Breaking News
Get 40% Off 0
🔎 See NVDA's full ProTips for an instant risks or rewards Claim 40% OFF

Analysis-Finance leaders stumble on Israel-Gaza war shock as IMF, World Bank advance reforms

Published Oct 16, 2023 01:03AM ET Updated Oct 16, 2023 05:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. Smoke rises in the air following Israeli bombings in Gaza, as seen from Israel's border with the Gaza Strip, in southern Israel October 15, 2023. REUTERS/Amir Cohen

By Andrea Shalal and David Lawder

MARRAKECH, Morocco (Reuters) -Global finance leaders' paralysis in coming to grips with the fallout from the Hamas attack and Israel's response last week exposed deep geopolitical divisions hampering the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, even as they advanced new funding plans aimed at easing more-frequent economic shocks.

Hamas launched its unprecedented attack on Israel on Oct. 7, just as top finance officials arrived in Morocco for the IMF and World Bank annual meetings, upending the gathering's carefully crafted script calling for new resources and steps to revive flagging global growth.

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva did not mention the new conflict at opening events. Later, as Israel's retaliatory strikes mounted, she struggled to address it, describing it as a human tragedy but a vague source of economic uncertainty.

In private conversations at the meetings, the Israel-Gaza conflict's implications were front and center, from a new refugee crisis to trade impacts and the threat of fighting in Lebanon and the West Bank, participants from finance groups to non-profits told Reuters.

"In the face of a major global shock like this that’s human created, that's not a climate shock, these institutions are impotent to do anything about it, which is why they’re not even talking about it," said Rachel Nadelman, a senior research fellow at American University’s Accountability Research Center, who attended civil society and official events at the meetings.

The inability to respond extended to chair's statements issued by the IMF and World Bank steering committees, once again unable to issue joint communiques amid deepening geopolitical tensions, most recently over Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but also disputes between the United States and China.

The Group of 20 major economies did reach consensus on an official communique but omitted any mention of the Israel-Hamas war.

A G20 official said that body has been riven for two years by the Ukraine war, with a communique only possible after a meeting of U.S. President Joe Biden and China's Xi Jinping.

"The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is even more controversial - almost impossible to reach consensus," the official said.

A senior U.S. Treasury official said the human tragedy was in the foreground at the moment, not the economic consequences, and Russia's war remained the primary driver of geopolitical instability in the global arena. "First and foremost this is a human tragedy," the official said.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS OVERSHADOWED

World Bank President Ajay Banga acknowledged on Sunday that the Israel-Gaza conflict, along with the Ukraine war and fighting in Africa, were "casting long shadows" over the meeting's accomplishments and adding to economic challenges.

"Without peace, it's hard for people to get stability, growth, look after their children, get jobs," he said.

Senior World Bank Group officials were more pointed in a statement to staff, saying they were "shocked and appalled by the unprecedented escalation of violence in Israel and Gaza."

"We condemn terrorism in all forms, including the abhorrent targeting of innocent civilians and kidnapping," the leaders of the World Bank, the International Finance Corp and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, said in an internal statement seen by Reuters.

The World Bank's governing body approved a new vision statement "to create a world free of poverty on a livable planet" to incorporate its new mission to fight climate change, pandemics and fragile states, along with new steps to expand lending.

The IMF's steering committee agreed to boost quota funding by year-end, leaving the door open to doing so without adjusting its shareholding structure to give China more votes, while a $3 billion fundraising goal for its poor-country trust fund was met.

But conflicts remain the biggest challenge to the global economy, said Josh Lipsky, a former IMF official who directs the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center.

"If these institutions are going to be legitimate and fit-for-purpose for the coming decade, they're going to have to respond to geopolitical crises in close to real time," he told Reuters.

"Geopolitical shocks are economic shocks now and economic shocks are geopolitical shocks - and they're trying to detach the two."

Analysis-Finance leaders stumble on Israel-Gaza war shock as IMF, World Bank advance reforms
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Roger Miller
Roger Miller Oct 16, 2023 6:07PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
These central planners rarely make things better.  Free markets, allowing people to freely trade without government meddling, is what increases our quality of life.  Not bureaucrats intervening in our lives with misguided policies and funneling away capital from the markets.  Not to mention that supporting these elitist bureaucrats are just one more financial burden all citizens must bear, and cost much more than multimillion dollar CEO salaries.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Oct 16, 2023 6:07PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Its not a binary choice between your dogma and a civilized world. A bank backstopped by developed nations to help undeveloped nations advance economically is seen as a reasonable and beneficial endeavor for our modern world. It certainly is in the interest of international stability not to have populations living in economic deprivation - and it supports free enterprise.
Derick Lim
Derick Lim Oct 16, 2023 3:06AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
OMG..... World Bank and IMF are LGBTQ.......
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email