
Please try another search
By Sam Boughedda
The Wall Street Journal claimed Wednesday that Elon Musk and his team are weighing up whether to use up to $3 billion in potential new fundraising to repay a portion of the $13B Twitter debt, but Musk himself denied the claims in a tweet.
The report states that sources revealed that in December, Musk's representatives discussed potentially selling as much as $3B in new Twitter shares.
It adds that Musk's team told people familiar with the finances of the company that an equity raise, if successful, could be used to pay down an unsecured part of the debt.
However, in a swift dismissal of the report, Musk responded to a user on Twitter who posted a picture of the news, writing "no."
The WSJ had written in the report that in mid-December, Musk's team spoke to existing backers about raising new equity capital at the original Twitter takeover price.
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.