
Please try another search
The bull run in U.S. equities in recent years strikes many investors as something other than a run-of-the-mill rally. Although Mr. Market has dispensed several sharp corrections, it’s hard to overlook the fact that a buy-and-hold strategy for, say, an S&P 500 Index fund has been a mostly non-stop party of late. Is that unusual? The answer depends on your definition of “unusual” and your choice of a time window. For some perspective, let’s stack up the latest trailing performances for the S&P against its track record through the decades.
Let’s begin with rolling 1-year returns since 1960 (based on 252 trading days). The current one-year performance (through yesterday, Jan. 6) is 28.2%. That’s an impressive gain, but is it out of the ordinary? Yes, it is. As the chart below shows, the top-quartile distribution of one-year returns for the S&P 500 since 1960 is a 18.3%-to-68.6% range. By that standard, the current one-year advance (indicated by the blue line) is easily in the top quartile—in fact, it’s a top-decile return. (The red line shows the theoretical returns if results followed a normal distribution.)
Next, consider how the latest 5-year annualized return compares with history (1260 trading days). The current 9.5% increase is middling relative to history since 1965 — the performance ranks just below the median return. To be sure, earning a 9.5% through time is no one idea’s of weak results. But from the perspective of how the S&P has behaved for this time window the current 5-year performance is hardly extraordinary.
Let’s conclude our brief review of performance distributions with the 10-year annualized return, which is currently 11.2% (based on 2520 trading days). That translates to just below the 80th decile – a moderately extraordinary result.
In an upcoming post, I’ll continue this series by comparing S&P 500 in terms of risk and reviewing how the current profile stands up vs. history.
During Refinitiv Lipper’s fund-flows week that ended May 24, 2023, investors were overall net purchasers of fund assets (including both conventional funds and ETFs) for the sixth...
Investors were net purchasers of fund assets (including those of conventional funds and ETFs) for the fourth week in a row, injecting a net $4.6 billion for the LSEG Lipper...
Following an aggressive interest rate hiking cycle throughout 2022 and 2023, cracks began appearing in the U.S. banking sector by March, disproportionately affecting smaller...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.