Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

FANGMAN Elliott Wave Review – Part 3: Amazon

Published 06/26/2020, 04:22 PM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Two days ago I started this mini-series of reviewing the seven most important stocks of the current market using Elliott Wave Theory: Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA). Why? Because the first six names, excluding Netflix, make up about 20% of the S&P 500 and a whopping 40% of the NASDAQ Composite Index. And they’re all trading at or close to all-time highs (ATHs). I started with Apple, and yesterday, I reported on Microsoft.

The next one down on the market-cap totem pole is Amazon at $1.370 trillion. The largest online retailer and cloud software provider in the world. In this update, I wanted to compare its long-term price chart to
that of two other big household name stocks. Both have lost significant value recently, and have strikingly similar price patterns going into their blow-off phase: Boeing (NYSE:BA) and Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS).

Amazon started trading in 1997, and like almost all tech stocks that were around back then, it peaked in 2000: blue wave-I. It bottomed in October 2001 at $5.51: blue wave-II. See Figure 1. Since then, it has
almost uninterruptedly rallied into its 2018 high of $2050.50 following a clean EWT impulse pattern (five waves up). A 370% increase (orang parabolic line). Since that high Amazon has been trading sideways
(triangular shaped) until March 23, 2020, low. Within that triangle, I can EWT count a wave-1 (leading diagonal) and a wave-2. Amazon has since that infamous low virtually gone straight up gaining just north of 70% in only three months. If the runup into 2018 wasn’t parabolic enough, then I can’t tell you what the current rally is. As you can see, this month’s price high reached the 1.618x Fibonacci-extension of wave-1, measured from wave-2 almost to the T ($2795 vs. $2801). This “straight-up” and Fib-extension is typical for a 3 rd wave. I, therefore, now expect a wave-4 retrace back to around the 100% extension ($2400 +/- 100) after which it should rally one final time for a wave-5 of V to new ATHs.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

After that? I expect a 90% haircut. Call me crazy, but I will show two recent examples (there are many more) to make my case. But before I do that, please note the negative divergences building on the technical indicators, especially on the Money Flow Index. This mini-series shows, it is a recurring theme, most often foretelling of worse things to come.

The monthly chart of Boeing shows a parabolic move from its 2016 low into its 2018 high. See figure 2. Similar to Amazon’s rise. It then traded sideways for almost a year, rallied for two months straight up, and
the rest is now history. Contrary to the technology stocks reviewed here, Boeing took a nosedive and lost 80% of its share price by late-March of this year. Note the negative divergences on the technical indicators (red arrows): less momentum and less money going into the stock during those last few months—the same as what is happening for Amazon now.

Figure 2.

Another stock that went parabolic, then temporarily sideways in a triangular fashion, followed by a blow-off top and significant drop is Disney. See Figure 3 below. The stock has been around for much longer
than most tech stocks, as it started trading publicly in 1946. Its long-term EWT count is, therefore, slightly different. But what matters is the similarities in price pattern and technical indicator setup between charts. Disney went parabolic from 2009 into 2015: an almost 900% gain. It went sideways, in a triangle, for nearly three years, which I count as a (blue) Primary-IV wave. 4 th waves are often triangles.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

From the April 2018 low, I can then count five (black) waves up into the November 2019 high. The 3 rd wave subdivided nicely into five smaller waves (red i, ii, iii, iv, v). Disney followed a picture-perfect EWT
impulse pattern. Once the impulse completed at $152.50, Disney went on to lose 48% come end-of-March 2020. No surprise either since the technical indicators were, once again, diverging: higher prices on less momentum and less money flowing into the stock. Disney has since the March low rebounded (which stock hasn’t?), but it is in a three-wave fashion: corrective. I, therefore, expect more downside shortly.

Figure 3.

The purple dotted arrows are the path I projected in January 2020 for Disney. What the market did came close. This pattern recognition is the predictive power of Elliott Wave. But, bringing this back to the
current Amazon chart, and I find striking similarities with Boeing and Disney before their bubble burst:

– Parabolic runup, equivalent to a 3 rd wave

– Many months of sideways price action, often in the form of a triangle, aka consolidation. Equivalent to a 4 th wave.

– A break out from the consolidation level. This rally lasts several months: around 2 to 24—the final 5 th wave.

– The breakout is on slowing momentum and less money flow.

The result of this pattern is always the same: lots of pain. For now, it appears Amazon is where Disney was either April or July 2019. Maximum upside potential for Disney was then 5-15%, and downside risk well over 40%. These are repeating universal patterns that most, if not all, stocks will succumb to eventually.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Need more proof?

Take a look at, for example, Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F), Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) and General Electric Company (NYSE:GE). Please tell me how each did after there parabolic phase. Has any traded above their ATHs, or are they treading water with no net gains over several decades?

Using Elliott wave, similarities in price patterns, and comparing technical indicator setups, I find Amazon is likely closer to a significant top than to a bottom. From other stock examples, it is evident once stocks
have gone parabolic, their long-term performance is less than stellar. Each share will trade differently after the blow-off top, but haircuts of 90% are more likely than not.

