📖 Your Q2 Earnings Guide: Discover the Stocks ProPicks AI Highlights to Jump Post-EarningsRead more

Gold Stocks: The Sell Signals Are Clear As Day

Published 06/08/2022, 01:47 AM

The technical part of today’s analysis is going to be relatively short, as the PMs declined yesterday, and what I wrote in yesterday’s extensive Gold & Silver Trading Alert simply remains up-to-date.

Immediately after junior miners soared on Thursday, I wrote the following:

The GDXJ moved sharply higher after the session started, and at the moment of writing these words, it moved to the upper border of the previous, early-May price gap. Please note that it was my original target for the previous long positions, and it was just reached.

It doesn’t change the outlook here. When we took profits from the long positions and re-entered short ones, I wrote that we were doing so, not because it was clear that the top was in, but because the risk to reward ratio changed dramatically. And that was indeed the case. The fact that juniors rallied today doesn’t change it. In my view, it was a good decision to switch the positions then based on the data that we had at that time.

Anyway, the medium-term trend remains down, and it seems that we’ll see another – very powerful – downswing shortly.

We didn’t have to wait long for the market to agree with me. Let’s see what happened.

GDXJ - 240-Min Chart

The VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSE:GDXJ) moved slightly above the lower and upper borders of the price gap and above the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement level.

Then, we saw an invalidation of all the above-mentioned breakouts. Invalidations of breakouts are immediate sell signals, so the implications are, of course, bearish.

It’s even clearer on the 1-hour candlestick chart.

GDXJ - 60-Min Chart

The above chart allows us to see that, in addition to the above, the GDXJ first broke below its rising red support line, and then it verified this breakdown—twice. The first verification was an immediate one at the end of May, and we just saw the second one a few days ago.

Its close back below the lower border of the price gap confirms the bearish nature of the recent patterns.

Even though the price is slightly higher than it was at the end of May, based on what happened (the failed breakouts), the short-term outlook is even more bearish now than it was back then.

I’ve written this many times in the previous weeks, but it won’t hurt to clarify it once again. In my opinion (just an opinion, of course, I can’t guarantee any kind of performance), this is an epic shorting opportunity that will seem obvious to everyone several months from now.

There are myriads of signs, but let’s state the obvious: gold was unable to rally despite the—literally—war in Europe. If that isn’t a screaming sell indication for the precious metals market, I don’t know what is. Still, at this time, very few people realize this. You do, though :)

Having said that, let’s take a look at the markets from a more fundamental angle.

Stuck In Quicksand

With anxious bulls unable to muster long-lasting rallies, the harsh realities of unanchored inflation and a hawkish Fed have kept sentiment in check. Moreover, with the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield recapturing 3% on June 6, the bond market isn’t helping the situation.

U.S. 10-Year Treasury Yield Rates

Source: Investing.com

Likewise, with Fed officials warning of further interest rate hikes in the coming months, the economic strain should weigh heavily on the S&P 500 and the PMs.

For example, Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester said on June 3:

“It’s too soon to say that that’s going to change our outlook or my outlook on policy. The No. 1 problem in the economy remains very, very high inflation, well above acceptable levels, and that’s got to be our focus going forward (…).

“I think the Fed has shown that we’re in the process of recalibrating our policy to get inflation back down to our 2% goal. That’s the job before us.”

As a result, while 50 basis point rate increases in June and July are likely done deals, Mester expects the hiking spree to continue in September.

CNBC Release

Source: CNBC

In addition, Fed Vice Chair Lael Brainard mirrored that sentiment on June. 2. Speaking with CNBC, she said:

“We’re certainly going to do what is necessary to bring inflation back down. That’s our No. 1 challenge right now. We are starting from a position of strength. The economy has a lot of momentum.”

Therefore, as long as inflation remains uplifted, the Fed has no cause for pause:

CNBC Release

Source: CNBC

Furthermore, I’ve warned on numerous occasions that the Bank of Canada (BoC) is the hawkish canary in the coal mine. In a nutshell: due to the geographical proximity and the fact that 75% or more of Canadian exports are sent to the U.S., the two regions often have similar economic and monetary policy outcomes.

Moreover, with the BoC hiking interest rates by another 50 basis points on June 1, the feedback loop should continue.

For example, BoC Deputy Governor Paul Beaudry said on June 2 that the central bank may need to raise its overnight lending rate above 3% to curb inflation.

“Price pressures are broadening and inflation is much higher than we expected and likely to go higher still before easing.

“This raises the likelihood that we may need to raise the policy rate to the top end or above the neutral range to bring demand and supply into balance and keep inflation expectations well anchored.”

As a result, investors are unprepared for the policy measures needed to calm unanchored inflation.

The Globe and Mail Release

Source: The Globe and Mail

Also noteworthy, Beaudry added:

“The longer inflation remains well above our target, the more likely it is to feed into inflation expectations, and the greater the risk that inflation becomes self-fulfilling. History shows that once high inflation is entrenched, bringing it back down without severely hampering the economy is hard. Preventing high inflation from becoming entrenched is much more desirable than trying to quash it once it has.”

