Equal Weight ETFs: Hidden Upside in Today’s Market

Published 08/25/2025, 12:14 PM

Investors have grown used to looking at the market through a single lens, usually the S&P 500 or the Nasdaq-100 index. But those indices are only benchmarks. And like any benchmark, they need to be measured against others to uncover where the real opportunities lie.

It’s like saying bonds are attractive when they pay 4% in annual yields—until you notice a safe conglomerate paying 6% instead.

That’s the power of benchmarking, and it’s how investors can still find alpha in today’s noisy ETF market.

The SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust (NYSE:SPY) is the go-to for most, but few have noticed how much it has drifted from peers like the iShares Russell 2000 ETF or, more importantly, its close cousin, the Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (NYSE:RSP).

The implications of this divergence could point directly to the next big opportunity.

Today’s Market Is Not Yesterday’s Market

When investors buy the S&P 500 ETF (SPY), the idea is to gain exposure to a broad mix of American businesses across industries. But that isn’t what SPY represents today. For the first time in over a decade, most of its weight is concentrated in just a handful of stocks.

All of these names sit in the red-hot technology sector, with NVIDIA now holding the largest position in the fund. In other words, investors buying SPY are essentially overweight technology—and overweight NVIDIA—even if they don’t realize it.

This concentration has helped SPY outperform. Over the past 12 months, it has beaten the iShares Russell 2000 ETF by more than 10%, as high interest rates and inflation keep smaller companies boxed in. On the other hand, companies like NVIDIA can spend billions on strategic pivots, allowing them to escape those same limits.

Why Choose Equal Weight?

Here’s where things get interesting. The Equal Weight S&P 500 ETF (RSP) gives every company the same weight, providing a more balanced view of the U.S. economy.

No single company or sector can overtake the way NVIDIA has in SPY.

Today, the gap between SPY and RSP has grown to 17.5%—a level not seen since the 2008 financial crisis.

That doesn’t mean another crisis is around the corner, but it does suggest that the gap is unlikely to last. Either RSP outperforms from here, or SPY comes back down to close it.

Going off historical norms, the current 17.5% gap between SPY and RSP suggests that a convergence is due. That could happen in one of two ways: either RSP outperforms and closes the gap, or SPY pulls back sharply enough to meet it. Either way, the setup favors RSP.

On the upside, if RSP simply catches up to SPY, investors stand to gain roughly 17.5%—a move supported by historical precedent. On the downside, if SPY sells off, RSP is positioned to hold up better given how far behind it already is. That creates an attractive risk-to-reward profile for investors.

Looking under the hood of RSP makes the case stronger. No single stock represents more than 0.24% of the portfolio, and any outlier is quickly adjusted through rebalancing. Even the top ten holdings are spread across consumer, financial, and technology sectors, providing a broader snapshot of the U.S. economy.

By contrast, SPY remains heavily tilted toward technology, with an outsized focus on semiconductors and chipmakers. That concentration may look appealing during a tech-driven rally, but it works against diversification and leaves investors more exposed to tail risk.

All told, RSP gives investors a straightforward way to participate if the gap with SPY closes, while also offering more protection on the downside if the market turns against today’s concentrated leaders.

Original Post


Latest comments

excellent technical analysis
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2026 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.