Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Gold And Basel III: What To Consider

By Andrew LaneCommoditiesMar 04, 2021 07:28AM ET
Gold And Basel III: What To Consider
By Andrew Lane   |  Mar 04, 2021 07:28AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) is owned by 63 central banks around the world and accounts for approximately 95% of world GDP. Its headquarters are in Basel, Switzerland, and it works in the area of monetary and financial stability. Buried amongst the broad layers of information on Basel III lies a key part in the upcoming reforms—The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR).

BIS has defined this change as the amount of available stable funding relative to the amount of required stable funding. Pretty straight forward to work out. This however is a key aspect of the Basel III reform and as previously mentioned eliminates the reckless lending that caused the crisis in 2008 onwards.
What we have to understand though is this change is new territory for banks, and will lead to some of the smaller sized having to close their doors for good. Pre 2008, you could walk into a bank or building society and after giving your name and shoe size you could leave with a 125% mortgage. As crazy as it sounds that is what is was like. Such was the faith in the house price boom, banks saw this as such little risk thinking their investment could easily be swallowed up with the ludicrous incremental house price increases we were seeing at the time. This lending criteria was not just “loose” against mortgages lets not forget, as there are many other types of financing banks offer.
So the NSFR is the critical element we must look at when assessing how the Basel III rules will affect banks. With fiat depreciating faster than a dropped rock over time, what other option do banks have to lend against? Well it is no secret that banks have been buying gold for the last few years, and it is also no secret that the D-Day date of Basel III has been delayed over the years with Covid the latest excuse.

Now the cynic in me says it’s purely been another gift opportunity to smash down the price of paper gold while buying cheap and loading the vault floors up. However this June 28 date is fast approaching and for every day that elapses, it becomes more difficult for it to be put back again. There has been an extension granted for the LBMA but critically this doesn’t affect the global view on NSFR
So physical gold (not paper) reclassified as Tier 1 should drive a physical market. No longer can paper gold be shorted as we have seen over the years of manipulation. So what are the ways around it I hear you ask. There is no way the banks will accept it, and must already have a plan up their sleeve to bend the rules. But what if they don’t need to? What if these new Basel III rules work in their favour, and instead of the price smashing over the years, it becomes in their interests for the price of gold to go higher?

At current levels, around $1720 buys you an ounce of gold. If you have several tonnes of it sitting in your vaults that is allocated and you can lend against this then surely it would be in the interests of the banks for the prices to explode higher. Manipulated inflation/price fixing if you will.
To put into perspective just how important the NSFR is to understand, more gold is traded daily in London than is produced through mining in a year. Just consider that. It is estimated that nearly 95% of that gold traded daily in London is unallocated paper gold. Similar figures exist in the COMEX in New York, and around 1% ever insisting on delivery. We can easily deduce from these figures a rough percentage of how many are unallocated naked shorts, and it’s a big figure.    
So how is the gold allocation going to be proven? Well simply put banks are going to get audited prior to the deadline, therefore If physical is required before the audit, banks have to insist on delivery and quickly. So where is all this gold going to come from when we know a huge amount traded is paper? The exchanges have been settling premiums at futures delivery dates for years when demand gets too much. And the allocations being demanded will far exceed the logistical ability to deliver. So what then happens? The COMEX, LBMA and others collapse? What about the naked short positions? They have to be closed before the audit, otherwise it would be like a murderer handing himself into the police with the gun in his hand and the bullets missing. So why would any bank currently with physical gold in their possession want to sell any of it, particularly at the current price level? Well they wouldn’t would they?
So why is there no reflection of this in the current price of gold is the next question. Well unequivocally there is I would argue. Why else could gold be sitting at this level? (and could dip a little further in the short term) Almost every other commodity—even oil that went to minus numbers in March is sitting above their pre Covid levels.

Some have far exceeded that level as well. Take silver—arguably the most manipulated metal of them all and it is nearly 50% up on pre-Covid levels. The answer is the paper naked shorts need to unwind and we are dangerously close to that timeframe. I suspect a bottom somewhere near the 1700 level will be formed and when the shorts cannot push any further as time is against them, we will see an upside rise fairly quickly. Let’s explore this upcoming scenario.
Say you are a big commercial bank that wants delivery of huge physical Gold in the April delivery month. If the COMEX was to turn around and offer a cash settlement as has been the case for years, the big commercial bank may refuse. After all if it isn’t available, it shouldn’t have been offered. What this could lead to is essentially an “I owe you” from the COMEX to the bank or a further rollover into next month.

However if 50 big commercial banks come knocking at the door, it will be impossible to satisfy this demand. At this point a force majeure may well be played, nonetheless if you have a shortened deadline and need the physical gold no money settlement would be acceptable, as the price of gold could go up exponentially before January 2023 so cash with premium isn’t attractive.

So what happens next? Legal proceedings against the COMEX perhaps? But would the banks want that when it could expose their naked shorts? Perhaps they wouldn’t care given the previous penalties dished out are worth far less than the proceeds gained from the crime. But they still need their physical. The COMEX will need to source it, and potentially pay way over the odds to get it. Will that cause them to collapse? Potentially. What would happen to the price of gold and silver if the COMEX didn’t exist? It would explode to the upside—it’s a moment every precious metal investor has been longing for as it would create a stable and fair price.
How this plays out is anyone’s guess as there are so many scenarios there are no rulebooks to refer to. Putting to one side how messy the next few months could get, the upshot is with paper shorts out of the question from June 28 2021, banks being audited before the end of Q2 2021, and a mass, mass shortage of gold; we can almost ignore the macros at play in the current world as Basel III is a lot bigger and a trade opportunity that cannot be missed. Prices cannot hang around for much longer at these levels, and as we head towards the end of Q1 we would expect prices to begin their ascent to much higher levels.
In part 3 of this research article we will explore the impact on the dollar, the rumoured global reset and how markets will react.       

Gold And Basel III: What To Consider

Related Articles

Gold And Basel III: What To Consider

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (6)
Jay Schurman
Jay Schurman Mar 07, 2021 5:27AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Why won’t the Banksters just roll the date forward to escape this scenario?   Why not roll the date to June 28, 2024 and ease the banks pain?
Guy Mishani
Guy Mishani Mar 06, 2021 10:39AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
“However, secured funding and lending transactions where the collateral is in the form of gold or other commodities would not meet the definition of a secured funding transaction or secured lending transaction.“ from US gov website . Your thoughts ??
nuno borges
nuno borges Mar 05, 2021 3:24PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Hey Andrew, what's your twitter handle? This alpha needs to reach a wider audience starved for quality analysis.
Charles de Vilmorin
Charles de Vilmorin Mar 05, 2021 6:41AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thank you for this article. Hardly anyone is talking about NSFR. Silence or denial about it is what the bullion banks will want.
murat soycengiz
murat soycengiz Mar 05, 2021 5:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thank you,nobody talk this naked shorts.
JP JATTAN Mar 04, 2021 9:06AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Thanks for this quality report.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email