🔮 Better than the Oracle? Our Fair Value found this +42% bagger 5 months before Buffett bought itRead More

Chesapeake Energy loses in $1.3 billion bond dispute appeal

Published 11/25/2014, 02:36 PM
© Reuters.  To match Special Report CHESAPEAKE-MCCLENDON/LOANS
CHK
-
BK
-
NG
-

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A divided federal appeals court said Chesapeake Energy Corp had no right to redeem $1.3 billion of notes early at a favorable price, saying the second-largest U.S. natural gas company waited too long to tell investors of its plans.

Tuesday's 2-1 decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York reversed a May 2013 ruling by U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer that had allowed Chesapeake to redeem the notes six years early.

The majority agreed with bond trustee Bank of New York Mellon Corp that Chesapeake's March 15, 2013 notice to redeem its 6.775 percent notes maturing in 2019, saving more than $100 million of interest payments, came one month late.

Bank of New York Mellon argued that the redemption could shortchange hedge funds and other bondholders, and that "the only fair and practical way" to treat them was to interpret any ambiguity in the bond documents against Chesapeake.

Investors favoring the bank's view included Archer Capital Management LP, Ares Management LLC, Aurelius Capital Management LP, Carlson Capital LP, Cetus Capital LLC, Latigo Partners LLC, Monarch Alternative Capital LP, P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LP, River Birch Capital LLC and Taconic Capital Advisors LP.

Chesapeake said in a statement: "We are reviewing this decision and assessing our options." Bank of New York Mellon spokesman Kevin Heine declined immediate comment.

The redemption was intended to ease a debt burden that Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake had accumulated under former Chief Executive Aubrey McClendon, and offset natural gas prices that had fallen to their lowest in a decade.

Writing for the appeals court majority, Circuit Judge Pierre Leval said bond documents showed "unambiguously" that Chesapeake missed its deadline to redeem its notes at 100 cents on the dollar plus interest.

He returned the case to Engelmayer, who had ruled after a week-long non-jury trial, to consider whether Chesapeake should pay a "substantially higher make-whole price," which court papers said could cost the company more than $400 million.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla dissented from the majority decision, saying more scrutiny was needed of Chesapeake's intent in drafting the bond documents.

Chesapeake redeemed its notes in May 2013, recording a $33 million loss, as part of a refinancing. Bank of New York Mellon continued its appeal on behalf of affected bondholders.

© Reuters.  To match Special Report CHESAPEAKE-MCCLENDON/LOANS

The case is Chesapeake Energy Corp v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-1893.

(Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Chizu Nomiyama)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.