🔮 Better than the Oracle? Our Fair Value found this +42% bagger 5 months before Buffett bought itRead More

UPDATE 1-Teva, J&J settle oral contraceptive patent case

Published 07/24/2009, 11:19 AM
Updated 07/24/2009, 11:32 AM
FLG
-
99V33V1Z3=MSIL
-

* Teva gains license to sell generic in 2015

* Teva pays royalty to J&J

* J&J up 0.8 percent, Teva rises 0.6 percent

By Lewis Krauskopf

NEW YORK, July 24 (Reuters) - Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd said on Friday it settled a patent infringement lawsuit with Johnson & Johnson over Teva's U.S. generic version of J&J's Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo birth control pill.

As part of the settlement, Teva, which briefly sold its generic version earlier this month before ceasing shipments, obtained a license to re-enter the market on December 31, 2015, or earlier in certain circumstances. The product's patent is set to expire in 2019, a J&J spokesman said.

Israel-based Teva, the world's largest generic drugmaker, will also pay J&J a royalty based on sales of its generic that it shipped. Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo had annual U.S. sales of about $400 million for the year ended in March, according to data provided earlier this month by Teva.

"This settlement compensates us for loss caused by their at-risk launch and recognizes the patent is valid and enforceable," J&J spokesman Greg Panico said. Panico said the companies were not disclosing specific terms of the settlement.

Teva shares rose 0.6 percent in morning trading, while J&J climbed 0.8 percent.

Teva said on July 1 it launched its generic version after winning regulatory approval. It said then it would have 180 days as the lone generic -- a right traditionally afforded to generic companies first to challenge patents.

But six days later, Teva said it ceased shipments pending the resolution of a preliminary injunction sought by J&J related to the patent infringement case against Teva.

During its launch, Teva was able to ship four to six months supply of its generic, Panico said.

The settlement comes as U.S. antitrust regulators and Congress are taking a closer look at patent settlements between brand and generic drugmakers amid allegations they shortchange consumers by delaying the arrival of low-cost generic drugs while the companies profit.

Many settlements that have drawn objections involved a payment from brand companies to generic firms -- what critics call "pay-for-delay" deals. But Natixis Bleichroeder analyst Corey Davis noted the Teva-J&J settlement involved the opposite -- a payment from Teva back to J&J.

"By not having any payments from the innovator, the (Federal Trade Commission) can have little basis to complain," Davis said in a research note.

Teva said the settlement will not become effective until the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey overseeing the case upholds the validity and enforceability of J&J's patent.

J&J shares rose 74 cents to $60.96 on the New York Stock Exchange. Teva shares were up 28 cents to $50.47 on the Nasdaq. (Reporting by Lewis Krauskopf; Editing by Derek Caney)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.