Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Cyber Monday Extended SALE: Up to 60% OFF InvestingPro+ CLAIM OFFER

Biofuel makers seeks changes to aviation fuel tax credit in Biden spending plan

Commodities Sep 16, 2021 05:41PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Farmer Roger Hadley harvests corn from his fields in his John Deere combine in this aerial photograph taken over Woodburn, Indiana, U.S., October 16, 2020. REUTERS/Bing Guan 2/2

By Jarrett Renshaw

(Reuters) - Biofuel producers are seeking last-minute changes to a proposal to boost production of sustainable aviation fuel tucked in the Democrat's $3.5 trillion spending plan that they say will allow the nation's farmers to join the emerging multi-billion market.

The changes center on how the carbon-saving benefits of producing the fuel are measured, and could force the White House to choose between environmental groups who believe using land and food supply for fuel squanders earth's resources, and farm and agribusiness groups hoping to benefit from the push to stop climate change.

The White House said last week it wants to cut aircraft greenhouse-gas emissions by 20% by decade's end by significantly boosting the use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Currently, less than 1% of the roughly 21.5 billion gallons of jet fuel burned each year in the United States is SAF, but the White House set a target of 3 billion gallons by 2030.

It has backed a $1.75 to $2 a gallon tax credit for sellers and users of sustainably produced fuel to offset the higher cost, which can be up to three times more than regular fuel.

SAF is currently produced from used cooking oil and animal fat, and even supporters of the increased targets consider the goal ambitious.

Biofuel groups say it's completely impossible without tapping into feedstocks like ethanol and soybean oil, and want the current model used to determine eligibility for the tax credit to be changed to allow them to participate.

They argue the plan relies on a "biased" model that exaggerates the impact on land use of farm grown biofuel feedstocks and would deny farmers access to the lucrative credit. They are pushing for a different model developed by the U.S. Energy Department.

"If we use a modeling that is outdated and we don't utilize that blessing that we have, there could be a lost opportunity not just for farmers but for this whole project, this whole initiative," said Dustin Marquis, director of government relations at Marquis Energy.

The White House goals will be a "fantasy" if the current legislation is left untouched, said Brooke Coleman, Executive Director of the Advanced Biofuels Business Council.

"We need farm-based feedstocks to hit the target, and that won't happen if we let a European bias dictate advanced biofuel production in the U.S," Coleman said.

The White House did not respond to request for comment.


In order to be eligible for the tax credit, the current legislation says a producer would have to demonstrate a carbon score that is at least 50 percent better than the fossil fuel alternative.

The scoring system would be based on a model developed by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) that has land-use penalties that are three times higher than the leading U.S. model known as GREET, which was developed by the U.S. Department of Energy.

Democratic Congressman Brad Schneider, of Illinois, is the lead sponsor of the tax credit legislation in the House. He is seeking an amendment to the bill that would leave it up to the Biden administration to make any final model determination.

Pedro Piris-Cabezas, the director for Sustainable International Transport at the Environmental Defense Fund, says the ICAO model accurately accounts for direct and indirect land-use changes caused by increased demand for farm-based fuels like ethanol and soybeans.

Among other things, increased demand for crops causes land to be cleared in the United States and abroad, including rain forests. He also noted that the model allows farmers significant opportunity to lower their carbon scores by adopting new technology, like carbon sequestration or clean energy.

"The goal here is not to have taxpayers pay for something that will have a detrimental impact on the environment," Piris-Cabezas said.

He added that relaxing the model or injecting discretion in its implementation will "jeopardize the environmental integrity" of the plan and confuse an industry seeking to invest billions of dollars into its growth.

(This story removes the description of European from model developed by International Civil Aviation Organization in paragraphs 7 and 13)

Biofuel makers seeks changes to aviation fuel tax credit in Biden spending plan

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Alan Rice
Alan Rice Sep 16, 2021 5:43PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
biofuel: idiocy.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email