Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Exclusive-New Biden abortion rights push addresses both women and men

Published 08/16/2022, 07:03 AM
Updated 08/16/2022, 02:26 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Joe Biden gestures as he delivers remarks on the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 at the White House in Washington, U.S., July 28, 2022. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

By Nandita Bose

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Cheered by a decisive win for abortion rights in a Kansas vote and eyeing November midterm elections, the White House is launching a push for abortion access that aims to influence men as well as women, sources with direct knowledge told Reuters.

The Biden administration's three-prong playbook leans on two specific federal statutes to target states that limit abortion, communicates to voters the impact on women, and accentuates how forced pregnancies negatively affect both women and men.

Senior White House officials, advisers and abortion rights advocates have held multiple strategy and engagement calls in recent days, including an Aug. 4 call with nearly 2,000 participants, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private meetings.

Abortion rights advocates have accused U.S. President Joe Biden's administration in the past of being slow to act around a Supreme Court ruling in June that ended the constitutional right to abortion. Two Biden executive orders and engagement with key stakeholders led by Vice President Kamala Harris have assuaged some concerns, several told Reuters.

The White House is "really going all the way in trying to promote their message on the issue of abortion in the midterms," said Lawrence Gostin, faculty director of Georgetown University's Institute for National and Global Health Law, who has been working with the White House. "They are hoping this will play well among suburban women and that was Biden's edge in the presidential election."

A senior White House official said that the administration thinks the issue could win Democrats' support from many Republican voters during the midterms.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

NEW LITIGATION STRATEGY

The Biden administration plans to lean on two specific federal statutes, which predated the abortion ruling, to fight its legal challenges - the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and FDA preemption under the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FDCA), the sources said.

EMTALA requires hospitals that accept Medicare funds to provide medical treatment to people that arrive with an emergency medical condition. That includes providing a woman an abortion if her life is in danger https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/hhs-says-federal-law-preempts-state-abortion-bans-emergency-situations-2022-07-11.

This law is the backbone of the U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit against the state of Idaho, but may be hard to enforce, some legal experts say https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/federal-guidance-life-saving-abortions-puts-doctors-bind-2022-07-20.

The FDA preemption argues states cannot ban an approved abortion drug because federal law preempts or overrides state law. More than 30 states have enacted legislation that restricts access to medication.

Mini Timmaraju, president, NARAL Pro-Choice America, who also is working with the White House on the issue, said the litigation strategy is key.

"It's not just executive orders and policies, it's (legal)enforcement," she said.

VOTING, RESEARCH AND MESSAGING

The White House plans to replicate the success in Kansas, said the sources. It is closely tracking similar ballot initiatives in California, Kentucky, Michigan, and Vermont and gubernatorial races like Michigan's, where abortion has become a central issue, sources said.

In Kansas, a team of the Democratic National Committee made about 30,000 phone calls and sent over 130,000 text messages to help turn out the vote.

The White House is compiling research on the physical and mental harms women face if they're denied access to abortion, as well as the economic impact that forced pregnancies can have on men, women and families; and plans to communicate that to voters with a consistent messaging plan, sources said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

It will target men in its messaging, asking them to consider how their sisters, nieces, cousins could be affected if abortions were unavailable, and to think about the costs related to supporting an unplanned pregnancy, the sources said.

In 2020, the National Bureau of Economic Research found that women who are forced to have an unwanted baby face medical costs associated with prenatal care, birth, postpartum recovery in addition to costs associated with raising a child that exceed $9,000 a year.

Another message will be aimed at religious Americans, telling them they don't have to change their faith to support abortion rights, they just need to resist government overreach, they said.

"The idea is to be much more disciplined and consistent in messaging to break through to the everyday American," said one of the sources.

Latest comments

The reason why abortion rights federal laws cannot be passed is because American citizens (those irritating female homosapiens with voting rights in America) do not agree on which laws to have passed. On the one side are those who want to have laws passed giving American citizens(female homosapiens with voting rights) the right to have abortions. These desired laws, by American citizens, would function irregardless of secondary American citizens( irritating male homosapiens with voting rights) opinion on preservation of their unborn child/children. On the other side are those who want to give American citizens the right to deny other American citizens the right to do what they want with their body. These desired laws would function irregardless of secondary American citizens opinion on whether American citizens can make them fork over obscene amounts of money to American citizens every month for the rest of their lives. life is so unfair to American citizens! Maybe we should vote a f
carlos:  ********rates fall more under a Democrat potus than under a GOP potus
* Abort ion rates
FDA approves the sale of a medication, it does not mandate the sale.
great president! so many wins for the people not the rich!
Life is precious. It's so sad that the left wants to snuff out these completely innocent lives. God help us.
you pay for their care
"Life is precious."  -- says the conservatives who support the death penalty, right to purchase amour piercing bullets, invasion of various countries and deportation of asylum seekers
... and hanging Pence, and separating babies/children from their parents, and telling people to risk covid death/injuries by opposing masks/vaccines & take livestock de-wormer instead, and sending death deaths to clinics doctors & election workers & journalists & Democrat politicians & Handy Hooks parents, etc. ....
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.