Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

U.S. Supreme Court pick Jackson stresses God and country amid Republican attacks

Published 03/21/2022, 06:05 AM
Updated 03/21/2022, 08:26 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Supreme Court nominee and federal appeals court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson meets with U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) (not pictured) in his office on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 10, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

By Moira Warburton, Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joe Biden's nominee to become the first Black woman on the U.S. Supreme Court, stressed her patriotism and Christian faith on Monday while Republicans asked whether she has a hidden agenda that favors criminals.

In her opening statement during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, Jackson said she was blessed to be "born in this great nation" and added: "I must also pause to reaffirm my thanks to God, for it is faith that sustains me at this moment." Jackson, 51, pledged independence if confirmed by the Senate to the nation's top judicial body and embraced a limited role for jurists.

Jackson, who has served since last year as a federal appellate judge after eight years as a federal district court judge, also reflected on opportunities she had that her parents, who grew up in era of racial segregation in the South, did not.

"My parents taught me that, unlike the many barriers that they had had to face growing up, my path was clearer, such that if I worked hard and believed in myself, in America I could do anything or be anything I wanted to be," Jackson said.

In opening statements by committee members, Democrats hailed the historic nature of Jackson's selection for the lifetime post and praised her judicial record. Republicans took aim at her record and tried to link her to advocacy groups on the left, while some tried to paint Jackson as "soft on crime."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The harshest attacks came from Senators Josh Hawley and Marsha Blackburn. Hawley has suggested Jackson was overly lenient toward certain child pornography defendants when sentencing them to prison terms - claims that sentencing experts have called misleading.

"I can only wonder: what's your hidden agenda?" Blackburn asked. "Is it to let violent criminals, cop killers and child predators back to the streets?"

As the hearing unfolded, Biden touted Jackson on Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) as "a brilliant legal mind." Biden, who as a candidate in 2020 pledged to appoint a Black woman to the court, last month nominated Jackson to succeed retiring liberal Justice Stephen Breyer, 83.

"Members of this committee: If I am confirmed, I commit to you that I will work productively to support and defend the Constitution and the grand experiment of American democracy that has endured over these past 246 years," Jackson said.

"I have been a judge for nearly a decade now, and I take that responsibility and my duty to be independent very seriously. I decide cases from a neutral posture. I evaluate the facts, and I interpret and apply the law to the facts of the case before me, without fear or favor, consistent with my judicial oath," she added.

Her confirmation would not change the ideological balance of the Supreme Court, which includes three conservative justices appointed by Biden's Republican predecessor Donald Trump. But it would let Biden freshen the court's liberal bloc with a justice young enough to serve for decades.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

'NOT EASY'

If confirmed, she would be the 116th justice to serve on the high court, the sixth woman and the third Black person. With Jackson on the bench, the court for the first time would have four women and two Black justices.

"It's not easy being the first. You have to be the best and in some ways the brightest," Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, the committee's chairman, told her.

Durbin said attacks on Jackson's approach to criminal justice issues are baseless and her judicial record showed she would not be a "rubber stamp" for Biden. Durbin noted that law enforcement organizations including the Fraternal Order of Police have endorsed Jackson's nomination.

Jackson faces questions from senators on Tuesday and Wednesday. Republicans said among other things they would ask her whether she supports efforts on the left to expand the Supreme Court to erase its current 6-3 conservative majority.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz sought to tie Jackson to Democratic criminal justice reform proposals pursued following the 2020 George Floyd killing in Minneapolis - efforts Republicans suggest caused a rise in violent crime.

Senator Lindsey Graham (NYSE:GHM), one of three Republicans who voted to confirm Jackson to her current position, said Black and Hispanic Republican judicial nominees have been asked tough questions by Democrats in prior confirmation hearings but Republicans would be called racists if they do the same.

"It's about 'we're all racists if we ask hard questions.' That's not gonna fly with us. We're used to it by now," Graham said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Biden's fellow Democrats narrowly control the Senate, which has the authority under the U.S. Constitution to confirm a president's judicial appointments. A simple majority vote is needed for confirmation, meaning Jackson would get the job if all Democrats are united regardless of what Republicans do in a Senate divided 50-50 between the two parties.

The Senate previously confirmed Jackson to three posts including last year, when Biden nominated her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Jackson was raised in Miami and attended Harvard Law School, later serving as a Supreme Court clerk for Breyer.

