Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Pelosi says new Senate infrastructure plan could be a hard sell

Published 06/13/2021, 09:29 AM
Updated 06/13/2021, 02:15 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks during a news conference on infrastructure on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 12, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Democrats will not back down on President Joe Biden's sweeping infrastructure goals, House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Sunday, signaling turbulence ahead for a scaled-back bipartisan proposal unveiled in the Senate.

Biden has set his sights on a sweeping infrastructure bill that would both revamp the nation's roads and bridges as well as boost spending on services including healthcare and child care -- though Republicans reject the idea that those latter priorities even qualify for the label "infrastructure."

A bipartisan group of ten Senate moderates on Thursday reached a deal https://www.reuters.com/world/us/senate-republican-leader-mcconnell-new-infrastructure-plan-collins-2021-06-10 for an infrastructure plan that a source familiar said would cost $974 billion over five years and includes $579 billion in new spending. That was well below Biden's current $1.7 trillion proposal, and it was unclear if it would gather enough support to pass the 50-50 Senate.

"If this (bipartisan plan) is something that can be agreed upon, I don't know how we can possibly sell it unless we know there is more to come," Pelosi, a Democrat, told CNN's "State of the Union." Biden, she said, has "no intention of abandoning" the rest of his vision.

Pelosi appeared to be hinting at a scenario in which Congress passes a bipartisan infrastructure bill and Democrats then follow up by pushing through a second spending measure using a process called reconciliation, which bypasses Senate rules requiring 60 votes to advance most legislation in the 100-seat chamber.

Senator Susan Collins, a Republican member of the group that unveiled the new proposal on Thursday, said that plan sticks to spending on physical infrastructure like roads and bridges.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

She said she personally had been an advocate for home health care but this could be considered separately.

"We can look at these issues but they are not infrastructure. And they should be considered separately and I believe they will be," Collins told CBS' "Face the Nation."

Many Republicans question government funding for care of the elderly and children, especially at the levels Biden wants. He initially proposed $400 billion for elderly and disabled care, and another $200 billion for childcare.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has said that while Democrats are seeking a bipartisan infrastructure deal, they are simultaneously pursuing reconciliation.

But this would require Democrats - who have thin majorities - to be united. That could pose another challenge, with party members like Senator Joe Manchin saying he does not want to see the process abused.

A leading House progressive Democrat said she preferred Democrats to pass their priorities without Republican votes rather than settling for "much less" in a bipartisan infrastructure bill. "It's worth going it alone if we can do more for working people in this country," Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told CNN.

Collins told CBS that the bipartisan infrastructure plan would be partly paid for by unspent COVID-19 funds: "There's literally hundreds of billions of dollars in the pipeline."

Collins said the plan also included an "infrastructure financing authority" and a provision for electric vehicles to "pay their fair share" since they don't pay the federal gas tax. She said the gas tax would not be increased.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

$200B for childcare? wow
Obama/Biden squandered $1 Trillion on shovel ready jobs. Biden hasn't dont anything about infrastructure in 48 years. The money will be for unions and it will go into DNC
and you source this info from where exactly
Yea Yea Yea.  It is mostly money for shemales not infrastructure.
Polosi wants to TAX owners of EV ‘s lol So there is no savings in buying one. Save on gas ? No. Your electric bill will be doubled what it is now. AND now she wants you to pay another TAX . Because. Lol There is no savings whatsoever in buying a EV . If you are a city dweller, they are fine to cut down on smog and noise pollution. But it will cost you more than a ice car. If the liberals are involved, it means that you will PAY MORE. More Tax, Just wait for the inflation to kick in . Doesn’t hurt the ricjh and well hedged . Kills the poor . The very same poor that voted them in . They never learn
what bull
it's Susan Collins with bipartisan group whose plan include tax in EV.... read the article
I think somehow the magical world of the stock market will see this as positive and reach another ATH
How old is Nancy?
Looks like 90, buy is probably 45 . Most of those liberal women hit the wall around 23.
saw a pic of her at 18 when Kennedy was pres. she has some *******
still does, big ones
Dems is good for businesses because they print money and spend like there is no tomorrow.
Trump added $6.7T.... learn how to use Google... Obama $8.6T
Dems print money like there is no tomorrow because they way they are heading tomorrow is not looking good😔
Trumps four years are going to seem like heaven compared with Biden’s scheme. Tax tax tax inflation, tax Gas to 5 -6 bucks kills the poor that voted for him. I love it. 5 - 6 bucks for gas doesn’t hurt the rich one bit. But kills a family or 6 living in the ghetto. Like they can afford a EV or even the skyrocket electric bill they will receive after charging that thing. Lol
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.