Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

Florida board picked by DeSantis countersues Disney

Published 05/01/2023, 11:54 AM
Updated 05/01/2023, 06:36 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: People gather ahead of the "Festival of Fantasy" parade at the Walt Disney World Magic Kingdom theme park in Orlando, Florida, U.S. July 30, 2022.  REUTERS/Octavio Jones/File Photo

By Dawn Chmielewski and Tom Hals

(Reuters) - A district board appointed by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to oversee development around Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS) Co's Florida theme parks sued the company on Monday to void "backroom deals" favorable to the entertainment giant.

The state court lawsuit escalates tensions between Disney and the Republican governor and likely presidential candidate. It comes in response to a case Disney filed last week in federal district court against DeSantis and members of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight district board.

Disney accused DeSantis and his supporters of illegally using state government to punish the company for exercising its free-speech rights last year when Disney criticized a state measure banning classroom discussion of sexuality and gender identity with younger children. DeSantis who is expected to soon declare his candidacy for U.S. president, has repeatedly attacked "woke Disney" in public remarks.

"Since Disney sued us, we have no choice now but to respond," board Chair Martin Garcia said at a Monday meeting. 

The lawsuit in state court in Orange County, Florida, seeks to invalidate an agreement prior board members made with Disney, arguing it amounted to a one-sided deal that was rubber stamped.

The Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board maintained that Disney rushed through the agreement before the new board assumed oversight of municipal services and development within the 25,000 acres of land in and around Walt Disney World.

“In an effort to stymie Florida’s elected representatives, Disney covertly cobbled together a series of eleventh-hour deals with its soon-to-be-replaced puppet government,” the lawsuit alleged. “Disney hoped to tie the hands of the new, independent Board and to preserve ... its own government in the District for at least the next 30 years."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The lawsuit argues that Disney worked with its "puppet board" to "perpetuate its stranglehold" over the district, insulating itself from the new board by adopting a developers agreement and restrictive covenants.

The DeSantis-appointed board said the agreements were "riddled with procedural and substantive defects" that render them void and unenforceable. The lawsuit argues the prior board failed to provide adequate public notice or follow proper procedures.

Disney's lawsuit argued that the company did what any prudent developer would do: use tools to secure its future development plans. The company said the oversight board, then known as the Reedy Creek Improvement District, complied with public notice requirements and held public meetings.

Florida lawmakers passed legislation that ended Disney's virtual autonomy in central Florida where the Disney World theme parks attract millions of visitors each year.

In its lawsuit, Disney also took issue with the DeSantis-appointed board's assessment that development contracts Disney reached with its predecessors were "void." Those deals laid the foundation for billions of dollars of future investment in its Walt Disney World resort.

"The government action was patently retaliatory, patently anti-business, and patently unconstitutional," Disney said in its filing.

Martin said the oversight board is merely following laws enacted by the Florida legislature, through actions taken to promote the public good.

"The district will seek justice in state court here in central Florida where both it and Disney reside and do business," Martin said.

There was a chance the two lawsuits would run simultaneously in state and federal court, where Disney sued DeSantis and the board, said Mary-Rose Papandrea, a professor at University of North Carolina School of Law.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

One possible outcome would be for the first case to reach a resolution that then might then be applied in the other court, said Papandrea. However, the claims in the cases differ, making that difficult.

DeSantis weighed in on the Disney dispute at a press conference on Monday.

"It is wrong for one corporation to basically corrupt the local government and run it as its own fiefdom, be exempt from laws, have all kinds of benefits that nobody else has," DeSantis said.

The Florida governor said he is carrying out the "will of the people," and Disney is "putting their thumb in the eye of the voters of the state."

Disney did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit.

DeSantis’ clash with Disney has been a centerpiece of his speeches around the United States ahead of his expected presidential bid. But his political risks have mounted as the battle has intensified.

Former President Donald Trump, favorite for the Republican nomination, has said on social media that DeSantis "is being destroyed by Disney" and has warned the company would reduce its investments in Florida.

Latest comments

More maga communism. Watch as they throw socialist money at their cronies in oil and agriculture while attacking enterprises’ free speech.
revoking an unfair priviledge is not a form of coercion and can be done for any reason. I would sue Desantis for allowing Disneys uncompetitive special treatment to continue as long as he did. isn't he for free market capitalism? what took him so long to level the playing field?
it took me rereading my post to realize my mistake please substitute the word anticompetitive any where you see the word uncompetitive in my post
  Assuming you're right about "too many cronies", then DeSantis should target all of them instead of at Disney alone.
agreed
Disney is just calling attention to it's own divisive politics by getting into the headlines. all politics aside this is a huge PR mistake.
I'm just commenting on how I dont believe this will be in their best interest even most democrats dont side with this gender dysphoria education for kids. it's a money loser at least. go woke go broke isn't just a catchy phrase.
whereas Desantis will become more popular among his constituency and among many democrats as well
the problem is rob most democratic voters don't side with Desantis... Desantis is against free speach unless that "free speech" is in total agreement with his policies..
welcome to the dystopian state of Florida....
no matter whether it's individuals or corporations that disagree with the state.the primary goals of fascism is to bring decent to it's knees.....intimidation, book burning, political blackmail are tools of the fascist state...
Like Trump says, go woke, go broke. Leave the sex out of it.
tom, doing things Trump has recommended has put a lot of people in jail...
  Non-woke Fox News is being sued toward bankruptcy  ;-)
Time for Disney to move to South Carolina
Go Woke, Go Broke. Time for Floridians to show Disney who's boss !
jaundiced you apparently don't look at statistics on so-called "woke" businesses...
  Retrumplicans ain't for free speech, either.
The sleepy are more prone to go broke.
I wouldn't drink bud lt.or go to Disney for free. .
clay has trouble with his "feelings" when it come to à man cross dressing......
I wouldn't either.  But I'm not gonna try to impose my good taste on others.
close all woke cos..
That's an attack on free speech.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.