Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Last Week In The US: Worrying Trend In Prices

By BNP Paribas (Philippe d'Arvisenet)Market OverviewMay 19, 2013 07:15AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/last-week-in-the-us:-worrying-trend-in-prices-167540
Last Week In The US: Worrying Trend In Prices
By BNP Paribas (Philippe d'Arvisenet)   |  May 19, 2013 07:15AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
This past week was a busy week, and despite stronger-than-expected retail sales in April, the general tone of data releases was rather gloomy. Such data, especially prices, are in fact consistent with the Fed not slowing down the monthly pace of security purchases, something to keep in mind when the minutes of the latest FOMC meeting will be released on Wednesday.

The week began on a very positive footing, with retail sales reporting to have gained 0.1% in April. The strength was widespread, as only few retailers saw their sales declining over the month: gas stations (-4.7%), food and beverages (-0.8%) and health and personal care (-0.1%). Sales of everything else were up, from building materials (+1.5) and cars (+1.0%) to clothing (+1.2%). Excluding volatile items (cars), price-sensitive sectors (gas) and building materials (which are part of residential investment and not private consumption in US national accounts), retail sales were up a very solid 0.5% in April. In short, the soft patch did not spread beyond March. On a 3-month annualised basis, retail sales were up 4% in April, with the core index up 4.2%. Such data are consistent with a steady GDP growth over the first half of 2013.

However, news from the business sector was not as supportive, with industrial production down by 0.5% in April. The decline was mainly due to falling activity in electric and gas utilities, and manufacturing production was actually up by 0.2%. Smoothed over three months, the deceleration is however unquestionable: in February manufacturing production was growing an annualised 7.7%, a pace cut to 3.4% in April. Prospects are uncertain as orders and surveys send conflicting messages.

Excluding highly volatile data for transport and defence industries, manufacturing new orders accelerated a bit in March, up an annualised 7.5% (after 3.4% in February and 6.6% in December). On the other hand, regional surveys are pointing to further deterioration in activity. The manufacturing surveys conducted by the Fed of New York and Philadelphia in their respective districts, highlight another deterioration in sentiment. Our NEM Index (calculated from these survey-data in a way that allows direct comparisons with the ISM index) lost 0.6 point to 49.4 in May, with inventories bringing the only positive contribution. Such a development is not positive as inventories may have risen because of weak demand, which would announce further contraction in production in the months ahead. Still, regional surveys proved mixed leading indicators as lately. In April, even if it was down, the ISM index was not as bad as announced by the NEM Index, remaining above the 50-threshold with the new orders component increasing.

The most concerning news of the week came from the trend in prices. Far from highlighting a build-up of upward pressures on prices, data are signalling too mark a slowdown in inflation. The recent deceleration in inflation could be a cause for concern. Until recently, the slower rate of price increases was obvious when measured with the deflator for private consumption expenditures but more questionable when measured by the consumer price index. With March and April CPI reports, this changed. The index for non-food non-energy consumer prices has been decelerating from 2.1% in 2012 and 1.9% in Q1 2013 to 1.7% in April. Using a narrower measure (excluding fruit, vegetables, gasoline, fuel oil, natural gas, homeowner equivalent rent of primary residence, inter-city transportation and tobacco products, following the preferred measure of the Bank of Canada), the trend is even more pronounced. This “augmented”-core CPI was up by a limited 0.6% y/y in April, following 1.0% in Q1 2013 and 1.7% in 2012. This is the slowest pace of growth since end-2010.
Inflation is running too slowly
Inflation is running too slowly

It is difficult to explain this deceleration in prices, even though a limited pace of increase in prices is not surprising. For price pressures to appear either production costs have to accelerate or demand has to be larger than supply. As for costs, the main one is labour. On that front, even if conditions are gradually improving, the unemployment rate remains high enough to prevent wages from accelerating. Additionally, even if it slowed, labour productivity remains robust. In Q1 2013, unit labour costs were indeed up a very limited 0.5% (quarterly annualised rate). As for supply, over-capacities remain large as shown by the still large negative output gap. This lack of price pressure is confirmed by the trend in prices at early stage of processing. Non-petroleum import prices are down on a year-on-year basis for the second month in a row, a trend experienced since the second half of 2012 by core PPI indices for intermediate goods and raw materials.

If such a trend in prices were to be confirmed in the months ahead, inflation would turn from not being a constraint for accommodative monetary policy to a reason for monetary policy to be accommodative.

BY Alexandra ESTIOT
Last Week In The US: Worrying Trend In Prices
 

Related Articles

Michael Ashton
Watch Out For Rise In Money Velocity By Michael Ashton - Jun 29, 2022

As M2 money growth soared throughout the COVID and post-COVID period of direct stimulus check-writing funded by massive quantitative easing (QE), monetarism novices thought that...

Last Week In The US: Worrying Trend In Prices

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email