Sign up to create alerts for Instruments,
Economic Events and content by followed authors
Free Sign Up Already have an account? Sign In
Andrew carson
Sep 10, 2020 2:43PM ET
🥴👎
1
0
Quotes
All Instrument Types
- All Instrument Types
- Indices
- Equities
- ETFs
- Funds
- Commodities
- Currencies
- Crypto
- Bonds
- Certificates
Please try another search
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details
Senate polarized over next coronavirus aid package
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate leaders on Wednesday held onto their radically different positions on what is needed to address the continuing fallout from the coronavirus pandemic, one day before a vote on a modest Republican bill that appeared destined for defeat.
The Republican bill, unveiled on Tuesday, would provide around $300 billion in new aid for schools, businesses, medical supplies and other coronavirus-related costs. It was drastically scaled down from a $1 trillion plan Republicans offered in July and far from the more than $3 trillion Democrats have been pushing.
Democrats are expected to block the Republican bill from advancing, arguing that there is nothing bipartisan about it and that it falls far short of the nation's needs during a pandemic that has killed nearly 190,000 people in the United States and brought massive job losses.
"Do you want to do something? Or do you want to do nothing?" Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican, said in a speech in which he said Thursday's vote would "expose" Democrats' "obstruction."
"They (Democrats) do not want any bipartisan relief whatsoever to reach American families prior to the election" on Nov. 3, McConnell said.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer countered: "It is impossible to look at this GOP proposal and not wonder - 'Do our Republican friends see the damage in America?'"
He listed a series of shortcomings in the Republican bill, including the lack of food and rental assistance, aid to state and local governments whose revenues have fallen during the pandemic and more money for election security at a time when Americans worry about traveling to voting centers for fear of becoming infected with the novel coronavirus.
Despite the dissonance between the two parties, Schumer held out hope for an eventual compromise.
In an interview with CNN, he said there was "a good chance" of a coronavirus aid bill being enacted into law once Republicans realize Democrats will not go along with an "emaciated" legislative response.
But it was unclear whether any such deal would emerge anytime soon after a series of negotiations between the White House and congressional Democrats sputtered.
Related Articles
Canada's Trudeau hammers main election rival's COVID-19 approach
By Reuters - Sep 16, 2021
By Steve Scherer MONTREAL (Reuters) -Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, seeking to carve out a lead ahead of a Sept. 20 election, on Thursday accused his main rival of...
Cuban leader visits Mexico for new Latin America 'pink tide' summit
By Reuters - Sep 16, 2021
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel attended a lavish military parade at Mexico's 200th anniversary of independence on Thursday, ahead of a summit that will...
Delhi orders ban on pollutive firecrackers ahead of Diwali to 'save lives'
By Reuters - Sep 16, 2021
(Corrects to remove extraneous word from headline) By Neha Arora and Saurabh Sharma NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Delhi authorities ordered a ban on the storage, use and sale of...
Comments (11)
Michael Natan
Sep 09, 2020 3:31PM ET
Dems wont help the American people just to spite Trump. It’s so sad! We need term limits for these politicians!
2
3
Michael Natan
Sep 09, 2020 3:31PM ET
Reuters bot with the thumbs down!
1
1
Cody Parsons
Sep 09, 2020 3:31PM ET
yes Obama era GOP tactics. thanks to them changing the game to " obstruct everything, compromise never" tactics and polarizing everything. not everything is black and white. the death of the moderate is the death of democracy
0
0
Anthony Badalamenti
Sep 09, 2020 3:31PM ET
They need a beating
1
0
Me comment
Sep 09, 2020 2:45PM ET
Repo to little to late.
0
0
Clinton Ronnenberg
Sep 09, 2020 2:12PM ET
Just skip the stimulus package and reopen already.
0
1
bryan cooper
Sep 09, 2020 2:12PM ET
you know that will never happen. govs and mayors have tasted unlimited power. that is wild animals tasting blood. once they taste they become addicted to it.
0
0
Jim Robertson
Sep 09, 2020 12:58PM ET
wow they edit b l o w.
0
0
Jim Robertson
Sep 09, 2020 12:57PM ET
Oh Chuck Schumer, your my favorite cheerleader. ****fast Pelosi.
0
0
Muhamed Jaffir
Sep 09, 2020 11:17AM ET
Bailing out state and local governments from their poor decision making is a non starter. They want one trillion for that. most of which would go to 3-7 states. It is laughable.
1
1
Andrew carson
Sep 09, 2020 10:24AM ET
Leave the radical demands at the door 🚪
1
2
Kaveh Sun
Sep 09, 2020 9:47AM ET
300 bil? The house is asking for 3000 bil. Will it pass the house? If it will, then Pelosi played games.
0
0
Kelly Mayer
Sep 09, 2020 9:43AM ET
Deceiving left propaganda.
3
2
bryan cooper
Sep 09, 2020 9:30AM ET
just a bargaining ploy like the $3 trillion dem bill. neither party expects their proposal to pass. they are first moves in a high-stakes chess game.
1
0
Tre Hsi
Sep 09, 2020 9:30AM ET
both sides are bluffing, lets see who blinks first
1
0
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
Report this comment
I feel that this comment is:
Comment flagged
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for reviewDisclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.
Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.