🚀 AI-picked stocks soar in May. PRFT is +55%—in just 16 days! Don’t miss June’s top picks.Unlock full list

Big banks in $1.865 billion swaps price-fixing settlement

Published 09/11/2015, 03:07 PM
© Reuters. A man walks along Wall Street in New York
C
-
BAC
-
GS
-
JPM
-
HSBA
-
BARC
-
NWG
-
CSGN
-
DBKGn
-
BNPP
-
PSON
-
AIG
-
MS
-
CME
-
INFO
-
UBSG
-

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Twelve major banks have reached a $1.865 billion settlement to resolve investor claims that they conspired to fix prices and limit competition in the market for credit default swaps, a lawyer for the investors said on Friday.

The settlement in principle was disclosed at a hearing before U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan.

"We think it's historic," Daniel Brockett, the investors' lawyer, said in an interview. "It's one of the largest antitrust class-action settlements, and an extraordinary result for the class."

The defendants include Bank of America Corp (N:BAC), Barclays Plc (L:BARC), BNP Paribas SA (PA:BNPP), Citigroup Inc (N:C), Credit Suisse Group AG (VX:CSGN), Deutsche Bank AG (DE:DBKGn), Goldman Sachs Group Inc (N:GS), HSBC Holdings Plc (L:HSBA), JPMorgan Chase & Co (N:JPM), Morgan Stanley (N:MS), Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc (L:RBS) and UBS AG (VX:UBSG).

Other defendants are the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and Markit Ltd (O:MRKT), which provides credit derivative pricing services.

Credit default swaps are contracts that let investors buy protection to hedge against the risk that corporate or sovereign debt issuers will not meet their payment obligations.

The market peaked at $58 trillion in 2007, according to the Bank for International Settlements, but shrank to $16 trillion seven years later as investors better understood its risks.

American International Group Inc's (N:AIG) CDS exposure was a major factor behind the 2008 federal bailout of that insurer.

In the lawsuit, investors including the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association and Salix Capital US Inc claimed that the defendants' activity caused them to pay unfair prices on CDS trades from late 2008 through the end of 2013, even though improved liquidity should have driven costs down.

They also said the banks tried in late 2008 to thwart the launch of a credit derivatives exchange being developed by CME Group Inc (O:CME) by agreeing not to use new CDS platforms and pushing ISDA and Markit not to provide licenses to the exchange.

An ISDA spokeswoman said the group is "pleased the matter is close to resolution" and committed to helping ensure the safe and efficient functioning of the CDS market.

Representatives for the other defendants declined to comment.

U.S. and European regulators have also examined potential anti-competitive practices in the CDS market.

Investors' lawyer Brockett, a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, said Cote gave both sides two weeks to iron out details before submitting a settlement for her preliminary approval.

Quinn Emanuel and Pearson (LONDON:PSON), Simon & Warshaw are co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs.

© Reuters. A man walks along Wall Street in New York

The case is In re: Credit Default Swaps Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-md-02476.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.