Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
🚨 Our Pro Data Reveals the True Winner of Earnings Season Access Data

Breaking News

U.S. crude inventories up 4.14M barrels last week, hit 20-month highs

U.S. agency considering rule reining in non-compete agreements for workers

Stock Markets Jan 09, 2020 09:25PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FTC Presser on Facebook settlement in Washington

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), one of two agencies that enforce antitrust law, is considering a rule aimed at reining in corporations from pushing employees to sign non-compete agreements that prevent them from working for rival companies, officials said at a workshop on Thursday.

The practice of requiring workers to sign an agreement barring them from quitting for a similar job elsewhere appears to have begun among white collar professions, like doctors and tech workers, and were aimed at protecting trade secrets and encouraging training of workers. They have since spread to low-wage jobs that require minimal training.

A famous non-compete dispute between the Illinois state attorney general and the fast-food franchise Jimmy John's ended in 2016, when the chain agreed not to enforce a prohibition on workers at its sandwich shops taking jobs with competitors. The state had argued the non-compete agreement was illegal.

Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, a Democrat on the FTC, said she had not prejudged a decision on a rule but seemed skeptical of such agreements.

"We know that non-compete clauses can limit employee mobility and competition even in states where non-compete clauses are legally unenforceable," she said at the FTC workshop.

Any decision on a rule limiting corporate non-compete agreements would be made by the agency's five commissioners, three Republicans and two Democrats.

Noah Phillips, a Republican commissioner, also seemed skeptical of non-compete agreements because of their potential to reduce labor mobility. However, he indicated he was reluctant to have the FTC to tackle the issue due to a lack of specific authority from congress or historical precedent for them to do so.

"Some stakeholders are pushing for the FTC itself to address non-competes through a rule-making," Phillips said. "We heard a little less however about the legal basis for doing so. This is a real issue that gives me, someone who is concerned about non-competes, pause."

A long list of states, including California, limit or ban the agreements. Eighteen state attorneys general, including from California, Illinois, Massachusetts and New York, urged the FTC in July to stop the use of non-compete agreements, as well as agreements between companies to not poach each others' workers.

U.S. agency considering rule reining in non-compete agreements for workers
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email