Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

U.S. blames Iran for tanker attacks in Gulf of Oman, Iran rejects assertion

Published 06/13/2019, 09:57 PM
Updated 06/13/2019, 09:57 PM
© Reuters. An Iranian navy boat tries to stop the fire of an oil tanker after it was attacked in the Gulf of Oman

By Lisa Barrington and Lesley Wroughton

DUBAI/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States blamed Iran for attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman on Thursday that drove up oil prices (LCOc1) and raised concerns about a new U.S.-Iranian confrontation, but Tehran bluntly denied the allegation.

It was not immediately clear what befell the Norwegian-owned Front Altair or the Japanese-owned Kokuka Courageous, which both experienced explosions, forcing crews to abandon ship and leave the vessels adrift in waters between Gulf Arab states and Iran.

One source said the blast on the Front Altair, which caught fire and sent a huge plume of smoke into the air, may have been caused by a magnetic mine. The firm that chartered the Kokuka Courageous tanker said it was hit by a suspected torpedo, but a person with knowledge of the matter said torpedoes were not used.

On Thursday night, U.S. Central Command spokesman Bill Urban released a video of what the U.S. military said was an Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp Gashti Class patrol boat approaching the Kokuka Courageous "and was observed and recorded removing (an) unexploded limpet mine from the M/T Kokuka Courageous."

The tanker attack will not affect Japanese energy supply, Japanese Industry Minister Hiroshige Seko said, although the ministry issued a warning to Japanese energy companies.

Crude oil prices spiked more than 4% after the attacks near the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial shipping artery for Saudi Arabia and other Gulf energy producers. Prices later settled about 2% higher. [O/R] Brent crude (LCOc1) was down by 0.4% at $61.06 a barrel in early Asia trading.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The United States, which has accused Iran or its proxies of carrying out a May 12 attack on four tankers off the United Arab Emirates' coast as well as May 14 drone strikes on two Saudi oil-pumping stations, squarely blamed Iran for Thursday's attacks.

"It is the assessment of the United States government that the Islamic Republic of Iran is responsible for the attacks that occurred in the Gulf of Oman today," U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo https://www.reuters.com/article/mideast-tanker-usa/update-1-u-s-top-diplomat-says-u-s-believes-iran-behind-attacks-on-oman-gulf-tankers-idUSL2N23K18H told reporters.

Pompeo did not provide explicit evidence to back up the U.S. assertion.

"This assessment is based on intelligence, the weapons used, the level of expertise needed to execute the operation, recent similar Iranian attacks on shipping, and the fact that no proxy group operating in the area has the resources and proficiency to act with such a high degree of sophistication," Pompeo said.

Iran "categorically rejects the U.S. unfounded claim with regard to 13 June oil tanker incidents and condemns it in the strongest possible terms," the Iranian mission to the United Nations said in a statement on Thursday evening.

It accused the United States and its regional allies, which include Iranian rival Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, of "warmongering." Iran called on "the international community to live up to its responsibilities in preventing the reckless and dangerous policies and practices of the U.S. and its regional allies in heightening the tensions in the region."

U.S. and European security officials as well as regional analysts cautioned against jumping to conclusions about who carried out the attacks, leaving open the possibility that Iranian proxies, or someone else entirely, might have been responsible.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In London, British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the UK was taking the matter "extremely seriously" and that if Iran was involved, "it is a deeply unwise escalation which poses a real danger to the prospects of peace and stability in the region."

'SUSPICIOUS'

Tensions between Iran and the United States have risen since U.S. President Donald Trump pulled out of a deal last year between Iran and global powers that aimed to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief.

Iran has repeatedly warned it would block the Strait of Hormuz if it cannot sell its oil because of U.S. sanctions.

Tensions have increased further since Trump acted at the beginning of May to force Iran's oil customers to slash their imports to zero or face draconian U.S. financial sanctions. Iran's oil exports have dropped to around 400,000 barrels per day in May from 2.5 million bpd in April last year.

Also in May, the Trump administration said it would send more troops to the Middle East, citing what it saw as a threat of potential attack by Iran.

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif described the tanker explosions as "suspicious" https://www.reuters.com/article/mideast-tanker-iran-zarif/irans-zarif-calls-oil-tanker-incidents-suspicious-wants-regional-talks-idUSD5N20801L on Twitter and called for regional dialogue. In a later Twitter post, Zarif described the U.S. allegations against Iran as part of "sabotage diplomacy." https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-tankers-zarif/iran-foreign-minister-u-s-allegations-over-tanker-attacks-part-of-sabotage-diplomacy-idUSKCN1TF04S

Tehran has denied responsibility for the May 12 attacks.

The crews of both ships struck on Thursday were picked up safely. The Bahrain-based U.S. Navy Fifth Fleet said it had assisted the two tankers after receiving distress calls.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a meeting of the Security Council on cooperation between the United Nations and the League of Arab States that the world could not afford "a major confrontation in the Gulf region".

The Security Council discussed the attacks behind closed doors on Thursday at the request of the United States.

Kuwait’s U.N. ambassador, Mansour Al-Otaibi, president of the council for June, said after the meeting that all 15 council members had condemned the attacks.

