Breaking News
0

Exclusive: White House delays new farm aid payments on China trade hopes - sources

CommoditiesDec 11, 2018 08:07PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. A farmer harvests his field at his farm in Pecatonica

By Humeyra Pamuk and Jarrett Renshaw

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The White House is delaying additional payments from a $12 billion aid package for farmers stung by President Donald Trump's trade war with China because it expects Beijing to resume buying U.S. soybeans, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The move comes despite a lack of evidence in agricultural markets of any return by China to the U.S. soy market. China last year purchased about 60 percent of U.S. soybean exports, but it has not inked any new soybean deals since Beijing imposed tariffs on U.S. supplies in July.

Trump told Reuters in an interview late on Tuesday that discussions to resolve U.S. trade disputes with Beijing were taking place by telephone, and that China was "just starting" to buy "tremendous amounts" of U.S. soybeans.

The Office of Management and Budget at the White House is now holding up approval of the second and final tranche of aid payments Trump had promised farmers stung by the trade disputes due to concern over the cost of the program, and because it wants to see if the trade issues with China are resolved, the three sources told Reuters.

The sources asked not to be named because the matter had not yet been made public.

"It has been no secret that OMB has not been terribly excited about the trade aid package," one of the sources said. The source added, however, that the payments will likely eventually be approved after some "back and forth."

The U.S. Department of Agriculture in July had authorized up to $12 billion in aid for farmers and ranchers hit by the fallout from Trump's escalating trade war with China and the agency outlined payments for the first half last August.

An announcement on the second tranche had been expected in early December. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said on Dec. 3 that OMB was deliberating on the second round of trade aid, and that it could be outlined by the end of that week.

On Tuesday, USDA spokesman Tim Murtaugh told Reuters that the agency was still in the "final stages" of the process of approving the second tranche of payments.

"We are in discussions with the White House and anticipate that the second payment rates for the Market Facilitation Program will be published before the end of the year," Murtaugh said in a statement.

The Office of Management and Budget declined to comment.

CHINA COMEBACK?

The sources said the White House was delaying its approval mainly on hopes China will soon resume purchases of soybeans, which has raised questions over how much aid farmers will need.

China had imposed a 25 percent tariff on American soybeans in July in retaliation for U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods.

Perdue said last week China will probably resume buying American soybeans around Jan. 1, after talks between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping during the G20 meeting about a potential trade ceasefire.

However, little concrete evidence has emerged of a purchase looming and farmers have been on edge.

Chicago Board of Trade soybean futures edged higher on Tuesday on hopes that new deals would be inked soon, but there were no signs of increased activity in the cash markets.

U.S. Agriculture Department rules require exporters to promptly report sales of 100,000 tonnes or more of a commodity made in a single day.

John Heisdorffer, the chairman of the American Soybean Association and a farmer in Iowa, said he feared the government was going to reduce the size of the aid payments to farmers on misplaced beliefs the trade pain was ending.

"There are a lot of farmers that sold beans out of the field and that is done," Heisdorffer said. "They need to get the extra (support) to make sure that they're taken care of."

Exclusive: White House delays new farm aid payments on China trade hopes - sources
 

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments
Holly Sorensen
Holly Sorensen Dec 11, 2018 9:32PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
thats messed up! but i expect nothing else fro 45...he always renigs on promised payment like ha promised Mexico to pay for a wall that noby wants or needs
Reply
0 0
Alvin Tostig
Alvin Tostig Dec 11, 2018 8:33PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
paying farmers who lose money is anti American. Free market baby! Grow something else and quit begging for handouts from tax paying Americans.
Reply
1 0
Suman Jutur
Suman Jutur Dec 11, 2018 7:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Farmers asked for this. Too bad.
Reply
0 0
Jeani Rector
Jeani Rector Dec 11, 2018 2:09PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This is what the farmers voted for. This is what they get, bankruptcy just like their leader did five or six times.
Reply
3 0
Gabe Domen
Gabe Domen Dec 11, 2018 1:49PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Poor the farmers... but after all they voted Vaporware... a master in trading and deal tactics...
Reply
1 0
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email