The two Black justices previously confirmed by the Senate were: Clarence Thomas, appointed in 1991 and still serving, and Thurgood Marshall, who retired in 1991 and died in 1993. Thomas, 73, is currently hospitalized after experiencing flu-like symptoms, though he does not have COVID-19, according to a court spokesperson.

Latest comments

Cruz and Hawley are outraged by the littlest things, such babies, oh but only if biden is president, otherwise anything goes for agent orange, good kool aid huh?
before her the court was practicing apartheid.
muscle testing shows her view of God is ungrateful
GOP is so hung up on race! therapy needed?
Funny how hard a smart black woman absolutely triggers the extreme snowflake republicans
Did youvtalk about snowflake Democrats when Clarence Thomas was being slandered?
She's a complete fraud, and it has nothing to do with the color of her skin! Plus, she really is not qualified for this position!
more qualified than comey barrett that said I respect precedents then after confirmation is going after precedents. what do you call that?
accusations without proof makes you look small! what happened no more pizza places trafficking children?
Al Gore invented her God and country….
🤣🤣🤣🤣. She’s lying
From the comments here, Judge Jackson is apparently some kind of unqualified communist. Here are the Republican senators who voted to confirm her appointment to the federal bench: Chuck Grassley (Iowa),,Mitch McConnell (Kentucky),,Richard Shelby (Alabama),,Jim Inhofe (Oklahoma),,Susan Collins (Maine)—twice!,,Mike Crapo (Idaho),,John Cornyn (Texas),,Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)—twice!,,Lindsay Graham (South Carolina)—twice!,,Richard Burr (North Carolina),,John Thune (South Dakota),,John Barrasso (Wyoming),,Roger Wicker (Mississippi),,Jim Risch (Idaho),,Roy Blunt (Missouri),,Jerry Moran (Kansas),,Rob Portman (Ohio),,John Boozman (Arkansas),,Pat Toomey (Pennsylvania) ,,John Hoeven (North Dakota),,Marco Rubio (Florida),,Ron Johnson (Wisconsin),,Rand Paul (Kentucky),,Mike Lee (Utah),,Tim Scott (South Carolina),,Ted Cruz (Texas),,Deb Fischer (Nebraska)
lol what ever
Nothing like a black woman achieving to agitate the racists losers.
Are you Brandon? Just because some may not agree with you they are NOT racist.
this racist bigot hack has no place on the court.
Brandon didn't go far enough. She's a she/her. Brandon should have chosen a blxck It/its/his/her/she/he
Snowflake,
When you are clutching at your chest, the room starts to go dark and you realize you are living the last seconds of your life, you'll know what I mean.
 xD
for mark manley skin color is everything....just like all Trump supporters... let's see the last one, an appointment Trump supported, has a drinking problem and has a history of sexually abusing young women....and whines and cries when he's confronted,. but he was a white conservative, so that's ok...
slumocrats are the only ones in the US who care about race. you people only have racism and division to sell because your other "ideas" have failed for decades. '22 '24
from her judicial experience and major support from the American bar association.. she is considered one of the most qualified candidates for the Supreme Court. and has in the past successfully had major support from both parties in the Senate,..
lmao
The only thing that is required is that the next Supreme Court justice that gets chosen is the most qualified Constitutional Law judge that is available, it has nothing to do with race, religion or gender. I want the best candidate chosen… period
Trump lost. lmao
 Wrong again. The truth will set you free. Cheating to win is un-American. Braaaaad...
No Bradley, I work for a living and don’t have time for racist argumentative little snowfkakes like you who hide behind hate. Good luck hating, see where it gets you my friend
This demonstration of American diversity is driving the Trump loser authoritarians crazy.
A
It's not skin color, culture, politics, or any other reason, I oppose this because of you read her comments and opinions, she is devoutly anti-American and anti-constitution
 look it up Braaaad.. nobody here is your secretary.. what are you lazy?
So you can't give me one example either?
 All over the news and net.. lift a finger.. you'll feel better about yourself.
they are only tough when it's a black woman, why is that?
LOL and tough on a white male falsely accused of ********a woman 35 years ago
Must be a CNN Lib Tarrrd.
Wow, when you're wrong, you're REALLY wrong. Haven't kept up on confirmation hearings in the last 20 years I see.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.