Latest comments

Thanks for your insights. A question comes to mind is that what will happen to a stock after completing five waves? For example, boeing or disney
Thank you very much for the insights.I am pretty new to EWP as I have just studied this theory for less than two weeks. Anyway, I have tried my heart out and dedicated at least 10 to 15 hours a day studying the theory. I believe I know almost rules, guidelines and patterns now and started analizing real charts. I found EWP reliable in bigger time frames like week or month. But I am a trader who entry and exit within 3-7 days so I will mainly rely on 1 hour timeframe and sometime find it hard to identify subdivision waves so some time I am not sure if the wave count is 100% correct. The question is how much 1 hour timeframe reliable compared to bigger ones and should I worry too much about subdivision waves?
Hi Paul, EWT works on all time frames, but it will get harder and harder the shorter-time frame you go as there will be more and more options because it will be harder and harder to define a wave. Stick to one-hour charts max. Trying to micro-count the 5 min chart always leads to mistakes. Always work from an a/1, b/2, c/3 perspective because you don't know at first if it will be an a,b,c, or a 1,2,3,4,5. then price levels will tell u which it ultimately is. you will also need to bigger time frames to know in which parameters you are working
Hi Dr. Arnout, Thank you very much for your kind reply and guidance. It really helps boost my confidence in trading using EWT.
Wonderful explanation, thank you. I understand EWT and realize that it’s not reliably predictive in the short term. But it does seem a bit odd to compare a cash-rich stock like AMZN with cutting edge tech in multiple diversified businesses (incl $4B current qtr investment in anti-Covid measures, kinda timely given C’s persistence) to BA which has failed due to a one-off major engineering snafu (737 Max) and heavy debt burden and to DIS which has nearly all its eggs in one basket (crowds, sports) during a pandemic which has shut down almost all of its operations. Given that almost no one can compete with AMZN and it’s spending on new businesses and tech, barring a regulatory issue (AT&T type mandated split?) I’m not sure what one “incident”, or even chain of them, would cause AMZN to drop 90%. Guess every stock has a black swan, tho, but if I could picture it, by definition it wouldn’t be a black swan.
thank you! However, many are confusing fundamentals with price charts. why did all the other companies exhibit the same price pattern? All were and are still very solid companies. Somehow we can all agree it is 5 waves up, then 3 waves down, etc within say even a larger five waves up, for all these companies, and nobody ever brings forth any fundamentals to proof or disproof that is or was correct. but when it then comes to saying the sequence has ended, all of a sudden a 1001 arguments are made on why it can't be true and why the party must continue. this is why stocks top and why most will get caught on the wrong side. that is the essence of Elliot wave: it tracks human sentiment. it makes no difference for what stock or index. it is all driven by the exact same emotions.
wow so well put! I am reading your articles now and you are so spot on. It plays into the multile they have now and their real value as a company. Plus discount the multiple value in a recession and or depression and you actually can conclude amzons value as a company would be 10-15x earnings. Which can easily get earn them a 90% cut. End of story.
More upgrades on tech stocks happening next week. Buying FANG until cure/vaccine pop. Doctor, feel free to keep buying those old timer BMY type stocks for the coming dividend cut & no growth.
My wife works at BMY. They are integrating Celgene, hiring like crazy and working on a cure for various cancers. Definitely not expecting a dividend cut. That being said, I don’t own it cuz it’s boring and not high enough growth, plus four year’s worth of dividends can get wiped out in a single day if a drug fails a Phase 3 trial.
Hi I am new to Elliot wave, I actually passed an online course related to the waves. how reliable is it? is it like 70% or 80% reliable?should we also compare the different stocks while they are following relative products and not using the theory for every stocks mix together?for example, to compare DIS with NFLX, or BA with LMT, BBD or AMZN with SHOP, MRCY, EBAY?(btw: I really enjoyed the wave explanation on charts)
Hi Ali, EWT is 100% reliable in hindsight and about 70% beforehand. Why? Because the market always has several options to choose from. For example, will it do an A,B,C higer (5-3-5) or impulse higher (5-3-5-3-5). You will need several other analytical tools to help determine which it most likely will be. The great thing is: you can eliminate options when the market goes above or below certain price levels. The with EWT you can know pretty good what higher or lower price target is next.
It's inevitable. Doesn't matter if it is stocks or crypto... remember BTC bubble?
Hello Doctor. wave and chart show you what you want to see.. sure 90% hair cut can happen if someone can find alternative to cloud and eCommerce but not because of some charts says so. hence please think twice before doing such a bold claim(some people call it nonsense too)
In correct. I showed the facts and objective analysis and comparison. You have the opinions. All the other companies stockcharts I showed, these are great companies. Have grown tremendously over the last 20+ years. But their stocks are down...
Is there no relation of Disney or Boeing nosedive to COVID? Is it just the wave? Ridiculous analysis.
EWT shows the sentiments . it follows the chaos theory.. You need an understanding of the analysis first , then ridicule it as per your perception.
I wonder why you even bother replying to Mr. Nobody Sumit
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.