Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Reveal Undervalued Stocks Hiding in Any Market Get Started

Binance's "proof of reserves" raises doubts about elusive Mazars report

Cryptocurrency Dec 12, 2022 05:16AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters
 
BTC/USD
+0.53%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

Investing.com - In the wake of FTX's bankruptcy, CZ, the boss of Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange platform by trading volumes, floated the idea of "proof of reserves," urging exchange platforms to disclose details of their reserves to reassure about their financial health.

Binance had subsequently disclosed some unaudited details of its reserves - the December 7 release of an independent report by Mazars, which was presented as evidence that the CZ platform will not follow the same path as Sam Bankman-Fried.

Mazars' report on Binance's Bitcoin reserves has grey areas

According to experts interviewed by the Wall Street Journal, this report does not only contain reassuring elements. It has raised what could be described as red flags in Binance's finances.

In particular, the Mazars report was criticized for its lack of information related to the quality of internal controls and the method used by Binance's systems to liquidate assets as part of the margin loan coverage.

WSJ sources also expressed concern about the lack of information about Binance's corporate structure. Notably, Binance's Chief Strategy Officer, Patrick Hillmann, was reportedly unable to name Binance's parent company, arguing that the company has been in the midst of a reorganization for nearly two years.

Experts the newspaper spoke to also complained that Binance's evidence of reserves shows that client funds are 97% secured, excluding assets lent to users through loans or margin accounts. In fact, the 1:1 ratio of reserves to client assets advocated by Binance has not been met, at least according to the WSJ's calculations based on the figures in the Mazars report.

Binance's customer funds guaranteed at 97% or 101%, depending on the calculation method

In contrast, "with the inclusion of In-Scope Assets lent to customers through margin and loans which are overcollateralized by Out-Of-Scope Assets, we found that Binance was 101% collateralized," Mazars said.

Specifically, the Mazars report presented three figures, denominated in bitcoin, including the "Customer Liability Balance Report," with a balance of 597,602 bitcoins and the "Asset Balance Report," with a balance of 582,486 bitcoins, representing a client asset coverage of 97.4%.

The third figure, the "Net liability balance (excluding In-Scope Assets lent to customers)," showed a liability figure adjusted downward by about 21,860 bitcoins to 575,742 bitcoins. And the calculation on that basis does indeed say that Binance's customer funds are 101% backed by reserves.

Binance spokeswoman Jessica Jung said that the difference of 21,860 bitcoins was "made up of BTC loans made to customers through the Binance loan program" and that "the collateral for said loans are not in BTC, but in other currencies."

Note that the reasons for the adjustment could be related to the fact that the Mazars report focused solely on bitcoin, purposely emitting all other cryptocurrencies.

However, Binance has stated that it will start publishing information about other cryptocurrencies available on its platform and related reserves in the coming weeks.

So we'll have to wait a little longer before we get a complete and realistic picture of the company's financial strength.

(Translated from French)

Binance's "proof of reserves" raises doubts about elusive Mazars report
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email