Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolio

Chip designers warm to U.S. bill despite big benefits to Intel

Published 07/18/2022, 06:03 AM
Updated 07/19/2022, 01:51 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Semiconductor chips are seen on a circuit board of a computer in this illustration picture taken February 25, 2022. REUTERS/Florence Lo/Illustration
INTC
-
QCOM
-
NVDA
-
MU
-
TXN
-
AMD
-

By Stephen Nellis

(Reuters) - Major U.S. chip firms on Monday were coming around to support a package of chip industry subsidies despite earlier concerns that legislation awaiting a vote in the Senate disproportionately benefits manufacturers like Intel Corp (NASDAQ:INTC).

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has told lawmakers that a vote could come as early as Tuesday on a slimmed-down set of bills to bolster the U.S. computer chip industry, after Democratic lawmakers cleaved them from a larger, more contentious bill.

The bills are aimed at making the U.S. more competitive against a rising China, whose chip industry has grown rapidly over the last five years to account for almost 10% of global sales.

The measures include $52 billion in subsidies and an investment tax credit to boost U.S. manufacturing. The bills have bipartisan support.

Powerful Republican Senator John Cornyn on Sunday tweeted that proceedings on the bill have a "green light" after Democrats pared back their ambitions for unrelated spending bills.But a rift had emerged last week within the chip industry itself, with some players concerned the final language of the legislation would provide disproportionate support to manufacturers like Intel while doing little to support chip designers like Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) Inc, Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM) Inc and Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) Corp.

Intel, along with firms like Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) and Micron Technology Inc (NASDAQ:MU), designs and manufacturers its own chips. Such firms would benefit from the $52 billion in CHIPS Act subsidies to build factories and also from an investment tax credit to purchase tools for use inside their factories from another measure called the FABS Act.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Intel earlier this year said it would spend $20 billion on a factory in Ohio after breaking ground on two new plants in Arizona last year. AMD, Qualcomm and Nvidia design their own chips but tap partners to fabricate them and would see no direct benefit from subsidies to build plants or tax support for tools.

They support a separate version of the FABS Act introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives that contains both the manufacturing tax credit and a tax credit for chip design activities that would directly benefit them.

That version of the FABS Act - which is more pleasing to a broader swather of chip industry players - is also the one the Semiconductor Industry Association, which represents U.S. chip firms, had called on lawmakers to pass.

“We're encouraged that the legislation is progressing, and we continue to support enactment of $52 billion in CHIPS Act investments and a FABS Act investment tax credit for both manufacturing and design," the association said in a statement on Friday.

The current Senate legislation contains no design tax credit. An SIA spokesperson on Monday said the major chip design companies have told the association they do not plan to oppose the bill over the issue. An AMD spokesperson on Monday said the company supports the current legislation.

Nvidia declined to comment, and Qualcomm and Intel did not return requests for comment.

The lack of a chip design tax credit had prompted some U.S. companies, which asked not to be named for fear of industry and government blowback, to debate their support for the Senate bill if the final language that comes to the floor has no tax credit for design activities, two people familiar with matter said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"You have Intel that might get $20 billion with CHIPS Act plus $5 billion or $10 billion under the FABS Act. So $30 billion goes to your direct competitor, and you don't get a penny? That's going to cause problems in the market," said one person at a company that debated its position on the bill, speaking on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to talk to the press.

"It's going to benefit just a few companies," said a person at a second company that deliberated its support for a bill with no design credits who was not authorized to speak to the press.

Latest comments

This will be good for America. Let's hope it gets done.
Ya but Intel is spending 6X that minimum building a factory. nvda and amd aren't spending anything
The key is the chip industry needs to innovate instead of begging for money. For the chip industry , it used to be a world market of no competion, and the chip industry was used to making billions of profit. Now, things are changing, the chip industry needs to learn how to win in the new world market, which is new innovation instead of free money but rearm themselves with better and more effective operation. A baby will never stand up and walk if it can not learn how to walk
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.