead escort vehicle was blown up, officials said.

"This is the deadliest incident targeting the mining industry, or any private businesses, in the Sahel since the 2013 In Amenas hostage crisis," said Vincent Rouget, an analyst at Control Risks Group, referring to an attack on a gas plant in the Algerian desert that killed dozens of foreign hostages.

There has been no claim for Wednesday's ambush, but the modus operandi – a bomb attack on military escorts followed by gunmen unleashing bullets – suggested the involvement of Islamist groups. They have been pushing south from strongholds in northern Mali to carry out attacks across much of Burkina Faso and parts of western Niger.

Over 1,000 people have been killed in Burkina Faso since 2016 and nearly 500,000 more have fled their homes, mainly this year. In this time, there have been dozens of attacks on industrial and small-scale mining operations.

It is an acute dilemma for miners.

The region is seen as the gold industry's final frontier, with large untapped reserves. Lured by relatively low-cost mining, firms have invested billions over the last decade - but expansion by al Qaeda and Islamic State-linked militants could force them to rethink.


"Because of the escalating security situation in Burkina, there are companies looking at decreasing their exposure to the country or leaving," said Bill Witham, the head of AAMEG, a body representing Australian resource companies in Africa.

"But the miners still see West Africa as a whole as quite a good investment."

Semafo's Toronto-listed shares dropped 10 percent after the attack. And major mines just over the borders in northern Ghana and Ivory Coast are now within striking distance of Islamist strongholds, experts warn.

Last year, AQIM, the main al Qaeda affiliate in West Africa, told followers Western companies, especially from France, were "legitimate targets".

Semafo, whose staff, contractors or escorts have been attacked three time in the last 18 months, declined to comment further, saying only that it had beefed up security since those episodes.

Eight other companies contacted by Reuters around the Sahel would not give details of their extra security costs.

West Africa has long been considered a risky prospect where political instability, volatile tax regimes and tricky relations with small-scale miners weigh heavily on boardrooms.

Yet government incentives and the potential to produce gold relatively cheaply led to over $7 billion invested in mining projects in the region between 2004 and 2018, according to a tally by S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI), a market intelligence company.

This peaked at $1.2 billion in 2012 alone, when gold prices were at an all-time high.

That year, al Qaeda-linked groups took over northern Mali but gold operations were unscathed as most mines are in the south, hundreds of kilometers away from militant strongholds.

Since then, France has deployed over 4,000 troops to the region, there is a 16,000-strong United Nations peacekeeping mission in Mali, and West African leaders have launched regional security initiatives. However, local armies are losing ground.

Since 2017, researchers documented at least 28 violent incidents at mines or involving mining workers in Burkina Faso, 17 of them this year, according to a Reuters analysis of data compiled by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project.

At least 12 of those events this year, which include attacks on workers, abductions and the use of improvised explosive devices, were linked to jihadists. Prior to Wednesday, at least 54 people had been killed in mining-related violence this year, five times as many as all of 2018.


This has forced the industry to accept that the threat has spread well beyond Niger’s northern deserts, where the likes of Frances's Areva have uranium mining operations and expatriates have been kidnapped, said Rouget.

In October 2018, France scrambled two jets to strike militants attacking a gold mine in northern Burkina Faso.

Earlier this year, Burkina Faso's government asked mining firms to help fund a rapid reaction unit with helicopters to respond to incidents like Wednesday's, but the initiative did not materialize, according to two people involved in meetings.

One company security official said his firm spent millions of dollars on armored vehicles, bullet-proof walls and safety rooms. "We are bracing for an In Amenas-style attack," he said.

However, some analysts believe mines still have sufficient defenses.

"The only thing that would shift the perception among gold miners that exposure to this insecurity is a risk worth taking is a direct attack on a mine site – an unlikely prospect," said Eric Humphery-Smith at risk consultancy Verisk (NASDAQ:VRSK) Maplecroft.

The top investor in Semafo said risk and gold mining went hand-in-hand, and extra security costs would not be a game-changer.

"Obviously it will add maybe a few dollars to the cost of producing an ounce of gold, but it is not going to change the overall economics," said Joe Foster, gold fund portfolio manager at VanEck Investment Management, which has a 10.1% stake in Semafo.

One immediate impact could be restrictions on how far afield firms are prepared to send geologists.

In May, Oumarou Idani, Burkina Faso’s minister of mines, identified exploration companies as high risk. "They work over large areas, sometimes 250 square kilometers ... it is difficult to have a secure way of working over that size of area."

Months earlier, Kirk Woodman, a Canadian geologist with 20 years' experience in the region, was kidnapped and found dead.

That was a "a big wakeup call", a former senior mining executive who is now an investor told Reuters.

"Miners are going to risk exploring further afield a lot less now," he said, asking not to be named. "This will affect how many new gold deposits are found."

(Map of attack:

(David Lewis in Nairobi, Helen Reid in Johannesburg, and Zandi Shabalala and Ryan McNeill in London; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne)

Attack on Canadian mining firm in Burkina Faso threatens gold’s final frontier

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your profile, will be public on and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Buzzy Jefferson
Buzzy Jefferson Nov 07, 2019 7:54PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Ironic that Canada tries to lecture the world on climate and ecology while their mining industry is NUMBER ONE at ******the planet. Hypocrites.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email