When asked if the United States had shown any evidence to support its accusation that Iran was responsible, Al-Otaibi told reporters: "We didn’t discuss any evidence."

IRAN, U.S. SAY WAR SHOULD BE AVOIDED

Both Iran and the United States have said they want to avoid war.

"Iran will never initiate a war but will give a crushing response to any aggression," Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said on Wednesday.

U.S. Central Command said in a statement on Thursday evening that "we have no interest in engaging in a new conflict in the Middle East. We will defend our interests, but a war with Iran is not in our strategic interest, nor in the best interest of the international community."

Pompeo said U.S. policy remained making economic and diplomatic efforts to bring Iran back to negotiations on a broader deal.

The Iranian U.N. mission's statement said: "It is ironic that the U.S. who unlawfully withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action now calls Iran to come back to negotiations and diplomacy," using the formal name of the 2015 nuclear accord.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In abandoning the deal, Trump made clear he wanted Iran to curb not merely its nuclear work but its development of missiles and support for proxy forces in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.

Some regional analysts said they thought the attacks were likely to have been carried out by Iran and described them as a way for Tehran to try to acquire negotiating leverage and perhaps increase global pressure for U.S.-Iran talks.

"There is always the possibility that somebody is trying to blame the Iranians," said Jon Alterman of Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"But there is the greater likelihood that this represents an effort to bolster Iranian diplomacy by creating a perceived international urgency to have the United States and Iran talk," Alterman said.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was visiting Tehran when Thursday's attacks occurred, carrying a message for Iran from Trump. Abe, whose country was a big importer of Iranian oil until Trump ratcheted up sanctions, urged all sides not to let tensions increase.

Iran said it would not respond to Trump's overture, the substance of which was not made public.

Latest comments

Blame game is on!
I agree they won't be bullied. That is why they need to be taken out. Not everyone in that region is irrational. Just some.
"The Houthis also claimed an armed drone strike last month on Saudi oil pumping stations." Now the question you need to ask is this: Where did the Houthis get an armed drone capable of such a stealth attack? You may recall, Iran stole US armed stealth drone tech a few years back, when they managed to hijack its controls and land one in Iran. They advertised this fact, showed it to the world, and then claimed they would reverse engineer it. The US acknowledged losing the very expensive drone and then the news went silent with embarrassment. Sure, it's possible this could be a false flag attack. But you don't have to be a genius to see who is trying very hard to send a clear message here. This is the warning shots across the bow of the ships. Only here, they are quite happy to strike and use plausible denial. Coupled with a strategy of terror mastered by Iran since the '70s; and then, exported all over the world ever since. Iran will not be contained or bullied.
This is what you call a ploy to delay. Will it work? They have worked it a lot over the years.
The middle east did this a lot in the 70's and 80's to get prices up at different times.
Once the Permian basin pipeline starts flowing US oil stockpiles will grow at a faster pace.
crude can go any direction bc of Iran dispute.
Oil analysts were saying this morning that it shouldn't be very long until oil is back at $50.
Any future tanker attacks can be offset with US production. And the Russians are always talking about market share.
Saudis get high prices and Trump gets a reason to defame Iran.
Iran will try to use Trump to get prices higher. Iran is more worried about prices for the Brotherhood than anything else. Without high oil prices the middle east has nothing.
Really?  They don't have the right to exist like Israel?  Who made you god?
According to Bloomberg neither ship had oil.
if oil tanker didn't had oil, than what oil tanker had in their ship?
Conspiracy theorists? You must not have been around through the 70's and 80's.
Wow! I had no idea that so many online readers were conspiracy theorists!
Conspiracy yes.  Theory no.  Remember Iraq's WMD?  Was that conspiracy theory? or Gulf of Tonkin?  Was that conspiracy theory?  Please do your research on other than sympathetic western media and double talk.
"Suspected attack". Didn't they pull this with a fake drone attack a month or so ago ?
Time to open the National oil reserve. Price needs to be at least $40. Then we can play with the Russians.
absurd
Wag the Dog. Trump's personal aide Hope Hicks will appear before the House Judiciary Committee next Wednesday. Bob Barr and Wilbur Ross were just fount to be in Contempt of Congress. Michael Flynn and Richard Gates are also subpoenaed to appear before House Intelligence Committee. To top it off, cadet Bone Spurs admitted yesterday to being eager to accept oppo research from foreign governments in the 2020 election. Everyone with a lick of sense knows that that is impeachable in its own right. Trump and his RICO family will be exposed to be serial money launderers AND they will create or perform ANY distraction to keep their death grip on Executive Power.
Saudis driving oil price up. lets see what Trump says to that
 Where you there Lion King?  You saw it yourself?
Likely an orchestration by the Saudis to prop up the price
Agreed. Notice when all this started a few weeks ago the first thing that happened was the reinstatement of the Saudi arms deal that congress blocked. Saudi's want their arms and Trump wants to be vindicated on reneging on Iran nuclear deal.
 Iran can break even at much lower prices than Saudis.  Saudis need higher oil to break even and cannot affect massive cuts without rest of OPEC members and Russia.  If not, they simply lose market share.  What do you know about oil?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.