Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
🙌 It's Here: the Only Stock Screener You'll Ever Need Get Started

The Energy Report: She Said He Said

By Phil FlynnCommoditiesMar 23, 2023 08:55AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/the-energy-report-she-said-he-said-200636551
The Energy Report: She Said He Said
By Phil Flynn   |  Mar 23, 2023 08:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
ICE
+2.10%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
LCO
-0.63%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
CL
-0.63%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
NG
+0.09%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

Fed chairman Jerome Powell seemed to give confidence to the markets in his post-Fed rate hike press conference. Still, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen at the same time, speaking about Biden’s budget, seemed to take some of that confidence away. Both speaking at the same time seemed to bolster confidence, but some of the ill-advised phrasings of answers by Janet Yellen seemed to offset a more balanced tone from the Fed Chairman.

Oil prices are also looking for confidence as the banking crisis of confidence as we already alluded to, saw one of the biggest oil and petroleum futures and option liquidations in history. Yet if the market becomes convinced that this banking crisis is under control, will money flow back to petroleum, where all the data points to wildly bullish fundamentals.

The Fed’s statement yesterday said that the US banking system is sound and resilient. They also acknowledge that recent developments are likely to result in tighter credit conditions for households and businesses and could weigh on economic activity, hiring, and inflation. The extent of these effects are uncertain. They wanted to assure the markets that they remain highly attentive to the inflation risks.

Jerome Powell also said that he did not expect that the Federal Reserve would cut rates later in the year. The Fed fund futures sees it a different way. They are pricing in increasing odds of a rate cut later in the year.

Yet market optimism seemed to be zapped when Janet Yellen said quite indelicately said that, “the failure of a small community bank could trigger bank runs as much as a larger bank failure.” while that is true it was not exactly the type of statement that inspires confidence in a market that already has had its confidence shaken. Treasury Secretary Yellen also said that, “we are not considering ensuring all uninsured bank deposits”. That was a proposal that was floated earlier and seemed to alleviate fears that if you had your money in a regional bank that you should probably move it. Yet even considering the possibility that their deposits were safe, really provided the confidence that helped to stop another run on the banks. So, I guess I would have answered that question slightly differently. I would have said that they were still studying it even if the odds of a full-blown run of all bank deposits was unlikely.

At the end of the day, Silicon Valley Bank had all their depositors covered. I would have at least left open the possibility that the treasury and the banking authorities could once again, in the event of emergency, back all uninsured depositors. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not looking for the government to back all uninsured depositors. Yet I do think that when you help create a crisis by trying to micromanage the markets with too much talk and too little action on inflation, or at least delayed action on inflation, then you must be a lot more careful the way that you present your plans to fix what you have had a big part in breaking.

The crisis of confidence has not hit global oil demand yet. In fact, quite the opposite. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), US petroleum exports surged to a whopping 12 million barrels a day, a near-record high as the world is sucking down fossil fuels like crazy.

This is out of touch with the massive petroleum liquidation. John Kemp at Reuters pointed out that, “Portfolio investors dumped petroleum futures and options at one of the fastest rates on record in the early stages of the banking crisis.” Reuters showed that hedge funds and other money managers sold the equivalent of 139 million barrels in the six most important futures and options contracts over the seven days ending March 14. The volume of sales was the 12th largest in the 522 weeks since ICE (NYSE:ICE) Futures Europe and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission started to publish records in this form in 2013.

Fund managers have sold a total of 148 million barrels since the end of January, taking their combined position to 432 million barrels (20th percentile for all weeks since 2013).In the most recent week, there were heavy sales of Brent (-65 million barrels), NYMEX and ICE WTI (-59 million), U.S. gasoline (-12 million) and European gas oil (-7 million), with only minor buying of U.S. diesel (+4 million).

Now add to that data from the EIA that shows not only robust demand but extremely tight supply.

The EIA reported a 1.1 million barrel increase in crude supply, but a million-barrel drop in Cushing, Oklahoma. The EIA says that supply is 8% above average but that ignores the record drop in Strategic Petroleum Reserve Supply.

Yet a massive drop in products should cause some concern as the EIA showed that motor gasoline inventories decreased by 6.4 million barrels from last week and are about 4% below the five year average for this time of year. And distillate fuel inventories down by 3.3 million barrels last week and are about 9% below the five-year average for this time of year. Weekly demand for gasoline and diesel increased and total petroleum demand hit 20.26 million barrels a day.

What is clear is that demand destruction for petroleum products around the globe have not been adversely impacted by interest rate increases so far. Any demand weakness that we’ve seen because of higher rates seems to be offset by the reopening of China and the fact that Europe must be very aggressive in securing supply because of the risks that they face.

Even though petroleum traders dumped futures because of uncertainty surrounding the banking crisis, they may have to buy them back especially because global central banks are going to be a little bit more dovish than they were before. We would fully expect that at some point oil prices are going to have to come back because the wholesale dumping of oil positions were based more on fear than reality.

OPEC is not getting shaken by the recent sell off. They said that they are likely to keep on course with their 2 million barrel a day production cut until the end of 2023 despite the price drop that would suggest that OPEC has a lot of confidence that that demand is going to hold up. In fact everywhere you look when it comes to OPEC pricing, it appears that demand is continuing to be strong for OPEC supply.

Today we get the natural gas report. My expectation is that we will see a sizable 76 BCF withdrawal from supply. There were a lot of people who wanted to be long natural gas for the long haul, and I don’t blame them but it’s just a very difficult trade in the short term. I think natural gas futures are going to be a bit rangebound with an upward bias later in the year.

The Energy Report: She Said He Said
 

Related Articles

The Energy Report: She Said He Said

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
EL LA
EL LA Mar 23, 2023 12:36PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Meanwhile, a sound bank in Texas lending to oil and gas questions why it is paying more to support the unsound banks of Silicon Valley? Unlike the hypothetical Texas oil and gas company, Silicon Valley venture capitalists who banked at SVB were able to offset their risk management onto the banking system.  This seems like a transfer of wealth from the oil and gas sector to the tech sector.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email