Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Free Webinar - Decode the market's secrets! | Tuesday, May 30, 2023 | 01:00PM EDT Enroll Now

Mexicans turn out in droves to protest electoral overhaul, see democracy at risk

Published Feb 26, 2023 05:03AM ET Updated Feb 27, 2023 01:38AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Mexico's President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador speaks to the media during a news conference at the Old City Hall (Antiguo Palacio del Ayuntamiento), in Mexico City, Mexico January 20, 2023. REUTERS/Henry Romero

By Dave Graham

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Huge crowds gathered in Mexico on Sunday to condemn government moves to shrink the electoral authority as a threat to democracy, in what appeared to be the largest protest so far against President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador's administration.

Organizers said over 500,000 people turned out in Mexico City, with video footage on social media showing the central Zocalo square filled with protesters, who also spilled out into adjoining streets. One police officer nearby said he had heard the half a million figure, while others gave lower estimates.

Mexico City government, which is controlled by Lopez Obrador's party, said 90,000 people took part.

Mexico's Congress on Wednesday approved a major overhaul of the National Electoral Institute (INE), an independent body which Lopez Obrador has attacked as corrupt and inefficient.

The 69-year-old president denies his changes will weaken Mexican democracy. Critics have vowed to take the legislation, which slashes the INE's budget and staff as well as paring back its responsibilities, to the Supreme Court.

Veronica Echevarria, a 58-year-old psychologist from Mexico City at the protest, said she feared Lopez Obrador's INE shake-up was a bid by the president to stay in power. He denies this.

"We're fighting to defend our democracy," Echevarria said, wearing a cap emblazoned with the words "Hands off the INE."

She and thousands of others converged on the Zocalo on Sunday morning, many of them holding Mexican flags and dressed in pink, the INE's color. Shouts of "Viva Mexico!" and "Lopez out!" rang out periodically as the mass of people advanced.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Brian Nichols pitched in on the protests late on Sunday, saying on Twitter the electoral reforms were "testing the independence of electoral and judicial institutions."

"The United States supports independent, well-resourced electoral institutions that strengthen democratic processes and the rule of law," he added.

The INE and its predecessor played a key role in creating a pluralistic democracy that in 2000 ended decades of one party rule, according to many political analysts.

Fernando Belaunzaran, an opposition politician who helped to organize the protests, argued the INE changes weakened the electoral system and increased the risk of disputes clouding the 2024 elections when Lopez Obrador's successor will be chosen.

"Normally presidents try to have governability and stability for their succession, but the president is creating uncertainty," said Belaunzaran. "He's playing with fire."

Mexican presidents may only serve a single six-year term.

Belaunzaran said on Twitter over 500,000 people had gathered in the capital on Sunday to oppose the INE overhaul. He said demonstrations were taking place in more than 100 cities.

Protests were held in states including Jalisco, Yucatan, Nuevo Leon, Queretaro, Guanajuato and Veracruz, according to news reports and footage broadcast on social media.

At least 22,000 people gathered in Nuevo Leon's capital Monterrey, newspaper Excelsior said, citing local authorities. Another 20,000 took to the streets in the heart of the Jalisco capital, Guadalajara, news network Milenio reported.

Angel Garcia, a 50-year-old Mexico City protestor, said the demonstrations were also an appeal to the Supreme Court to rule the INE overhaul violated the constitution.

If Mexico did not protect the INE, its democracy would be sent "back to the past," argued Garcia, a lawyer.

"It's now or never," he said.

Lopez Obrador, a leftist who contends he was robbed of the presidency twice before he finally romped to a crushing victory in the 2018 election, argues the INE is too expensive and biased in favor of his opponents. The institute denies this.

The president has cast Sunday's protests as a partisan attempt by the opposition to discredit his government.

According to the INE, the president's overhaul violates the constitution, curbs its independence and eliminates thousands of jobs dedicated to safeguarding the electoral process, making it harder to hold free and fair elections.

Lopez Obrador, whose approval ratings still run at 60% or higher in opinion polls, has also weakened other autonomous bodies that check his power on the grounds they are a drain on the public purse and hostile to his political project.

He says his INE shake-up will save $150 million a year.

Polls show the president's National Regeneration Movement (MORENA), which in just a few years has become the dominant force in Mexico, is a strong favorite to win the 2024 election.

Antonio Mondragon, a retired dentist at the Mexico City protest who voted for Lopez Obrador in 2018, said people were fed up with the president behaving like a "dictator."

"We need to get back to being a democracy," said the 83-year-old Mondragon, "because the man is going mad."

Mexicans turn out in droves to protest electoral overhaul, see democracy at risk
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (5)
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Feb 26, 2023 8:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Reminds me of when the leftists in rhe US, the tried to destroy Democratic institutions by first lying to their supporters about the results of a presidential election, cajoling officials to fabricate votes, concocting a scheme to have people falsely attest to being duly elected electors for the losing candidate, trying to convince the Vice-President to reject real electors and accept the fraudulent and, when it looked like that wasn't going to work, sending a violent mob to interrupt election proceedings. They almost got away with it, those leftists trying to destroy US democratic institutions.
William Smith
William Smith Feb 26, 2023 6:53PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Same in America as the leftists try to take control by destroying long proven constitutional prudence.
First Last
First Last Feb 26, 2023 3:54PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Retrumplican attack on US suffrage has knock-on effects on democracies abroad.
marki bigjohnson
marki bigjohnson Feb 26, 2023 3:54PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You probably didn't understand 5 words in that article. Socialist like you have a major authoritarian streak
Isaac Hafez
Isaac Hafez Feb 26, 2023 2:26PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Another leftist trying to destroy democratic institutions to grab power
JIM VETTER
JIM VETTER Feb 26, 2023 2:26PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
sounds familiar doesn't it
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Feb 26, 2023 2:26PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Indeed! In the US, the leftists tried to destroy Democratic institutions by first lying to their supporters about the results of a presidential election, cajoling officials to fabricate votes, concocting a scheme to have people falsely attest to being duly elected electors for the losing candidate, trying to convince the Vice-President to reject real electors and accept the fraudulent and, when it looked like that wasn't going to work, sending a violent mob to interrupt election proceedings. They almost got away with it, those leftists trying to destroy US economic institutions.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Feb 26, 2023 2:26PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
*democratic institutions.
marki bigjohnson
marki bigjohnson Feb 26, 2023 2:26PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
everything you said is straight out of some deep blueannon sites. Russia hacked the election machines. The 2020 election was iffy. talk to any European, and they will say it didn't look legitimate
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Feb 26, 2023 2:26PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
LOL. Okie dokie.
Marco Castro
Marco Castro Feb 26, 2023 12:15PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
It’s odd yo see these colums in investing. I really hope the deed can be done and slashes the INE into pieces. This basically a budget cost reduction, and removal of corrupt peopple that in favor of the obvious group who commits fraud left and right stealing mexican taxes in mass. Its funny that they claim a change to the INE its unconstitutional, but changed to it were done to it before tomfavor those in the top
Don Getty
Don Getty Feb 26, 2023 12:15PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
political corruption and tampering effect global markets especially a country thats part of nafta - 150 mil is pocket change which could likely be found elsewhere - when people at the top want to restructure the systems that protect voting that is a democratic issue thats there to keep dictatorships from taking over - unsure look at china, russia, iran, N Korea etc etc - people in power via the gun
Isaac Hafez
Isaac Hafez Feb 26, 2023 12:15PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Don Getty could not have said it better!
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email