Breaking News
Get 40% Off 0
Is NVDA a 🟢 buy or 🔴 sell? Unlock Now

Analysis-Big losses in Russia-linked stocks have investors rethinking other depositary receipts

Published Aug 14, 2023 01:05AM ET Updated Aug 14, 2023 01:11AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Russian rouble banknote is seen in front of a descending and rising stock graph in this illustration taken March 1, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
 
C
+0.60%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
GS
+0.13%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Sinead Cruise and Carolina Mandl

LONDON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Global investors are losing confidence in securities linked to shares of companies in the world's geopolitical hot spots, investors and analysts said, after Moscow moved to de-list Russian depositary receipts from foreign exchanges in retaliation for Western sanctions over the war in Ukraine.

Moscow's actions have deprived many foreign investors of the ability to trade in Russian securities, including depositary receipts. Investors are worried about future copycat actions by other governments who might look to reduce foreign influence over their leading companies.

Depositary receipts, or DRs, are certificates issued by a bank representing shares in a foreign company traded on a local stock exchange.

DRs reduce currency and liquidity risk for buyers, who see them as one of the surest ways to invest in companies in countries ranging from Brazil to China.

But events in Russia have forced many investors to write down the value of depositary receipts of Russian companies to zero, given their inability to trade them. Investors and analysts now wonder if future geopolitical tensions could lead to similar reactions by other governments and if those risks are accurately reflected by current prices.

"Political instability and rapidly shifting geopolitical alliances can, in a very short amount of time, result in frozen and inaccessible capital," Peter C. Earle, economist with American Institute for Economic Research, told Reuters.

"It's long past time for investors to begin to consider the intersection between three variables: the size of their exposure to foreign securities, the likely return on those issues over time, and the potential for conflict," Earle said.

Data from Citigroup (NYSE:C) shows $2 trillion in DRs were traded in the first half of 2023. Companies raised $4.7 billion in the first half of this year, versus $2.8 billion in the same period of 2022, from selling DRs, according to Citi. Activity was muted last year following a downturn in the overall equity markets.

Among the 10 most traded DR programs in 2022, five were issued by Chinese companies.

"Portfolio globalization and diversification continues despite geopolitical concerns in select markets and sectors," Citigroup told Reuters at the end of July. CONSEQUENCES

Loss of confidence in DRs could drain needed foreign capital from firms in emerging economies, for instance. Some advisers said global banks that issue DRs should better spell out potential risks to investors, who tend to buy DRs for global portfolios offering diversified exposure to several companies and countries.

Investors seeking to outperform broad stock market returns should still consider eliminating or reducing exposure to countries at war, or unstable governments, some advisers said.

"The geopolitical risk of owning a GDR (global depositary receipt) right now is under-appreciated by most western investors ... GDRs should now be viewed as riskier, investors should reassess allocation levels and require a risk premium," said Christopher Day, managing director of U.S.-based Doliver Advisors, which manages around $500 million in assets for high net worth individuals.Michael Ashley Schulman, partner, chief investment officer at Running Point Capital Advisors, said some individuals may have "missed or forgotten the legal and jurisdictional exposure of GDRs", since thrown into sharp relief by turmoil in Russia.

In Moscow, a court on Aug. 7 sequestered all Russian stocks owned by Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) III SICAV fund, including its 5% stake in Russia's largest toy retailer, Detsky Mir, at the request of Otkrytie bank, which says Goldman owes it 615 million roubles, court documents showed.

Otkrytie said Goldman Sachs cited sanctions introduced by the United States and Britain over Moscow's war in Ukraine in failing to settle the debt. Goldman declined to comment.

"GDRs have always faced political and regulatory risk —this has always been a known hazard— but investors are just now getting another wakeup call or reminder of this possibility," said Schulman, who advises wealthy families on capital allocation.

Moscow's sudden shakedown turned one of the most appealing features of DRs into a major flaw: investors own the shares only indirectly, said Grzegorz Drozdz, market analyst at investment firm Conotoxia Ltd.

"There is always the threat of a possible ban or restriction of trading in such instruments on GDRs listed in other jurisdictions," he said.

Malcolm Dorson, senior portfolio manager at Global X, which manages around $40 billion in assets, said he believed Russia was an extreme case and losses sustained by Russian DR holders were unlikely to trigger a lengthy retreat from other DR markets globally.

But investors would be wise to review their risk tolerance.

"Big picture, DR programs do carry slightly more risk than a regular equity security because of that additional layer between the companies and investors," he said.

"In a normal situation, governments and the companies under their jurisdictions are actually incentivized to keep DR investors happy because DRs allow international investors to access markets, and hence provide these companies access to capital and investment into their countries."

Analysis-Big losses in Russia-linked stocks have investors rethinking other depositary receipts
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email