Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
New Year’s SALE: Up to 40% OFF InvestingPro+ CLAIM OFFER

Oil price collapse: Saudis, Russians rush to market’s rescue, 2 weeks early

Commodities Nov 21, 2022 03:34PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters
 
LCO
0.00%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
CL
-2.01%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
2222
+0.30%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Barani Krishnan

Investing.com -- There are another two weeks to go for the OPEC+ meeting, but the Saudis and Russians have decided not to sit back and let the market collapse continue. 

In an urgent response to a Wall Street Journal story on Monday, Saudi Energy Minister Abdulaziz bin Salman denied that the 23-nation oil producing alliance under his charge was working on a production hike of 500,000 barrels per day to announce at OPEC+’s Dec. 4 meeting. 

If the WSJ report had been true, it would have been a pivot to the 2-million-barrel per day cut that OPEC+ had announced for November. It would have been a hike small in barrels, yet huge in goodwill, doing wonders for Saudi-U.S. relations but, unfortunately, further hammering already free-falling crude prices.

Both New York-traded West Texas Intermediate crude, or WTI, the benchmark for U.S. crude, and London's Brent, the global gauge for oil, hit their lowest since the beginning of the year in Monday’s early trading, partly based on the WSJ story.   

But the report wasn’t true, Saudi energy minister Abdulaziz said in a statement issued by state news agency SPA. 

“It is well-known that OPEC+ does not discuss any decisions ahead of the meeting," Abdulaziz said, referring to the Dec. 4 meeting. 

He added: “The current cut of 2M barrels per day by OPEC+ continues until the end of 2023 and if there is a need to take further measures by reducing production to balance supply and demand we always remain ready to intervene.”

And just like on cue, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak, Abdulaziz’s closest non-Gulf ally in OPEC+, came in with his own responses to the upcoming Dec. 5 decision by Western nations on a prospective import ban and price cap on Russian oil.

Novak reiterated Russia’s stand of not selling its oil to nations that would participate in the price-cap, a plan devised by the West to limit the funding that Moscow could put in its war against Ukraine. The Russian deputy premier also said something else that helped crude prices go back into the positive for the day: in the event of an oil price cap, Russia may also reduce oil production.

“Lower supply will be the result from a price cap on Russian oil,” Novak added.

WTI, which hit a session low of $75.30 on Monday, marking a bottom since January, recovered most of their losses by midday, responding to the remarks by Abdulaziz and Novak. The U.S. crude benchmark settled at $79.73 a barrel, down 35 cents, 0.4%.

Sunil Kumar Dixit, chief technical strategist at SKCharting.com, said oversold conditions could push WTI back towards the 100-week Simple Moving Average of $81.30. “But it has to get to and close above $80. Otherwise, there’s always the danger if it moving towards lows of $72.50 and $71.”

Global crude benchmark Brent sank to $82.36 earlier, its lowest since February, before recovering to settle at $87.45, down 17 cents, or 0.2%, on the day.

“It’s interesting the coordinated response we’ve got from the Saudis and the Russians in denying the WSJ report and putting a floor under the oil selloff,” said John Kilduff, founding partner at New York energy hedge fund Again Capital. “There’s another two weeks to the OPEC+ meeting and they’ve decided there's too much at risk on the price front if they keep mum till then.”

Crude prices also entered briefly on Friday into a “contango” mode — a market structure that defines weakness — for the first time since 2021. Under this dynamic, the front-month oil contract in the futures market trades at a discount to the nearby month. While the difference itself might be small, it forces buyers wishing to hold a position in oil at the time of contract expiry to pay more to switch to a new front-month contract.

With such negativity in crude now, all eyes are on what the OPEC+ alliance of oil producers will do when it meets on Dec. 4.

OPEC+ — the alliance that bands OPEC, or the 13-member Saudi-led Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, with 10 other oil producers steered by Russia — agreed at its prior meeting to slash production by 2M barrels per day in order to boost Brent and U.S. crude prices that had fallen sharply from March highs.

Right after that OPEC+ decision, Brent went from a low of around $82 a barrel to almost $100 within days (it had hit almost $140 earlier in March). WTI rose from $76 to $96 (WTI was at just over $130 in March). Both benchmarks have lost all those gains in the past two weeks, raising questions on whether OPEC+ will go for even more cuts to prop the market up again.

Abdulaziz’s remarks on Monday signaled the likelihood of further cuts, especially when he said the alliance will be “ready to intervene” if there’s a need to “take further measures by reducing production to balance supply and demand”.

OPEC+’s 2M-barrel cut itself has not sat well with the United States. 