For context, I’ve long warned that ignoring inflation would have dire long-term consequences for the U.S. economy and any region. Therefore, while the consensus wants central banks to turn dovish, Beaudry realizes that doing so is worse than pushing interest rates “above the neutral range.” I wrote on May 25:

We’ve officially entered the monetary version of The Boy Who Cried Wolf. With Fed officials running to the rescue each time the financial markets show signs of stress, investors are programmed to ignore their hawkish threats. However, while these post-GFC pivots occurred with inflation perched near 2%, investors are so steadfast in their belief that they ignore the climactic consequences of unanchored inflation.

In a nutshell: consumers will eventually run out of money; and if the Fed lets inflation rage, a re-enactment of the 1970s is the worst-possible long-term outcome for Americans. Again, while the post-GFC crowd doesn’t care or doesn’t know history, unanchored inflation in the 1970s/1980s pushed the U.S. into recession four times over ~12 years (the vertical gray bars below). As a result, be careful what you wish for.

CPI For All Urban Consumers

Thus, the Fed finds itself in a catch-22. Curbing inflation should lead to a recession, as nearly all bouts of unanchored inflation have ended in an economic downturn over the last ~70 years. Likewise, waiting for inflation to subside on its own would result in even more suffering.

To explain, I noted above that unanchored inflation in the 1970s/1980s pushed the U.S. into recession four times over ~12 years. As such, that’s roughly one recession every three years. Conversely, stable inflation often coincides with a recession roughly every eight to 10 years.

Moreover, the chart below highlights how all of the post-1970/1980 recessions coincided with rising inflation (except for COVID-19). Thus, with the current inflation rate much higher than any of those periods and more similar to the 1970/1980s, the Fed and the BoC should know that the smaller and less frequent recessions below are preferable to the larger and more frequent recessions above.

As a result, the post-GFC crowd suffers from recency bias and fails to understand these economic challenges.

CPI For All Urban Consumers

To that point, I’ve been bullish on the U.S. economy for some time, and the region remains in a relatively healthy position, all things considered. However, I noted on May 5 that the present situation holds no bearing on the future and that the recession roadmap is always drawn from economic optimism. I wrote:

It’s important to distinguish between where we are now and where we are likely headed. Regarding the latter, the “soft landing” crowd will likely be the 2023 version of the “transitory” crowd from 2021/2022. Regarding the former, the U.S. economy remains on solid footing RIGHT NOW. However, the dynamic only adds further fuel to the hawkish fire.

Furthermore, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon summed it up perfectly on June 1. He said:

“Right now, it’s kind of sunny, things are doing fine, everyone thinks the Fed can handle this. [But] that hurricane is right out there, down the road, coming our way (…).

“We’ve never had QT like this, so you’re looking at something you could be writing history books on for 50 years.”

As a result, the CEO of the largest U.S. bank understands the economic damage that higher interest rates produce.

CNBC Release

Source: CNBC

In addition, the “soft landing” crowd doesn’t realize that their bullishness is sealing the Fed’s fate. For example, the S&P 500 has rallied in recent weeks. However, the optimism only exacerbates the central bank’s inflation problem. To explain, I wrote on May 31:

The only bullish outcome is if economically-sensitive commodities collapse on their own. Then, input inflation would subside and eventually cool output inflation, and the Fed could turn dovish.

However, the central bank has been awaiting this outcome for two years. Thus, my comments from Apr. 6 remain critical. If investors continue to bid up stock prices, the follow-through from commodities will only intensify the pricing pressures in the coming months. Therefore, investors are flying blind once again.

To that point, the S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (S&P GSCI) also participated in the recent run-up. For context, the S&P GSCI contains 24 commodities from all sectors: six energy products, five industrial metals, eight agricultural products, three livestock products and two precious metals. However, energy accounts for roughly 54% of the index’s movement.

Moreover, with the index gunning for its 2022 Russia-Ukraine war highs, the merry-go-round of input/output inflation is easy to see by those paying attention.

GNX Daily Chart

Finally, the Dallas Fed released its Texas Service Sector Outlook Survey on June 1. The report stated:

“Price pressures remained near record highs in May, while wage growth accelerated slightly. The selling prices index softened one point to 32.6, with 36 percent of respondents noting monthly price increases, while the input prices index was unchanged at 53.5. The wages and benefits index added two points to rise to 35.0, only slightly off a record 37.4 reading in January 2022.”

The bottom line? The bulls are stuck in quicksand, and the more they struggle, the deeper they sink. However, they still don’t realize it. When economic optimism buoys stocks, it supports higher prices for cyclical commodities.

Then, month-over-month (MoM) inflation rises, and the Fed needs to up the hawkish ante. As a result, the gambit should end in a hard landing; it’s simply a matter of when.

In conclusion, the PMs were mixed on June 6, as silver ended the day in the green. However, the medium-term outlook is extremely treacherous, as investors underestimate the ferocity of inflation.

As such, more downside should confront the S&P 500 and the PMs as the Fed’s liquidity drain unfolds.

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.