Please try another search
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Ben & Jerry's, a brand of Unilever, is seen on display in a store in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., March 24, 2022. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly
By Jessica DiNapoli and Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Unilever (NYSE:UL) plc asked a U.S. judge to dismiss a lawsuit by Ben & Jerry's over the sale of its Israeli ice cream business, saying the subsidiary's "insistence on taking sides" in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict gives its board no authority to stop or even sue over the sale.
In a filing on Friday afternoon in Manhattan federal court, Unilever said Ben & Jerry's board "is no ordinary board."
The board, it said in the filings, has some responsibility to preserve its "social mission" and safeguard the brand under the shareholder agreement from 2000, when Unilever bought Ben & Jerry's. But Unilever said that the board cannot sue.
Unilever also said the board's "recent insistence on taking sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict created an untenable situation" for both sides.
Ben & Jerry's could not immediately be reached for comment.
The maker of Cherry Garcia and Chubby Hubby ice cream originally sued Unilever in July to block the sale of its business in Israel and the occupied West Bank to local licensee Avi Zinger.
Ben & Jerry's products have been on sale in Israel for more than three decades, but the company said last year that West Bank sales were inconsistent with its values.
In August, a judge rejected Ben & Jerry's bid to immediately halt such sales.
Last month, Ben & Jerry's board renounced the sale of its ice cream by Zinger, saying his products "should not be confused with the products" made by Ben & Jerry's.
"The sale of products bearing any Ben & Jerry's insignia in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is against our values," the board said.
In its motion to dismiss the lawsuit, Unilever also said Ben & Jerry's waited too long to claim that its trademark rights were "covertly" taken away more than 20 years ago, and that accusations underlying the claim were a matter of public record.
(This story has been refiled to fix a spelling error in paragraph 1)
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.