Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
NEW! Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+ Try 7 Days Free

Does Ethereum Face A PoW Fork Hurdle Before Its Merge?

By The Tokenist (Alo Kingsley )CryptocurrencyAug 10, 2022 06:57AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/does-ethereum-face-a-pow-fork-hurdle-before-its-merge-200628319
Does Ethereum Face A PoW Fork Hurdle Before Its Merge?
By The Tokenist (Alo Kingsley )   |  Aug 10, 2022 06:57AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
BTC/USD
+3.48%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
ETH/USD
+2.62%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
USDC/USD
-0.01%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

With a hard fork of the Ethereum network being touted after its upcoming merge, several companies have offered support for the PoS layer.

The upcoming merge of the Ethereum network, which will see it transition into a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, continues to divide opinions. With the merge scheduled for the second half of September, experts fear a civil war on the network will ensue if all goes to plan.

Consequently, the divide has led to several prominent companies pitching their tents with the PoS network. Also, other companies have come out to support the hard fork proof-of-work (PoW) network, which experts believe would likely happen after the merge. Meanwhile, the hype over the upcoming event has seen it outperform Bitcoin as Ethereum’s open interests surged to $7 billion as investors bet on the merge.

USDC, Chainlink Backs PoS Ethereum

Circle and Chainlink, two prominent companies within the digital asset ecosystem, have aligned themselves with the decision of the Ethereum Foundation and its community. In an official statement, the chainlink protocol revealed it would continue to run its services on the Ethereum network post-merge. Accordingly, forked versions of the Ethereum blockchain, including PoW forks, will no longer be supported by the Chainlink protocol post-Merge.

Similarly, Circle, the company which issues the USDC stablecoin, has thrown its weight behind the upcoming merge. The company stated it was excited about the future scaling opportunities it would provide and its reduced energy consumption profile. Consequently, it intended to fully and solely support the Ethereum PoS chain after the merge. The statement read:

“As Ethereum approaches “The Merge” event, we are excited about the future scaling opportunities it unlocks as well as the reduced energy consumption profile of the network. USDC is the largest dollar-backed stablecoin issued on Ethereum, and, as the issuer of USDC, Circle intends to fully and solely support the Ethereum proof of stake (PoS) chain post-merge.”

The actions of these companies seem to echo the sentiment of Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, who downplayed the impact of a hard fork. Speaking at the developer event ETH Seoul last weekend, he said he did not expect Ethereum to be significantly harmed by another fork.

Furthermore, Buterin remarked that supporters of the PoW consensus mechanism had migrated to Ethereum classic when it launched in 2016. He said this is because they knew that the Ethereum blockchain would eventually shift to a PoS while the Ethereum classic would not. Despite his bullish stance, advocates of a hard fork have continued to grow.

Miners, Sun Support PoW Ethereum

The upcoming Ethereum merge has seen significant opposition from several industry participants and heavyweight. Many believe that the PoS Ethereum would make the network less secure and vulnerable to breaches. Meanwhile, it would also replace miners with validators, potentially signaling an end to income earned by miners.

Consequently, prominent Chinese miner Chandler Guo has led agitations for the creation of a PoW hard fork if the merge occurs. He believes this will enable Ethereum miners to continue earning income without being left stranded with potentially useless specialized hardware.

Several exchanges, including Bitmex, Poloniex, and Okx, have all come out to offer support for the PoW Ethereum hard fork. Bitmex announced it would launch a Tether-margined ETHPoW futures contract on August 9, giving its customers exposure to ETHPOW with up to 2x leverage. Poloniex, backed by Justin Sun, said they would support and list all potential hard fork tokens.

Furthermore, Sun, the founder of the Tron Network, has come out in favor of a potential fork. He promised support for developing the existing Ethereum network following the merge. He made this pledge in response to Poloniex’s tweet regarding their support for hard fork tokens.

Tweet
Tweet

As it is, the possibility of a hard fork remains high, with the proposal for it seeing significant backing already. However, the existence of the Ethereum classic offers a potentially suitable option for miners to migrate to. Meanwhile, USDC and Chainlink supporting the PoS merge also throw another spanner in the works for the Ethereum PoW agitators. With a month still to go before the merge, interested parties would need to keep their fingers crossed regarding all possible outcomes.

Does Ethereum Face A PoW Fork Hurdle Before Its Merge?
 

Related Articles

Deron Wagner
Don’t Miss The Bitcoin Rally By Deron Wagner - Oct 04, 2022 2

After months of range-bound trading, Bitcoin is now setting up for a huge breakout above key resistance. Here’s how to profit from this hot crypto swing trade setup...

Tim Knight
Between A Rock And Hard Placeum By Tim Knight - Oct 04, 2022

It may sound hard to believe, but it’s up to Ethereum at this point. That is to say, the “animal spirits” are beholden to resistance (the line at $1408) and support (beneath it, as...

Does Ethereum Face A PoW Fork Hurdle Before Its Merge?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email