Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Federal judge blocks enforcement of Arkansas ban on most abortions

Published 07/20/2021, 11:01 PM
Updated 07/21/2021, 02:20 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A patient from Arkansas sits in the recovery room at the Hope Medical Group for Women in Shreveport, Louisiana, U.S., February 13, 2020. REUTERS/Lila Engelbrecht

By Steve Gorman

(Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday blocked enforcement of a newly enacted Arkansas law banning all abortions except in medical emergencies until she had a chance to decide a legal challenge to the statute on its merits.

U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker, sitting in state capital Little Rock, issued a preliminary injunction sought by opponents of the measure, one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the United States. It was due to take effect next Wednesday.

Passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature and signed into law in March by Republican Governor Asa Hutchinson, the measure would make it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion unless it was necessary to preserve the life of the pregnant woman.

No exceptions are permitted for cases of rape or incest.

A lawsuit contesting the constitutionality of the measure was brought in May by the women's health provider Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of Little Rock Planning Services, a clinic that performs abortions.

They have argued that the law would disproportionately impact minorities, lower-income women and those living in rural areas, all of whom face higher barriers to reproductive healthcare.

Baker ruled the plaintiffs were likely to prevail on the merits of the case in showing the law posed a "categorically unconstitutional" restriction to a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy before the fetus is considered viable outside of the womb.

Baker said the state has made no arguments to the contrary and instead took the position that the U.S. Supreme Court wrongly decided its 1973 landmark ruling in Roe v. Wade, which guaranteed a woman's right to abortion before viability, at around 24-28 weeks of gestation.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In her 21-page opinion, Baker also held that women seeking abortions in Arkansas faced irreparable harm if the statute in question were allowed to take effect while the challenge to it remained under review. The judge noted that Arkansas ranks as the fifth-poorest among the 50 U.S. states.

Like many other abortion restrictions enacted in Republican-led states in recent years, the Arkansas ban is part of a conservative effort to prompt the Supreme Court to roll back Roe v. Wade as the court's balance has tipped further to the right.

The governor himself said when he signed the law that it was intended to "set the stage for the Supreme Court overturning current case law."

The high court has signaled it was open to that possibility in May when it agreed to review Mississippi's bid to ban abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

According to the ACLU and Planned Parenthood, the Arkansas legislature has passed 20 restrictions on abortion in 2021 alone, the highest number of any state in a single year since 1978, when Louisiana approved that many.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.