Saudi-U.S. relations have hit a low point over oil-production disagreements this year, though WSJ reported on Monday that U.S. officials had been looking to the Dec. 4 OPEC+ meeting with some hope.

Talk of a production increase emerged after the Biden administration told a federal court judge that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman should have sovereign immunity from a U.S. federal lawsuit related to the brutal killing of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The immunity decision amounted to a concession to Mohammed, bolstering his standing as the kingdom’s de facto ruler after the Biden administration tried for months to isolate him. 

The WSJ acknowledged in its report that it would be an unusual time for OPEC+ to consider a production increase, with global oil prices falling more than 10% since the first week of November itself on a rash of Covid headlines out of China. 

Rising coronavirus cases in China invited new lockdown measures in some of the country’s biggest cities, drumming up concerns over slowing crude demand in the world’s largest oil importer. The country is currently struggling with its worst COVID outbreak since April, which had seen several cities placed under lockdown. A report earlier this month said that several Chinese refiners asked Saudi Aramco (TADAWUL:2222) to supply lower amounts of oil in December, which could point to slowing oil shipments to the country. China has also ramped up its refined fuel export quotas, potentially indicating a surplus in crude stockpiles due to waning demand.

Even so, some delegates to the OPEC+ apparently told WSJ that a production increase could take place in December in response to expectations that oil consumption typically rises in the winter. Oil demand is expected to increase by 1.69M barrels a day to 101.3M barrels a day by the first quarter next year, compared with the average level in 2022. 

Saudi energy minister Abdulaziz has also said in the past the kingdom would supply oil to ‘all who need it.’

Oil price collapse: Saudis, Russians rush to market’s rescue, 2 weeks early
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (20)
nawaf alsaud
nawaf alsaud Jan 08, 2023 6:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I hope they try to but cap on saudi oil price and see the results I don’t think it well be pleasant it well only back fire and at the end the Saudi we’ll come out winning
simon meso
simon meso Jan 05, 2023 3:47PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
what is a point here. if they wish a collapse of global economy they may cut production as well even mmore. i doubt that is goal rather to play the game thet they are guys in controll.
syedarshadullah hussaini
syedarshadullah hussaini Dec 03, 2022 3:38AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
saudi arabia downfall started,price caps will erode saudi economy slowly and steadily.
dim dim
dim dim Nov 29, 2022 5:40PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
ceiling price on oil prices,   those who thought of this are so stupid??? they put a price ceiling on someone else's merchandise that they themselves don't have??? i.e. now we should expect an oil price somewhere around 250 dollars/barrel.!!! they are so stupid and out of touch with the market and international trade,   let them pay to learn.!!!
simon meso
simon meso Nov 29, 2022 5:40PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
you dont get it at all. global economies are interconnected, saudi arabia also buys products elsewhere. cap on russian oil is deemed to cut russian revenues. Europe is holding a bag so dont worry. we have no problem with it.
Karsten Vester
Karsten Vester Nov 29, 2022 6:19AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
All this info could very well be pure manipulation and I’m fed up with these experts tellung their story. Rarely true. Woyld be so easy to have a friend investing in relation to what all these “experts” say. Rigged system
Jay Garrelts
Jay Garrelts Nov 22, 2022 1:33PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Its ok folks don’t worry the prince said peasants shouldn’t worry about things he’s got the top brass on it got back to playing with your credit score and your mediocre wealth and your imaginary computer money thinking you got something lol
Kerry Ditto
Kerry Ditto Nov 22, 2022 8:05AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
TSLA's p/e is 50+. a ridiculous joke.
James Kelley
James Kelley Nov 22, 2022 4:29AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Is this app just flooded with “fake news” “sheep” bots? Wow. These comments are veey broad and explain nothing. If yourngoing to vry wolf at keast explain the parts you disagree with.
WTIComedy Central
WTIComedy Central Nov 22, 2022 4:29AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
WSJournal should ask Opec leaders first, before they printed some Bull....ts ? Professionals
Jim Hernandez
Jim Hernandez Nov 21, 2022 7:10PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Verified fake news media prints story. Fake news sheep believe so called fake story causing down market. OPEC said this was fake news. Sheep get angry at fake news media. Markets back up again. Sheep anxiously waiting for the next fake news to follow again. If you can't see how ridiculously funny this is, then you need to open your eyes and wake up. This is a market for day traders with their finger on the sell button. Get your profits and get out and you won't have to worry about what the fake news says. Sleep sheep sleep...
Jim Morrison
Jim Morrison Nov 21, 2022 5:52PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I don't know what is worse the articles that are obviously narrative based or the future trader who believes it. Good news is Brandon pardoned two turkeys today. Both had jobs at WSJ.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email