Get 40% Off
🚀 Our AI Picked 6 Stocks that Jumped +25% in Q1. Which Picks Will Soar in Q2?Unlock full list

White House pauses decision on Louisiana LNG export terminal -New York Times

Published 01/24/2024, 01:51 PM
Updated 01/24/2024, 05:02 PM
© Reuters. Snow covered transfer lines are seen at the Dominion Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal in Lusby, Maryland March 18, 2014. REUTERS/Gary Cameron/File Photo

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Biden administration is delaying a decision on a Louisiana liquefied natural gas (LNG) export project that would be the United States' largest, but which has raised the ire of environmentalists, the New York Times reported on Wednesday.

With an export capacity of around 20 million metric tonnes per year, Venture Global LNG's Calcasieu Pass 2 (CP2) project would be twice the size of the company's present CP plant. If built, it would make Venture Global one of the largest LNG companies in the world.

The White House is directing the Department of Energy (DOE), which decides whether LNG exports are in the "public interest" to expand a review of LNG export projects to include more climate change criteria, the Times said, citing three unnamed sources familiar with the matter. The review could lead to delays of another 16 proposed LNG export projects, it said.

Press officials at the White House and DOE did not have an immediate comment on the report.

A delay of a decision on CP2 until after the Nov. 5 U.S. presidential election could spare the White House from criticism from environmentalists, who form an important part of President Joe Biden's base. Climate activists say new LNG projects lock in global reliance on fossil fuels for decades, and lead to emissions not just from burning gas but also from leaks of the powerful greenhouse gas methane.

Venture Global said the report was worrying if true.

“Such an action would shock the global energy market, having the impact of an economic sanction, and send a devastating signal to our allies that they can no longer rely on the United States," said Shaylyn Hynes, a company spokesperson.

European countries have sharply increased their LNG purchases from the United States since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, as part of an effort to diversify its energy sources.

Venture Global and other LNG companies have also argued the expansion of U.S. LNG exports can help reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions by displacing coal in Asia and other parts of the world.

CP2 needs approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), a panel of three energy regulators that has traditionally approved most LNG projects. It also needs approval from the DOE in order to ship to countries with which the U.S. does not have a free trade agreement, including some of the largest markets in the European Union and Asia.

Any moratorium on LNG export approvals could delay investment decisions by companies proposing new facilities, said Alex Munton, director of global gas and LNG research at consulting firm Rapidan Energy Group.

"There are no pre-FID (final investment decision) projects that have a clear regulatory path forward and so without that path, it will delay FIDs until next year at earliest," Munton told Reuters on Wednesday.

Environmentalists cheered the report.

© Reuters. Snow covered transfer lines are seen at the Dominion Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal in Lusby, Maryland March 18, 2014. REUTERS/Gary Cameron/File Photo

"Putting a stop to expanded gas exports is one of the most important moves President Biden could make on addressing the climate crisis," said Ben Jealous, head of the Sierra Club.

Commonwealth LNG, which has been waiting 14 months after receiving its environmental permit, declined to comment. It has hoped to start construction on its Cameron, Louisiana, project late this year with preliminary deals for exports of 5 million metric tons a year.

Latest comments

environmentalists want to stop one of the cleanest fuels we have but won't speak about the impact on wild life these solar farms have. Shows you, it's about money, not the environment
Would the detriment to the environment here, from such a project, be minimal campared to other countries reliance on coal snd oil because they cant get LNG, sustaining a larger polluter. Net positive for planet?
the USA is already eating Saudi Arabia and Russia's lunch as far as energy production is concerned..
Approve the LNG. Stip ceding markets to russia.
if we don't sell it someone else will. we can do a better job producing it here to produce less emissions and treat workers better. dems only are fooled by the counties who want our business and in reality will cause more waste and pollution
keep on rubbing your hands with red herrings and misinformation, America is the largest energy producer on the planet..
Woke government..
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.