Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Reveal Undervalued Stocks Hiding in Any Market Get Started

OPEC tells EU it's not possible to replace potential Russian oil supply loss

Commodities Apr 11, 2022 04:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The OPEC logo pictured ahead of an informal meeting between members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in Algiers, Algeria, September 28, 2016. REUTERS/Ramzi Boudina

By Kate Abnett and Alex Lawler

BRUSSELS/LONDON (Reuters) -OPEC told the European Union on Monday that current and future sanctions on Russia could create one of the worst ever oil supply shocks and it would be impossible to replace those volumes, and signalled it would not pump more.

European Union officials held talks in Vienna with representatives of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries amid calls for the group to increase output and as the EU considers potential sanctions on Russian oil.

"We could potentially see the loss of more than 7 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian oil and other liquids exports, resulting from current and future sanctions or other voluntary actions," OPEC Secretary General Mohammad Barkindo said, according to a copy of his speech seen by Reuters.

"Considering the current demand outlook, it would be nearly impossible to replace a loss in volumes of this magnitude."

The European Union reiterated its call in the meeting for oil-producing countries to look at whether they can increase deliveries to help cool soaring oil prices, a European Commission official told Reuters.

EU representatives also pointed out that OPEC has a responsibility to ensure balanced oil markets, the official said.

OPEC has resisted calls by the United States and the International Energy Agency to pump more crude to cool prices, which reached a 14-year peak last month after Washington and Brussels imposed sanctions on Moscow following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

In the meeting with OPEC, the EU said OPEC could provide more production from its spare capacity, according to an OPEC document seen by Reuters.

Still, Barkindo said the current highly volatile market was a result of "non-fundamental factors" outside OPEC's control, in a signal the group would not pump more.

OPEC+, which consists of OPEC and other producers including Russia, will raise output by about 432,000 barrels per day in May, as part of a gradual unwinding of output cuts made during the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The EU-OPEC meeting on Monday afternoon was the latest in a dialogue launched between the two sides in 2005.

Russian oil has been excluded from EU sanctions so far. But after the 27-country bloc agreed last week to sanction Russian coal - its first to target energy supplies - some senior EU officials said oil could be next.

The European Commission is drafting proposals for an oil embargo on Russia, the foreign ministers of Ireland, Lithuania and the Netherlands said on Monday at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg, although there was no agreement to ban Russian crude.

Australia, Canada and the United States, who are less reliant on Russian supply than Europe, have already banned Russian oil purchases.

EU countries are split over whether to follow suit, given their higher dependency and the potential for the move to push up already high energy prices in Europe.

The EU expects its oil use to decrease 30% by 2030, from 2015 levels, under its planned policies to fight climate change - though in the short term, an embargo would trigger a dash to replace Russian oil with alternative supplies.

OPEC tells EU it's not possible to replace potential Russian oil supply loss
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (9)
Maximus Maximus
Maximus Maximus Apr 11, 2022 10:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Of course its possible. Seal deals with iran and venezuela now + throw the oil lobby out on the street where they belong and intensify the shift to renewables
Small Trader
Small Trader Apr 11, 2022 5:07PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Apparently OPEC is quite happy with the price and since Russia is in OPEC+ they aren't even willing to tap into their spare capacity to even help at all. Good thing Biden declared war on domestic prooduction on his first day. Time for all the climate activists to rejoice as people suffer and ****hot air about renewables meeting the need.
Ken Roth
Ken Roth Apr 11, 2022 3:05PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Renewal energy here we go….also why not let the iranians export all the oil they want
Klaus Mittwoch
Klaus Mittwoch Apr 11, 2022 2:03PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Oil supply shocks is very good for everyone who don't understand that we have give up oil as soon as possible. I hope that will speed up whole process.
Mart Bab
Rubberduck1973 Apr 11, 2022 2:01PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
My bet is on renewables now. Finally the eu will seriously have to work on its green agenda. Instead of dragging. Nuclear, solar, wind. Everything but dependency on other states. Massively buying green energy stock in eu.
Alan Rice
Alan Rice Apr 11, 2022 1:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Waste ......Want.
Paul Dunne
Paul Dunne Apr 11, 2022 1:27PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The utter dependence on oil shows that "green" and "alternative energy sources", as of 2022, are total nonsense.
Todd Gray
Todd Gray Apr 11, 2022 12:40PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The western governments are ridiculously presuming, ready fire aim types. But, they think their so important in that state, regardless.
jason xx
jason xx Apr 11, 2022 12:40PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Traitor s c u m you don't deserve freedom chump
John Eisenbeiser
John Eisenbeiser Apr 11, 2022 7:26AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
OPEC to EU. We are happy to peoduce more oil. So long as you use nore oil in 2030!
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email