Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Ideology, not market, driving coal decisions -Australia resources minister

CommoditiesOct 14, 2021 04:16AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Coal is unloaded onto large piles at the Ulan Coal mines near the central New South Wales rural town of Mudgee in Australia, March 8, 2018. REUTERS/David Gray/File Photo

MELBOURNE (Reuters) -Global regulators, banks and investors are making ideological rather than market-based investment decisions around coal, which will still have solid demand in the coming decades, Australia's Resources Minister Keith Pitt told Reuters on Thursday.

Pitt's National Party, a junior member of Prime Minister Scott Morrison's governing coalition that represents many Australians in coal-producing districts, has refused to support a net-zero carbon emissions target by 2050 for the country, the world's biggest coal exporter.

The National's position has held Morrison back from committing to attend the COP26 climate conference in Glasgow next month, where global leaders will meet to set further climate goals to follow on from the landmark 2015 Paris accord.

Pitt said that record high prices for the fuel show that Australia's second-most lucrative export should be supported and financiers and insurers that are divesting from the industry are not making decisions based on the economics.

"The (financial) market is not making a viability decision, they are making an ideological decision," Pitt said. "If it was a decision solely based on what they think forecasts are, well, demand is up, forecasts are up."

Pitt has proposed the government set up an A$250 billion ($180 billion) lending facility for the industry to replace the lack of private financing, in return for his party's support of the 2050 net-zero emissions target.

The National Party will meet this weekend to decide whether to support the 2050 target, though Pitt did not say what the party plans to do.

"I want to be very clear to Australia's banks and the world's banks, they don’t set domestic policy in this country," he said.

"We need to support those industries and support Australians' economic wealth and growth and provide jobs for Australians."

Australia expects rising coal demand out to about 2030 and then fall about 40% from that peak by 2050, Pitt said, based on a pipeline of new coal-fired power plants and ready demand for Australia's high energy steelmaking coal.

About 140 gigawatts (GW) of coal plants are under construction and more than 400 GW are at various stages of planning, Pitt said, citing International Energy Agency figures.

Pitt downplayed alternative energy sources that would transition the world away from more polluting fuels for power generation such as coal.

Hydrogen markets would take decades to develop, he said, while examples of governments getting the energy transition wrong could be seen in the UK and European energy crisis where power costs were "through the roof", showing that intermittent renewables don't work.

In conrast to Pitt's stance, a top central banker said on Thursday that Australia could face rising costs of capital and divestment by offshore funds if it is not seen to be doing more to address climate change.

Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) Deputy Governor Guy Debelle noted isolated examples of divestment from Australia because of climate risk, and said that the likelihood of more significant divestment was increasing.

But Pitt said that the RBA should "stick to their knitting".

"They should worry about what is happening in terms of potential inflation and making sure our economy stays strong and has the ability to pay Australia’s bills."

Ideology, not market, driving coal decisions -Australia resources minister
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
dan mat
dan mat Oct 14, 2021 3:14AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Let's destroy the planet and let forests burn for the sake of wealth and jobs and economic growth.
Thomas Colton
Thomas Colton Oct 14, 2021 3:14AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Lets ruin the global economy transitioning to green energy too quickly
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email