Get 40% Off
🔥 This hedge fund gained 26.16% in the last month. Get their top stocks with our free stock ideas tool.See stock ideas

US House Speaker Johnson floats two-step measure to avert gov't shutdown

Published 11/11/2023, 06:08 AM
Updated 11/11/2023, 08:00 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Newly-elected U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) walks from his office to the House floor at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., October 26, 2023.REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger
MCO
-

By David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson unveiled a Republican stopgap spending measure on Saturday aimed at averting a government shutdown a week from now, but the measure quickly ran into opposition from lawmakers from both parties in Congress.

Unlike ordinary continuing resolutions, or "CRs," that fund federal agencies for a specific period, the measure announced by Johnson would fund some parts of the government until Jan. 19 and others until Feb. 2. House Republicans hope to pass the measure on Tuesday.

"This two-step continuing resolution is a necessary bill to place House Republicans in the best position to fight for conservative victories," Johnson said in a statement after announcing the plan to House Republicans in a conference call.

The House Republican stopgap contained no supplemental funding such as aid for Israel or Ukraine.

The House and Democratic-led Senate must agree on a spending vehicle that President Joe Biden can sign into law by Friday, or risk a fourth partial government shutdown in a decade that would close national parks, disrupt pay for as many as 4 million federal workers and disrupt a swath of activities from financial oversight to scientific research.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a release that the proposal was "just a recipe for more Republican chaos and more shutdowns." She said "House Republicans are wasting precious time with an unserious proposal that has been panned by members of both parties."

Johnson, the top Republican in Congress, unveiled his stopgap a day after Moody's (NYSE:MCO), the last major credit ratings agency to maintain a top "AAA" rating on the U.S. government, lowered its outlook on the nation's credit to "negative" from "stable," citing political polarization in Congress on spending as a danger to the nation's fiscal health.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The Louisiana Republican appeared to be appealing to two warring House Republican factions: hardliners who wanted legislation with multiple end-dates; and centrists who had called for a "clean" stopgap measure free of spending cuts and conservative policy riders that Democrats reject.

The legislation would extend funding for military construction, veterans benefits, transportation, housing, urban development, agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration and energy and water programs through Jan. 19. Funding for all other federal operations would expire on Feb. 2.

But the plan quickly came under fire from members of both parties.

"My opposition to the clean CR just announced by the Speaker to the @HouseGOP cannot be overstated," Representative Chip Roy, a member of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, said on the social media platform X.

"It's a 100% clean. And I 100% oppose," wrote Roy, who had called for the new measure to include spending cuts.

Democratic Senator Brian Schatz called Johnson's measure "super convoluted," adding that "all of this nonsense costs taxpayer money."

"We are going to pass a clean short term CR. The only question is whether we do it stupidly and catastrophically or we do it like adults," Schatz wrote on X.

A stopgap measure would give lawmakers more time to implement full-scale appropriations bills to fund the government through Sept. 30.

Johnson put Democrats on notice that failure to reach agreement on 2024 spending would prompt House Republicans to implement "a full-year CR with appropriate adjustments to meet our national security priorities."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

House Republican hardliners have been pushing to cut fiscal 2024 spending below the $1.59 trillion level that Biden and Johnson's predecessor agreed in the May deal that averted default. But even that is a small slice of the overall federal budget, which also includes mandatory outlays for Social Security and Medicare, and topped $6.1 trillion in fiscal 2023.

Johnson, who won the speaker's gavel less than three weeks ago, could put his own political future at risk if his current plan fails to win support for passage and he is forced to go with a standard CR that Democrats can accept.

His predecessor, Kevin McCarthy, was ousted from the job by eight Republican hardliners early last month, after he moved a bipartisan measure to avert a shutdown on Oct. 1, when fiscal 2024 began. McCarthy opted for the bipartisan route after hardliners blocked a Republican stopgap measure with features intended to appease them.

Latest comments

There's really only one way to fix the deficit. We need a wealth tax on anyone with over a billion dollars. the cuts just aren't there. It doesn't help you to have enough wealth for the next 10 thousand generations if the country rolls over and ends as a nation. Sure, you'll own all the wealth in the world. But when the world ends in 20-30 years, what good is a fat bank account?
Gold is a win win.
buy bonds!
it's simple, don't spend more than you take in. cuts are definitely appropriate.
tell that to Trump 8 Trillion plan that flew through GOP goons
MAGA
Retrumplicans are not just trying to cut future spending w/ new spending bills or amend passed spending bills; they're refusing to pay for what's already in passed spending bills.
No more money for Biden’s wars.
Warm Camp, the master of misunderstanding.
Warm camp cozy up to Putin rear
MAGA
Republicans Stop this madness do your work and approve the government funding every dollar spent has already been approved before. No thanks to MAGA nuts trying to bring down USA
WOW !!! BRAINWASHING AT IT'S FINEST!!
Yup.  Instead of just refusing to pay for what's already in passed spending bills, should be passing new spending bills.
Hello
In this grand theater of the absurd,Where often, reason’s pleas go unheard,The currency of power reigns supreme,In corridors where war-lit dreams ever gleam.
Most of those "halls" and "corridors" exists outside the US.
This dance of dollars, endless, vast,Shadows over futures cast,In whispered halls, they all agree,To spend on war, in unity.
Tax the Churchs.. Problem solved
If history is any guide, Congress will choose the easiest way out. Those hoping for fiscal sanity will be sorely disappointed.
But they found a true Trumplafuk in deep South
Trumplagoon Found
End welfare
-Don't use it as an effort to jam somebody,-.....if you like that statement, then there no need for different parties in the House.  Both sides are supposed to stick it to one another as that's how each member tries to appease the people that voted them in. I guess it's called POLITICS.
GOP dead Thanks Mr Trump
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.