
Please try another search
The Digital Asset Investor, a popular Twitter account claimed to be for entertainment, retweeted the post of Ryan Selkis, the founder and CEO of the market intelligence platform Messari, in which the latter posited the necessity of the US to “ban or restrict” crypto seizure. The Digital Asset Investor asserted that if a “tyrannical government” decides to seize crypto, it would adopt ways to either make the investors part with it or make the asset “not worth having”.
Notably, the Digital Asset Investor, tweeted on March 19, that the “Endgame question” is always regarding the possibility of either keeping the assets or even being rewarded:
It doesn't matter if you control the private keys. If a tyrannical government decides you can't have an asset there are many ways to make you part with it or make it not worth having. He knowsThe End Game question has always been…will we be allowed to keep it or at… https://t.co/rDTzsFn1Or pic.twitter.com/mlmxnztDme— Digital Asset Investor (@digitalassetbuy) March 18, 2023
On March 18, Selkis shared a Twitter post reiterating that he is no longer confident that “private property seizures are impossible”, adding:
There are a lot of Americans who would like Congress to explicitly guarantee that it is illegal for the executive branch to seize Bitcoin, Gold & other commodities, and other financial property w/out due process.
As a response to Selkis’ tweet, Gordon Gekko, the chief architect of the meta governance protocol PowerPool, commented that an additional right should be included in the Bill of Rights; the Congress should never invent laws that would hinder the individual’s right to “freely manage digital assets on decentralized public ledgers”.
Significantly, on March 16, Selkis tweeted about certain concerns that Congress should consider including the restrictions on crypto asset possession as well as digital asset development and security:
Congress should:1. Oppose any and all efforts to ban or restrict the use or personal possession of Bitcoin and other digital assets.2. Oppose any and all efforts to unfairly target or impede the development, accessibility, and security of Bitcoin and other digital asset tech.— Ryan Selkis (@twobitidiot) March 16, 2023
Interstingly, the Messari CEO pointed out that Congress should strongly oppose any initiatives taken against the possession of crypto, adding that all “efforts to unfairly target or impede the development, accessibility and security” of digital assets should be controlled by Congress.
While the Digital Asset Investor retweeted the content of Selkis, the US crypto aspirants responded actively showcasing Congress’ obligation in supporting the crypto industry. There were many tweeters who commented that it’s better to find other nations if the US stands hostile to crypto.
The post American Crypto Investors Strongly Need Congress to Support Crypto appeared first on Coin Edition.
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.