Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Exclusive: Brazil oil tanker collision reveals offshore regulatory gaps

Commodities Nov 28, 2018 01:56AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Oil tankers are docked at the Guanabara Bay in the state of Rio de Janeiro

By Alexandra Alper and Marianna Parraga

RIO DE JANEIRO (Reuters) - Brazil has more than doubled the number of risky ship-to-ship oil transfers this year, but its monitoring of such offshore maneuvers is lax, to a point where a July 2017 collision between two tankers was not reported, according to a Reuters review of government and shipping records.

Transfers are projected to keep rising as the country's deep-water discoveries have lured major companies including Exxon Mobil Corp (N:XOM) and Royal Dutch Shell Plc (AS:RDSa) to recent offshore auctions. During these maneuvers, ships pull alongside one another and oil is transferred to a vessel via high-pressure hoses. The practice has only been allowed since 2013 in Brazilian waters.

However, weak monitoring makes it difficult to track the most basic statistic: how many transfers have taken place.

The Brazilian Navy said it has logged 59 ship-to-ship deliveries by oil producers through Oct. 30, up from 28 last year, but Shell and a Repsol (MC:REP) Sinopec joint venture have already done 65 transfers through October. A Navy spokesman was unable to immediately account for its lower figure.

Companies are expected to tell authorities of ship-to-ship (STS) transfers, especially if there is damage or oil spilled in the ocean, but not all do, according to Reuters' review of government and shipping records and interviews with 16 representatives of maritime agencies, lawmakers, regulators and service providers.

Most oil-producing countries allow the practice, but with greater oversight. In Uruguay, for instance, at least two Navy police officials must be present during the offshore operations.

Brazil's oil regulator and Navy both said they were never informed of the 2017 collision of two vessels during a STS oil transfer. STS operator Knutsen NYK Offshore Tankers estimated one of the vessels involved suffered $1 million in damages from the collision.

Critics say the lapse points to lax oversight by officials.

"Current legislation is too flexible, allowing companies to do what they want," said Congressman Nilto Tatto. "We must improve rules so that the government assumes its responsibility and we must make companies comply."

COLLISION AT SEA

Brazil's oil regulator ANP and the nation's Navy each said they were never informed of the collision while an internal Knutsen's document reviewed by Reuters noted authorities were told, without specifying which agency.

John Einar Dalsvag, a Knutsen vice president, in an email said there was no need for any official report to authorities because there was no environmental impact and damages were "minor."

The collision occurred during a seaborne transfer of oil conducted by U.K.-based STS provider Fendercare Marine, the Knutsen record showed.

Fendercare referred questions on the incident to Royal Dutch Shell, which produced the crude transferred. A Shell spokesman said there was a "minor collision," adding it complies with all laws where it operates.

The number of STS transfers in Brazil could reach 300 by 2022, according to Erik Cunha, sales chief at OceanPact Servicos Maritimos SA, a firm that handles marine oil spills. Brazil's offshore production is expected to reach 2.9 million bpd next year, and 4 million bpd by 2027, according to consultancy Wood Mackenzie.

(GRAPHIC: Brazil's offshore oil production continues to rise - https://tmsnrt.rs/2DKqFwi)

SELF-REPORTING RULES

STS providers and their customers say the practice is safe. Customer data compiled by maritime consultancy Dynamarine show less than 1 percent of worldwide STS operations result in collisions. Oil spills that enter the ocean during transfers are extremely rare, it said.

Brazil relies on tanker operators and STS providers to self-report to the Navy and ANP any collisions and accidents that result in "material damage."

"There is no way of monitoring operations 24 hours a day," said Brazilian Navy official Pericles Arraes, who said no report on the 2017 collision was needed since oil was not spilled and workers were not harmed. He commended the Navy's monitoring, adding: "it is a constant improvement process."

But David Zee, a professor of oceanography at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, called Brazil's self-reporting "a procedural failure."

"Would I let my student grade his own test?" Zee said.

Ibama, the nation's environmental regulator, uses radar to check for offshore spills, scanning each stretch of the ocean every six days, said Fernanda Pirillo, emergencies coordinator for Ibama. It has found none from STS operations since transfers began in 2013.

Exclusive: Brazil oil tanker collision reveals offshore regulatory gaps
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email