Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Landmark Hong Kong security trial wraps up in test for rule of law

WorldJul 20, 2021 07:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

By James Pomfret

HONG KONG (Reuters) -The trial of the first person charged under Hong Kong's national security law wrapped up on Tuesday, with the prosecution seeking to designate a slogan popular during 2019 protests as subversive in a crucial test of the city's rule of law.

Former waiter Tong Ying-kit, 24, has pleaded not guilty to charges of terrorism, inciting secession and dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm on July 1 last year, shortly after the law was enacted.

As the first national security case conducted in open court, Tong's case could set precedents on the handling of security law cases for the more than 120 other people charged under it, including prominent democrats and activists.

    The verdict will be delivered on July 27 by a panel of three judges; Esther Toh, Anthea Pang and Wilson Chan - who were picked by Hong Kong's pro-Beijing leader to hear national security cases.

Tong faces up to life in prison, as set out in the national security law. Someone convicted of a "grave" national security offence could be jailed for at least 10 years, the law says.

Tong was denied bail and a jury, factors that stoked concern among some Western governments and rights groups as a significant departure from century-old common law traditions.

The court had cited the safety of jurors and their family members in denying trial by jury. Defence lawyers argued that the right to a jury was a "hallowed principle" of the common law system.

On July 1 last year, a day after the law came into effect, Tong rode a motorcycle with the protest slogan "Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of our Times" fluttering on a flag from the back as he drove into a group of riot police, injuring three of them.

    He was arrested and charged with "incitement to secession" as well as terrorism and dangerous driving.

Tong has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The interpretation of the protest slogan, which was spray-painted on walls and chanted regularly during anti-government demonstrations that roiled the Chinese-ruled city in 2019, has been at the heart of the trial.

In his closing submission, government prosecutor Anthony Chau argued that Tong had displayed the flag to incite others to commit secession, including protesters gathered nearby, some of whom clapped as Tong rode past.

He also said that Tong had used his motorcycle as a “lethal weapon” and the slogan on his flag showed he was “pursuing a political agenda”.


The government has long held that the slogan suggests a call for independence, which would violate the security law, though no legal ruling has been made on that interpretation.

Tong's defence lawyer, Clive Grossman, argued on Tuesday it was a phrase with "multiple interpretations", including the desire for freedom and democracy.

Much of the trial involved debate between professors drawing on a range of topics including ancient Chinese history, the U.S. civil rights movement and Malcolm X, to ascertain whether the "Liberate Hong Kong" slogan is subversive.

Two expert witnesses called by the defence to analyse the slogan's meaning, drawing upon sources including an examination of over two million online posts, found "no substantial link" between the slogan and Hong Kong independence, Grossman said.

Prosecutor Chau, however, challenged, that, saying this "empirical data analysis is irrelevant, and not reliable” and could not assist the court in understanding the meaning of the slogan.

Tong's case has been closely watched in the city of 7.5 million. Critics say it shows Hong Kong’s rule of law is under strain with the upending of common law traditions that had been a bedrock of the city’s success since Britain handed it back to China in 1997 under a "one country, two systems" formula aimed at preserving its freedoms and role as a financial hub.

Those traditions include the presumption of bail, the presumption of innocence and the right to a jury, according to submissions by defence lawyers reviewed by Reuters.

The government has said that all prosecutions have been handled independently and according to law and that legal enforcement action has nothing to do with the political stance, background or profession of those arrested.  

The defence argued that Tong hadn't undertaken a terrorist act with his motorcycle. A shield allegedly thrown by a policeman as he rode by, Grossman said, could have been a reason for the "accident or a collision" with the officers.

Landmark Hong Kong security trial wraps up in test for rule of law

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email