Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Best And Worst Of The Information Technology Sector, 3Q16

Published 08/05/2016, 02:18 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Sector Analysis 3Q16

The Information Technology sector ranks fourth out of the ten sectors as detailed in our 3Q16 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter, the Information Technology sector ranked fourth as well. It gets our Neutral rating, which is based on an aggregation of ratings of 29 ETFs and 123 mutual funds in the Information Technology sector as of July 14, 2016. See a recap of our 2Q16 Sector Ratings here.

Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst rated ETFs and mutual funds in the sector. Not all Information Technology sector ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 25 to 383). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings.

Investors seeking exposure to the Information Technology sector should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1: ETFs with the Best and Worst Ratings – Top 5

ETFs with the Best and Worst Ratings – Top 5

* Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best and Worst Ratings – Top 5

Mutual Funds with the Best and Worst Ratings – Top 5

* Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Fidelity Advisor Communications Equipment Fund (FDMIX, FDMCX, FDMTX) and Saratoga Advantage Technology & Communications Portfolio (STPIX) are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (NASDAQ:TDIV) is the top-rated Information Technology ETF and Fidelity Select Communications Equipment Portfolio (FSDCX) is the top-rated Information Technology mutual fund. Both earn a Very Attractive rating.

ARK Innovation ETF (NYSE:ARKK) is the worst rated Information Technology ETF and Dreyfus Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) is the worst rated Information Technology mutual fund. ARKK earns a Dangerous rating and DTGRX earns a Very Dangerous rating.

491 stocks of the 3000+ we cover are classified as Information Technology stocks.

Juniper Networks (NYSE:JNPR: $23/share) is one of our favorite stocks held by FSDCX and earns a Very Attractive rating. JNPR is on July’s Most Attractive Stocks list as well. Over the past decade, Juniper has grown after-tax profit (NOPAT) by 12% compounded annually. Juniper has improved its return on invested capital (ROIC) from 4% in 2005 to 12% in the last twelve months.

Furthermore, the company generates significant free cash flow, $3.9 billion over the last decade. Despite the fundamental strength of the firm, JNPR remains undervalued. At its current price of $23/share, JNPR has a price-to-economic book value (PEBV) ratio of 0.7. This ratio means that the market expects Juniper’s NOPAT to permanently decline by 30%. If Juniper can grow NOPAT by just 3% compounded annually for the next decade, the stock is worth $33/share today – a 43% upside.

ACI Worldwide (NASDAQ:ACIW: $20/share) is one of our least favorite stocks held by UNSCX and earns a Very Dangerous rating. ACIW was recently featured in the Danger Zone as well. Over the past decade, ACIW’s economic earnings have declined from $3 million in 2005 to -$26 million in 2015. Over the last twelve months, economic earnings have fallen even further to -$48 million.

The company’s ROIC peaked in 2006 at 14% and has since declined to a bottom-quintile 5%. Despite the deterioration of the business, ACIW is priced for significant profit growth. To justify its current price of $20/share, ACIW must grow NOPAT by 10% compounded annually for the next 11 years. This expectation seems overly optimistic compared to ACIW guiding for 4-7% organic revenue growth in 2016 and achieving organic revenue growth of only 3% in 2015 and -2% in 2014.

Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Information Technology ETFs and mutual funds.

Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs from the Worst ETFs

Information Technolgy ETF Landscape

Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds from the Worst Mutual Funds

Information Technology Mutual Fund Landscape

Disclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.