Get 40% Off
🚀 Our AI Picked 6 Stocks that Jumped +25% in Q1. Which Picks Will Soar in Q2?Unlock full list

US judge in Texas rules congressional passage of 2022 spending bill unconstitutional

Published 02/27/2024, 05:55 PM
Updated 02/27/2024, 09:11 PM
© Reuters.

By Nate Raymond

(Reuters) -A federal judge in Texas on Tuesday ruled that a $1.7 trillion government funding bill was unconstitutionally passed in 2022 through a pandemic-era rule that allowed lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives to vote by proxy rather than in person.

U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix in Lubbock reached that conclusion as he granted Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's request to block a provision of that bill that gave pregnant workers stronger legal protections.

The judge, an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump, called the scope of his ruling "limited," and said it did not block all of the spending law. Texas had only sought to block two provisions ultimately.

Hendrix blocked one provision, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, from being enforced against the state after finding the bill was wrongly passed. That law requires employers to provide pregnant workers with reasonable accommodations.

He issued an injunction barring the U.S. Department of Justice and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from enforcing that provision in cases involving state government employees. His order did not apply to other workers in Texas.

The Justice Department, which defended the bill on behalf of Democratic President Joe Biden's administration, declined to comment.

Paxton, in a lawsuit filed last year, argued the spending package enacted in December 2022 was unconstitutionally passed as more than half of the House, then led by Democrats, were not physically present to provide quorum and voted by proxy.

Then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi helped implement the proxy voting rule in May 2020 following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic as an emergency measure. It was ditched when Republicans took control of the House following the 2022 elections after an earlier unsuccessful court challenge.

In a 120-page ruling, Hendrix said that for over two centuries before the "novel" proxy voting rule's adoption, Congress understood that the Constitution's quorum clause required a majority of members of the House or Senate to be physically present to have quorum to pass legislation.

"Supreme Court precedent has long held that the Quorum Clause requires presence, and the Clause's text distinguishes those absent members from the quorum and provides a mechanism for obtaining a physical quorum by compelling absent members to attend," he wrote.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The U.S. Capitol is seen as Congress continues work on passing a $1.66 trillion government funding bill in Washington, U.S., December 21, 2022. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

Paxton in a statement said he was "relieved the court upheld the Constitution," saying Pelosi "abused proxy voting under the pretext of COVID-19 to pass this law, then Biden signed it, knowing they violated the Constitution."

While Hendrix ruled in Texas' favor, he found the state lacked standing to challenge $20 million appropriated in the bill to fund a pilot program that provided voluntary case management and other services to  noncitizens in immigration removal proceedings.

 

Latest comments

Forget the March deadline, Congress is going to have to get busy and re-write the 2022 budget.  They went against the Constitutional rules by voting by proxy.  Sorry, Jezebel (Pelosi), you do not get to write your own rules!
Meaningless as they only court that can decide constitutionality is the US supreme court. A bozo trump judge can't.
This is not accurate. Any judge or court can make a ruling on Constitutionality. The Supreme Court can uphold or overturn those rulings.
if you don't like the bill, cancel it all.
You think US lawmaking operates like Netflix?
typical Republican bs. pick and choose whatever they want.
unhinged..coming from Jake who supports Donald Trump the president that said injecting bleach cures COVID,; to vote for a man like that, you'd have to be unhinged..
I never said any of that - all came out of your deluded mind. Brainwashed degenerate.
PS You proved my point - you’re not intelligent enough to realize that youve dug in based on a false dichotomy.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.