Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Liberal U.S. lawmakers withdraw Ukraine letter after blowback

Published 10/25/2022, 12:57 PM
Updated 10/26/2022, 01:06 AM
© Reuters. U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and other caucus members hold a news conference in advance of the expected House passage of H.R. 6376, the "Inflation Reduction Act of 2022" at the U.S. Capitol in Washington

By Patricia Zengerle

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A group of liberal U.S. Democrats withdrew a letter to the White House urging a negotiated settlement to the war in Ukraine, the group's chairperson, Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal, said on Tuesday, after blowback from within their own party.

“The Congressional Progressive Caucus hereby withdraws its recent letter to the White House regarding Ukraine," Jayapal said in a statement. She added: "The letter was drafted several months ago, but unfortunately was released by staff without vetting."

The letter signed by 30 caucus members became public on Monday, leaving some other Democrats feeling blindsided just two weeks before Nov. 8 mid-term elections that will determine which political party controls Congress. And it appeared just as Republicans face concerns that their party might cut back military and humanitarian aid that has helped Ukraine since Russia invaded in February.

Several members of the Progressive Caucus issued statements expressing support for Ukraine, noting that they had joined other Democrats in voting for billions of dollars in aid for Ukraine.

Some said they had signed the letter months earlier and that things had changed. "Timing in diplomacy is everything. I signed this letter on June 30, but a lot has changed since then. I wouldn't sign it today," Representative Sara Jacobs said on Twitter.

Representative Jamie Raskin, who also signed, said in a statement he was glad to learn it had been withdrawn and noted "its unfortunate timing and other flaws."

Ukraine's troops have been waging a successful counteroffensive, with forces advancing into Russian-occupied Kherson province and threatening a major defeat for Moscow.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

'BLANK CHECK'

The letter drew immediate pushback, including from within the Progressive Caucus. "Russia doesn't acknowledge diplomacy, only strength. If we want Ukraine to continue as a free and democratic country that it is, we must support their fight," Democratic Representative Ruben Gallego, a caucus member, said in a written comment.

Representative Kevin McCarthy, the top House Republican, told Punchbowl News in an interview this month that there would be no "blank check" for Ukraine if Republicans take over. That fed speculation that Republicans might stop aid to Kyiv, although many members of the party said that was not their intention.

In her statement withdrawing the letter, Jayapal said that, because of the timing, the letter was being conflated as being equivalent to McCarthy's remark.

"Nothing could be further from the truth. Every war ends with diplomacy, and this one will too after Ukrainian victory. The letter sent yesterday, although restating that basic principle, has been conflated with GOP opposition to support for the Ukrainians’ just defense of their national sovereignty. As such, it is a distraction at this time and we withdraw the letter," Jayapal's statement said.

State Department spokesperson Ned Price said both Democrats and Republicans support continued assistance for Ukraine and he did not think the letter would put U.S. support into question.

"In recent days, we've heard from Democrats, we've heard from Republicans, that they understand the need to continue to stand with Ukraine, to stand for the principles that are at play here," he told a news briefing.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

That was a terrible signal to send by the democrats to the world and to ukraine who are suffering daily and fighting for their right to freedom and democracy. You would normally only expect these statements from trump psykofants who loves putin
🤣🤣🤣🤣 Nuclear war it is.
   Not sure why you called the JCPOA a Democrats deal.  It was agreed in 2015 when Republicans had majority in both houses of Congress.
  I didn't intend to imply support or opposition to JCPOA.  One can reasonably believe that Iran would continue progress (as Iran did) on building nukes after JCPOA and still support the deal, since one can believe it's as good as we can negotiate, that its better than no deal, that it at least slowed Iran's progress, etc.  Trump said he will get a better deal, but he just exited it & failed to get any deal.
Trump certified to Congress that Iran is still complying before exiting the deal.
Good I hate appeasement
Must be a trans man thumbing this down. Probably snipped it off and everything?
Before Trump's entry into politics, we thought the Democrats were more wimpy & pro-appeasement than the pro-M.I.C. Republicans .
Opposing the "Axis of Evil" and "Evil Empire" and their ilk used to be part of Republican values.  Now retrumplicans are pro-Russia/pro-Putin; they are the real rinos.
Those Democrats made a mistake releasing that letter, considered the criticisms' merits and now has the good grace to withdraw it.  So unlike how retrumplicans would've handled it.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.