Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Free Webinar - Crude Oil Trading 2023 | Thursday, February 9, 2023 | 01:00PM PST Enroll Now

Arizona county certifies midterm election vote after court order

Politics Dec 01, 2022 08:16PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A woman walks to cast her ballot at the register of voters during early voting in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S., October 29, 2020. REUTERS/Edgard Garrido/

By Ned Parker

(Reuters) - A conservative, rural Arizona county that had defied a state deadline to certify its Nov. 8 midterm election results relented on Thursday after a judge said state law required the approval.

Superior Court Judge Casey McGinley ruled at a hearing on Thursday that the Cochise County board of supervisors did not have the right to block certification.

“The board of supervisors has a nondiscretionary duty to canvas the returns,” McGinley said during the livestreamed hearing, citing Arizona law. He added “it has no authority to change vote totals or reject the election results.”

The two Republicans on the county's three-member board of supervisors had resisted the certification because they said they wanted to hear more evidence from those who have argued, without evidence, that the county’s voting machines were not properly certified. The state disputed that claim.

Arizona’s Secretary of State's office filed a lawsuit against the board on Monday after the county officials defied the state deadline for certification. Arizona law requires counties to certify election results by Nov. 28, ahead of the state's certification on Dec. 5.

Soon after the court hearing on Thursday, the board approved the election results. Tom Crosby, one of the two Republicans who had opposed certifying the vote, skipped the meeting, but said in an email to Reuters he did so on the advice of the board's attorney. He did not provide further details.

Peggy Judd, the other Republican member, said in the meeting she had no choice after the court order but to approve the results.

"I can't say enough about how important this effort is that we made, and I am not ashamed of anything I did," she said.

"People have lost their faith in elections," she added.

Arizona has been at the center of battles over election fraud allegations since former President Donald Trump falsely claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him. Several recounts of the 2020 votes in Arizona and elsewhere confirmed Joe Biden's victory.

Arizona's Republican candidate for governor this year, Kari Lake, embraced Trump’s stolen election claims and has refused to concede after losing to her opponent, current Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, by just over 17,000 votes in the Nov. 8 election.

The defeat of Lake and other election deniers was seen as a powerful rebuke of candidates who echoed Trump’s myths of a stolen election, but some activists who promote false theories of voter fraud have refused to accept the results.

Voting rights expert Ryan Snow of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law said he was unaware of any other case where a local board, whose role in the election process is limited to ratifying the work of election officials, had refused to certify the vote "on the basis of a thoroughly debunked conspiracy theory."

Last June in New Mexico, Otero County, which had objected to not carrying out a hand count of their primary election, only certified the results after a court ordered them to do so.

Arizona county certifies midterm election vote after court order
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
gab nea
gab nea Dec 03, 2022 9:11AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
the judge said Arizona was illegally blocking certification! Arizona doesn't follow it's own laws? or the US constitution? why ? for the orange mess?
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Dec 02, 2022 5:46AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Peggy Judd, the other Republican member, said in the meeting she had no choice after the court order but to approve the results. "I can't say enough about how important this effort is that we made, and I am not ashamed of anything I did," she said."People have lost their faith in elections,"."  -- of course people lost their faith because MAGA deniers keep coming up with crazy theories, with no proof whatsoever, about nonexisting election frauds, but if you really feel that strongly about it, by all mean feel free not to vote in future elections
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email